Talk: Sonic Wiki Zone/Archive 2

5 Months?!?!?!

Why has it been 5 months since the last edit?!?!?! HyperSonicBoom 22:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I think Sonic fans don't know about this wiki. Do you know how we could find some more people to edit here? Are you a member of any sonic forums where you could ask your friends to join in? Angela ^talk 01:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Just a quick tip: A search for "sonic wiki" on google in apr 2008 yields "Sonic News Network - 15:02

We now have a sister wiki, the Mobius Encyclopaedia!" -- not very informative :) also placing a link in "external links" in key wikipedia articles might help. -- 87.194.117.25 23:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to try to make this wiki better, wish me luck! Sacre Fi 23:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Good luck! :) Angela ^talk 03:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Let me help! I love Sonic 1 and 2! I have some music and have a lot of information. I first think that we should all use the debug mode cheat to map the levels. We can then get the music and put it here. I think that we CAN make a difference to this wiki! User:Navij11/Signatures 16:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I call all the sonic history pages! i know everything about the older sonics! yay!Template:Signatures/Sir Robin

=D Yay for recruitment! ^{P.S. You don't have a signature template for this wiki yet. ;)} Sacre Fi 01:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

You can just sign with ~~~~ instead. Angela ^talk 17:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

This is way late, but I guess Sacre got me to come from RS Wiki to over here. Template:Signatures/Chiafriend1218:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Admins

Who are the Admins here? Will there be more added later? Also, if you are looking for something to do, look here User:Navij11/Signatures 01:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I think the administrators have abandoned this wiki... someone should try to be one after a certain amount of edits. Sacre Fi 04:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Template Problems

*Sigh* I think something's wrong with what we're doing with new templates... like Template:General CVG character, because they turn out fine on the template page, but when they're put elsewhere everything goes wrong. I don't mean to be a pain, but we need some advice... Sacre Fi 05:37, 28 ggggggggggggggggggwith my character template! If there was a temlpate making guide, it would help a whole lot! Template:Signatures/Navij11 19:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Anyone know what's up with the References template? Just look at FFF's beloved E-123 (or the newly-ref'd Pir'Oth Ix); the references are numbered fine within the article, but it's all 1's when you actually get to the bottom. Wassup wid dat? (Molten Scandium 23:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC))

Note to Staff

We have voted on an admin on the admin page. Please check it! Thanks! Also, can anybody explain the above? Template:Signatures/Navij11 22:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I've made 2 new admins. User:Splarka is a good person to ask about the template problems. Angela ^talk 12:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Im going to make this page look like Sonic Channel, but english

Sonic Channel may rule, but this wiki rules!

SNN, Some user threatened me with vandalism

SNN, block this user for threatening me with vandalism, i have been finding sources.

Big Website

This wiki is getting popular and bigger.

Please hurry up with the edits. ITs been 15 years and the articles are quite young.

Comments

I just want to remind everyone to please sign your comments by typing four tildes ("~~~~") at the end of your posts. Thanks. FerralMoonrender 00:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey hurry up and edit things faster you guys. We also needed a Featured article or something on the Main page.(Assaulthead 08:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC))

Yeah, on the bottom, I put a link to the featured article voting. I think that we actually need featured articles, now the people are making their own articles. Template:Signatures/Navij11 21:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Main Page design

Hullo! I'm Kirkburn, a Wikia Gaming Helper, and I have a suggestion to make regarding the Main Page. You may be interested in stealing some code from the Wikia Starter wiki which is the current new wiki base design. It makes content a bit easier to add and is easily expanded. Keep up the great work! Kirkburn (talk) 18:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

That sounds like a decent idea! I'll see what we can do about it! Thanks for the heads up! - Template:Signatures/Navij11 05:23, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

How's it look? FerralMoonrender 03:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Looks great! Kirkburn (talk) 18:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Images and Info Suggestions

Enzeru 18:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC) (teamARTAIL, Sonic Style, Sonic Art Archive, Sonic Cult, The Sonic Stadium)

Sonic Criticism

I, Enzeru 16:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC) , think we should add a page on Sonic Criticism (don't have time). Includes Canonicity (Sally, Mario, Shuffle, G-Mel, Nazo, X, Elise, other side characters), Relationships (Sally, Blaze, Chris, Elise, Amy), Worlds (where/when Blaze comes from, Earth/Mobius), 4Kids, and Past/Present.

Why Sonic Voices From 4Kids Suck

The reason why Mike Pollock does well as Eggman is because he had clips from Deem Bristow and utilized them. The same goes for Emi Motoi as Amy in Sonic Shuffle, Ryan Drummond as Knuckles in Sonic Shuffle, and so on. Maybe we should just ask Jason Griffith to use Ryan's Sonic clips for reference instead of asking for Drummond back (not that he has a chance of coming back, sadly) or flaming Griffith.

Tiara B.

I've been writing an article about the character Tiara Boobowski from the canceled game, Sonic X-treme. I'm new here, so I'm not familiar with the templates, categories, etc. Can someone let me know which templates and categories I should add at the bottom of her page? ...and furthermore, which ones I should add her to? Stumpers 18:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Great job! Enzeru 18:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! Stumpers 00:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Sonic Unleashed

I'm assuming everyone knows of it, right? Enzeru 18:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I definately know,I have it on PS2.?TDK TDKiller

Wikia Gaming IRC channel

Hullo! I am Kirkburn, your friendly local Wikia Gaming Helper!

You may be interested to know there is a Wikia gaming IRC channel, #wikia-gaming on chat.freenode.net, where you can hop on, ask for help from users of other gaming wikis, or offer your own experiences. If you are not familiar with IRC clients, you can access it from http://irc.wikia.com/gaming.

Different people may be on sporadically, but we organize weekly chats at a fixed time so we can get the most number of people online at the same time to ask and answer questions, or just to hang out. The admins of some of Wikia's biggest gaming wikis (e.g. WoW, Halo) often attend them. You can find the time for the next chat by following this link.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me! Kirkburn (talk) 11:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Metal Shadic

MetalShadic

Dunno where best to present such topics nor if it's in my power to do something about it as a Member. Sorry.

Does it counts as Vandalism and should be noticed?

--Mystic Monkey 23:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Fanon characters are moved to a user's userspace, but in this case it's just an IP account... what to do... Stumpers 00:43, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, is it allowed for people to leave User links to there fan characters on the appropriate page? Like on my page, it would help with the explanation of the page.

Mystic Monkey 14:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

PS. Who should I discuss if I see any problems or should I just report the page through the tab?

One of the admins, FerralMoonrender, is always quick in this sort of thing. He's usually on at least once a week and took care of a similar problem about two weeks ago. There are other people you can ask, too, of course, but FM has been who I run to with spam/vandalism/etc. Stumpers 00:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

---Featured article we should lower the time limit an article is featured, this one has been featured for about 5 or so months.

Im in Sonic Rush 3?

I sent a report on this topic But just to know, no, Mystic Monkey is not appearing in any Sonic games.

However I got a message from the original person who started the topic and edited my profile abit, He thought my userpage was an article.

Besides Sonic Rush 3, how come unregesterd guests get to edit users accounts? Mystic Monkey 11:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

They're not supposed to, but there is technically nothing stopping them, you just have to revert any changes they make, and, if it becomes a real problem, leave a message on their talk page and warn an admin (such as myself), who can protect pages from editing by unregistered users. ~ FerralMoonrender 10:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Main page layout and monaco skin

Hi all, your friendly local Wikia Gaming helper here!

I've been working on a new main page layout. Hopefully you have read about the skin and ad changes at Wikia's New Style on Central Wikia. If not, I hope you'll have a look.

One of the changes is a block of two ads on each main page. It's possible that they won't always show up, but to ensure your main page continues to work properly when they do, you need to update your main page column formatting code with new column tags.

I have drafted a main page using the new tags on User:Kirkburn/Dev which I hope you can take a look at - feel free to edit it of course. The main change to the layout is the fixed width of the right column. This still allows a lot of customisation - for example see these main pages - w:c:muppet, w:c:wowwiki, w:c:ffxi. If you encounter any problems with the new tags, please let me know. The new design also has a section for contents links - this should really be filled out to give visitors a sense of what you cover and quick links to the important stuff. I will look at filling in a few.

You also need to consider the move to Monaco skin, and whether you want to customise the skin for this wiki. For examples of customisation, see Memory Alpha, Millitary Wikia, Rappelz or even (if you really want to see what can be done) UK Transport Wikia.

Or, you can choose one of the defaults. Please let me know what you prefer!

Thanks, Kirkburn (talk) 12:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I've updated the draft with links to some of the main articles - it could probably be expanded/improved with someone with better knowledge of what's popular and useful. Regarding the poll, I realise that goes off the screen - there's a fairly easy tweak to the CSS that will fix it for live. I'd love to get the new layout in before next week - any feedback for it? Kirkburn (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Can the header ("Welcome to the Sonic News Network", etc.) go all the way across the top? I think that would make it look a lot better. If you want my honest opinion, (and please don't take this personally,) i think it looks awful compared to our current main page (and our current main page took me quite a while to design, too!) I'm annoyed about being forced to switch to Monaco in general, (I've always hated the Monaco skin,) but if we have to switch, I guess we have to. I'll work on it over the weekend, and I do appreciate and thank you for your help. ~ FerralMoonrender 08:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I see now that it can't, because that would interfere with the ads (which look atrocious, by the way.) Oh well, at least the ads will fill the awkward whitespace. ~ FerralMoonrender 08:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

The reason for that is that ad buyers like to have joined-up ads, and it also means the ads aren't "within" the content as much. I do understand the frustration, but there's still a lot you can do with it. Regarding the skin, it mainly affects anon visitors - you can still choose to browse on monobook if you wish :) Kirkburn (talk) 12:25, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Any news, or particular way the design could be improved? I want to make the transition as smooth as possible. (I made the old gamingstarter and current starter layouts - so it's not as if I'm not familiar with the design :P )

I should also mention, for logged-in users, the only ads you will see are on the main page. The reason we double-up on ads there is because ad buyers really like that spot, and pay better for it - by having more there, it means we can have less elsewhere. Kirkburn (talk) 12:44, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

I have made a few more tweaks, fixed the poll, and put it live. Please feel free to tweak it. As for the skin, Monaco Sapphire seems to fit well with the site. Is it okay as-is, or would you like any customizations? Kirkburn (talk) 18:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

As there have been no objections, I have switched the skin. Kirkburn (talk) 23:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Can't edit main page, and someone make this correction?

I noticed the main page, has been protected, which is fine and dandy. I was just wondering if someone could correct the information about Mobius Encyclopaedia where it says it currently has "145 articles" and correct it to be "400 articles". Thanks for your time. - Dimitri the Echidna 22:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Update, Mobius Encyclopaedia is up to 500 articles. If someone could update that for me, it'd be awesome. - Dimitri the Echidna 20:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

R.E The Wikia gaming section at the bottom of the main page

can an admin edit it, so it includes, Sega and Smashwiki and any other related Wikia wiki's

--{{SUBST:User:Semajdraehs/sig}} 22:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

New here

Hi, I'm new here. I'm from The Super Mario Wiki. Anyways, If you guys want some inside info, ask Chaosninji, he's Pete Capella's cousin. Now, if you excuse me, I'm checking out the Chatroom.-KP Blue 18:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

New Character Template Idea

Hey all, I just wanted to throw a new idea out there for templates containing character lists. The main one is getting very overwhelming with the vast amount of characters, and is growing with every day. So, my plan is to change it Template:Recurring Game Characters, while characters who were in one game only (Excluding cameos), will be placed in a template for characters from that specific game, much like how I did here. Games with sequels would share the same template. For example: Template:Sonic Riders Characters. I also propose something similar for the comics, and shows, but, going by arc, instead of game. What's everyone's opinions on my proposal? _Skeletal SLJCOAAATR ^Soul 22:16, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I think it's a good idea. The old one is getting too big and crowed. Unknown the Hedgehog 22:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

...Anyone else...? _Skeletal SLJCOAAATR ^Soul 19:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

SLJ's Goals

• Merge game plot info from character articles, to game articles. (Example: E-123 Omega)
• Remove excess/un-needed images from articles.
• Shorten reationship sections in character articles. One-time relations/ver minor relations need to be cut down very much, and have only the vital parts remain, or be completely removed. (Example: Amy Rose)
• (See above

I hope you all see eye to eye with me, and agreewith my ideas to improve/neaten up a bit more. I wanted to place this here before I changed anything,so that you could all place your ideas/opinions. Thank you. _Skeletal SLJCOAAATR ^Soul 19:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your wanting to remove info from the 'Relationships' sections, I can understand the arguments for conciseness, and that this is not meant to be a collection of every scrap of info about the kitchen sink, but if we can have more specific info, I don't see any reason not to do so. What would you think of having separate pages, or better yet, subpages, for more specific info (ex. Amy Rose/Relationships) or do you have a different idea? ~ FerralMoonrender 23:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

How about a page for relationships in general?E123Brawler 01:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I think that would just be worse. A subpage for relationships is just moving the mess from one place to another. All we need to do is trim it down a bit.

Why do we need to merge the plot content? It's already in the articles. And readers should be able to know the character's role in a certain game without having to go back and forth between articles.Fairfieldfencer FFF 09:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

I think we should keep them all in the characters articles, just, trim it down to just the vital stuff.

As for the game roles, that's part of the reason the Wiki articles were merged. We just don't need that. A quick summerization of their roles in each continuity, but, don't go too much in-depth. Save that for each specific games article. _Skeletal SLJCOAAATR ^Soul 23:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Scourge The Hedgehog

The Main page is missing Scourge The Hedgehog in the Villians Section.

It's just for the major game characters. Scourge isn't even that important. _Skeletal SLJCOAAATR ^Soul

There's more useless villains there too.Metal Knuckles isn't important.He's only in 1 game,right,Sonic R?TDK TDKiller

Fanart

I my opinion, fanart images here, on SNN aren't serving any relevance, and should be deleted. What do you, the Sonic News Network community, think about the matter? LORD SLJCOAAATR ^Admin 21:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I think fan-art should only be for people's user look-up. Fan art wouldn't be informative for most, being as anyone can add stuff like different colors and anything else that would cause many rumors, like "OMG! Sonic is really fat!" or "HEY! Shadow's stripes are really blue!" or any other nonsense. Sonic Fan Fiction is also pointless on a Sonic Wiki, due to the fact that some Sonic Fan stuff may serve no relation to Sonic at all. --Nickno 22:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Nick, by user look-up, I assume you mean userspace? As I'm fine with that. It's just, I don't have the time to go through EVERY bit of fanart, and check to see if it's even being used at all... LORD SLJCOAAATR ^Admin 22:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I agree with SLJ in theory, but might widespread deletion of fanon creations alienate some editors who contribute useful articles as well? Wouldn't the wiki be better served by someone making one canon article and one fanon article than it would by someone who makes no articles at all? (Molten Scandium 22:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC))

That's fine, and dandy, Molten. If you see a 'fanon' article, look at the page's 'History'. If there's pretty much been one solid editor for it, select 'Move'. Type in User:(Insert users name here, not this)/(Name of article, not this.)

Make sure you don't forget the '/'! LORD SLJCOAAATR ^Admin 22:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Oops. Yeah, I meant userspace. Anyways, I really think fan art shouldn't be on this wiki at all. I was thinking at another one's point of view. I mean really, The SONIC Wiki should be about, umm, oh yeah, SONIC! But, I guess there will always BE Sonic Fan stuff on here. Also, I think SLJ's theory of moving fan pages by one person is good. If someone makes their own Sonic character, then they should have it on their userspace. It makes perfect sense. --Nickno 22:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

←SLJ, people have been putting fanart on here for a while. Let's just leave it. If it isn't broken, don't fix it. Y'know? Having a conversation between a small group of editors and then deleting all these images without telling anybody about it, is exactly the same injustice we had on Wikipedia with that huge merge.Fairfieldfencer FFF 23:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, this came at an opportune time. With reference to what I've just done with Scrap Brain Zone. While I was rewriting and re=formatting that article I was actually thinking a nice piece of fanart wouldn't go amiss. And I think it looks better the way it is than if you take it out. 'Cos you see, it is relevant where I've stuck it.

(Molten Scandium 01:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC))

Fanart can't be used in articles because it doesn't depict the article's subject properly. You're treating this like I was with information I saw as relevant on Wikipedia. But there's just one tiny flaw in that argument. All the information I wanted to keep was official, while the fanart you want to put in articles is not.Fairfieldfencer FFF 10:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

I think the main priority with fanart is simply leave it were it is and remove any that makes its way into article-space. That way, everyone wins.Fairfieldfencer FFF 10:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Fanart can't be used in articles because it doesn't depict the article's subject properly. - Good point, well made. In which case I concur. (Molten Scandium 11:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC))

T'whatever suits yo boat, Triple. Looks like we'll just keep it out of mainspace. Any other opinions? LORD SLJCOAAATR ^Admin 20:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, in my honest opinion, 99% of fanrt is crap, both in appearance and in design. This is a wiki, with no need for fancruft. And even if fanart is limited, as it has been as of late, people will still post it. It's better just to ban it altogether, but even then, it likely won't solve anything.E123Brawler Ω 01:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, because it'll still get uploaded. Users on this wiki have every right to put whatever information about themselves on their userpages. I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed to put fanart there as well.Fairfieldfencer FFF 11:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Fanart should be restricted to userpages and connected pages (IE. userpage/something), outside the main space. In some cases though, where it's impossible for an original image and a fan made image is as close as possible to the needed image, then that should be passable. Flashfire212 09:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

No it shouldn't. This website deals with official information. The images in the articles should be official too.Fairfieldfencer FFF 11:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Exactly. Real image, or no image at all. LORD SLJCOAAATR ^Admin 20:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

I mean that fanart can be useful. They use Fanart on the Final Fantasy wiki to great effect. Why can't they use it here for improved images of badniks if the image just plain sucks? Flashfire212 00:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

You have a very good point there, Flashfire212.-It's-a me, KP Blue!! Wish me luck in the final WST

Thank you! Flashfire212 00:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Like I've alreadt stated, we deal with official info in articles so we should deal with official images as well. Those guys at the Final Fantasy wiki think it's a good idea, but I say different for numerous reasons. One of those reasons is fanart can never be trusted to be 100% accurate which is what we want our articles to be. Take fanart of E-123 Omega for example. Every piece of artwork of him I've seen has not been completely accurate. Most of the time they give him two Omega symbols when he usually has one. The few artists that actually manage to avoid that mistake usually make others. Like the images quality isn't good enough. Like the artist sowia. He's always avoided that mistake but he always draws things in pencil so the quality isn't good enough. And he's drawn pictures of Team Dark at Christmas or on holiday at the seaside. If somebody comes across this image after seeing that sowia drew an image of Omega and it's on his article, the user might think "Am I supposed to think because those pieces of fanart with Team Dark at the seaside are official because they used sowia's other fanart on a wiki? Maybe." When the answer is actually no.Fairfieldfencer FFF 10:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I support fan art. I Believe that Fan art for mainspace articles should only be aprooved by admins and higher mods, but still be allowed to be uploaded for Userpage uses like my pictures on my userpages. You won't find them anywhere else. Still if uploading fan art on SNN is a problem to the server or however it works then why not a seperate method of uploading that works? Eitherway it falls in my support for (admin aprooved) fan articles can be allowed on SNN. Incidentally fan art can also be used for mainspace articles if the picture is accurate. for example in the Mighty the Armadillo article we had a picture from Chris Supernerd until replaced by a picture from Archie. Point is at least some fan art should be allowed in Mainspace while OK for Userpages unless it is causing a technical problem with the server that holds SNN images. Also take into notice that SNN if a fan project itself and not made by Sega or Sonic Team--Mystic Monkey 22:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Ah. I remember Chris' 3D Mighty. But, as FFF has stated, there's some sort of mistake, and could easily fool fans. Back when Mighty had on article on Wikipedia, and that image was used, I thought that it meant Mighty was in a 3D game, and went crazy trying to find him. Then I realised it was photoshopped off Sonic's Shadow art. Same for Tikal's nex-gen art, but, with Amy. Point is, fanart is completely irrelevant. LORD SLJCOAAATR ^Admin 22:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, if irrelevent on Mainspace then so be it, perhaps selected fan artist SNN trust to provide pictures for certain articles but if in general fanart is not allowed on Mainspace then I atleast hope it be OK for userpages. I know I said I support aprooved fan articles but lets talk about 'now' than future matters. I have fan art on my userpage thats to show who my fan char is, be problem if by no fan art, it includes Userpage pictures.--Mystic Monkey 23:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

I think that Fan art should only be used for characters for which there are limited images of, such as Mephiles or Chip who only appear once and don't even have Sonic Channel bios.

No. The fanart should stick to userpages and nothing more. There are loads of reasons why. Show me any simple fanart image and I'll put up a good case why it shouldn't be in an article.Fairfieldfencer FFF 20:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Not minding whether Mainspce or not, What if it's volunteered and SNN approved fan art as long as it's all accurate? Though Id be satisfied if fanart be allowed on Userpages.--Mystic Monkey 03:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

No. I doubt it would be 100% accurate. And besides, the articles deal with official info, the images should be official too.Fairfieldfencer FFF 08:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

True, agree with you there. Problem is getting the official images even if the articles about a rare character. Closest I believe for Mighty would be from Knuckles' Chaotix... I think, I don't own the original copy with manual.--Mystic Monkey 13:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

You mean like this? [1]Fairfieldfencer FFF 13:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Yah thats the one. *Checks the Mighty link again* Well was sure it wasn't there last time I checked. Point is that though we have pictures of Archie sonic characters, it's best to provide them with pictures from alternate selves like games etc.--Mystic Monkey 14:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

For that we need pictures from the games and not fanart. just wanted to get that straight.Fairfieldfencer FFF 14:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Enzeru 17:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC) I say fanart is acceptible on actual pages ONLY if the character has no drawn art we can use on the page and is Sonic Adventure/Sonic Channel styled (ex. Photoshop art of Chip using SA2B style.

Can you guarantee it would be 100% accurate? I once saw a recolor of Shadow's Channel art to make it look like Mephiles and I could see things wrong with it. And they're basically the same.Fairfieldfencer FFF 18:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I think fanart is ok, it should only be used on user namespace, though.--Digisapien 23:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

THIS IS TOTALLY STUPID!!!!!!!!!! Fanart is like any other pic!!!! THAT IS BULLCRAP!!!!!! D:<

In-Universe / Out-Universe writing style

As my beady eye catches the glorious updated front page and ol' Meatbag-hating Omega, I also notice the starting phraseology: "E-123 Omega is a fictional robot robot from the Sonic the Hedgehog video game universe..."'

I.e. not written in an in-universe style (circa my recent Solaris Project page). I'm wondering, before I go on writing more articles, if this is accepted best practice? I don't particularly WANT to have to qualify all my articles with "This is a fictional zone / robot / character" at the start, and I don't think articles on the Sonic wiki require this kind of qualification, given that it's... well, it's not Wikipedia. It isn't supposed to contain a wealth of information on IRL things, so no-one who's going to be reading it is going require the opening "This is fictional" discalimer tag.

Molten Scandium 17:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

This is 100% optional, my friend.Fairfieldfencer FFF 17:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Okays! ^_^ (Molten Scandium 18:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC))

Yeup, you're safe. LORD SLJCOAAATR ^Admin 22:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Templaaaaaaaaaates vs. canon

Fellow editors;

While clicking happily on the "Random page" button in an effort to increase my general understanding of those canons what I ain't not seen none of, a theme emerges.

And that theme's name is "Articles with no attribution as to what continuity they belong in".

This is perhaps something of a problem, if we want this wiki to become the central repository of information from... well, all canons. It's important to be able to distinguish between them; especially if you're a fascist like me who eschews all mention of anything but game canon from his own fanfic-y works.

Accordingly:

This article deals exclusively with a feature of the Sonic X universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

This article deals exclusively with a feature of the Sonic Underground universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

Might I propose that new templates of the above nature be implemented, with a view as to more clearly specifying the continuity of articles dealing with characters / events / locations which appear only in a single sphere of the grand Sonic metaverse?

Molten Scandium 23:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Excellent idea. Make the templates at once but replace the images of characters with the logo of the individual canon.Fairfieldfencer FFF 08:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Personally, I would say to also make ones for Sonic The Comic and Archie's Sonic the Hedgehog. Games arn't really needed. Also, for note of all things fanon, we should have a fanon catagory for userpage connected/forum connected fanfics and the like. Flashfire212 09:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Agreed on both accounts. Comics should have their own template. The logo should be easy to get. The categories for fan pages I at first thought unnecessary, but it would help clear things up for the confused reader.Fairfieldfencer FFF 09:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

I fully intended to craft templates for the comics as well; the two you see above were simply the 'samplers' from what will become a complete set. As for replacing the character pictures with the the appropriate series logos...

This article deals exclusively with a feature of the Sonic Underground universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

THAT was my alternative output for the Sonic Underground one, but I didn't think it looked as good as the Sonia / Manic version. Molten Scandium 11:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Also, here's another one for ya:

This article deals exclusively with a feature of the Sonic OAV Movie universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

Molten Scandium 11:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Just replace the images with the logos, (you can probably find them on Wikipedia), and then send 'em out throughout the wiki. I must say, Molten, keep it up and admin status is most definitely yours.Fairfieldfencer FFF 11:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Tails' face I think captures what runs through all our heads when we see some of the fanon insanity people come out with:

THIS ARTICLE IS MARKED FOR SPEEDY DELETION It discusses completly unsanctioned fan work and has at best only a tenuous relationship with any official Sonic media You should move the article to Userspace ASAP, or you may soon find it deleted by an admin

Poor, poor Tails. Molten Scandium 23:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

LOL. But, Scandium, templates are supposed to go right at the top of articles. I just wanted to clear that out.Fairfieldfencer FFF 10:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

The one on the movie page was nearly at the top. I only shifted it down a tad so you didn't have the MASSIVE GAPING WHITE SPACES on either side.

But I take it from this you'd prefer a wide, banner-like template rather than the squashed one I have now, such that the template can be placed at the very top but the aforementioned white spaces aren't there? Molten Scandium 12:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes. I'd prefer for the articles to look nice and neat. I'm a bit of a perfectionist.Fairfieldfencer FFF 13:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

This article deals exclusively with a feature of the Sonic OVA Movie universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

File:Schweetness.JPG

Better?

I'll go update the template now, then. ^^ Molten Scandium 13:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Finished Templates

Volia:

This article's subject lies mainly within the AoStH cartoon universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

The above is implemented with {{AoStH}}.

This article's subject lies mainly within the SatAM cartoon universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

The above is implemented with {{SatAM}}.

This article's subject lies mainly within the Sonic OVA Movie universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

File:Schweetness.JPG

The above is implemented with {{Movie}}.

File:SonicXLogoFFE4E1bg.png

This article's subject lies mainly within the Sonic X universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

The above is implemented with {{Sonic X}}.

This article's subject lies mainly within the Fleetway Sonic the Comic universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

The above is implemented with {{STC}}.

File:205481-11074-115325-1-sonic-the--1.jpg

This article's subject lies mainly within the Archie Sonic Comics universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

The above is implemented with {{Archie}}.

This article's subject lies mainly within the Sonic Underground universe. Be aware that the information presented may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

The above is implemented with {{Underground}}.

These are all working and ready to be rolled out. They automaticly add the article to the relevent category, and the template pages themselves include advice on best-use practice and how to resolve possible overlaps. ENJOY!! ^_^

(PS: I did look for the logos, on Wikipedia AND Google, but Underground and Sonic X were the only ones I could find. And I had to edit the Sonic X one in Paint myself to get eh background the right colour, which was a bit of a chore I can tell you.)

Molten Scandium 00:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Molten, these are most impressive and will come in very useful. Thank you for all your hard work and determination. You're going to be one of the key gears in the great machine known as the Sonic News Network.Fairfieldfencer FFF 10:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Aww, I was the one who suggested and wanted to make these ages ago when I started out to help organise between the different canons and even a banner for fancruft.--Mystic Monkey 01:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

So... why didn't you? Molten Scandium 09:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

'cus no admin or mod permited me to make them.--Mystic Monkey 14:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Amazing, Molten! As Triple F has stated, you'll be a key player here. Too bad I can't get time to do any major work... ^.^;

Anyways, I shall start looking for articles to place these in. Think you could make one along the lines of "This is a fanpage, used only for fanon purposes, and has no relation to any canons's." As well as, ones for the Knuckles' comics, Universe, and those old miniseries'? LORD SLJCOAAATR ^Admin 15:31, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Im getting lulz'd at, I just know it, since we usually argue over fancruft eh SLJ? :P. >_< So how do you make these banners anyway?--Mystic Monkey 03:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Monkey: You'll note I made prototypes FIRST and THEN asked for permission to implement them. ;D
If you want to know how to make them: just steal the code from one of mine and play around with it in Sandbox, or something. It's not too hard once you get the hang of it.
If you were wanting to know how to place them: it's just as I laid out above. When you're editing a page, simply type {{AoStH}} at the top and the AoStH banner will turn up when you view it normally. Molten Scandium 22:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

SLJ: Consider it done. For fanon, at least. With regard to the other miniseries: I understand where you're coming from, but there's something of a problem, and it applies to a lesser extent to the SatAM template too. Before I made these templates, FFF told me that the SatAM and Archie continuities, while largely overlapping, were technically distinct and so I'd be best to make a banner for both of them seperately. And I did, as ye can see above. The problem is that I've found a grand total of ONE article that's in SatAM and not Archie (and I'm not even certain about that one, given that I never watched / read either of those series), which has made me question the need for a SatAM template at all. A combined SatAM / Archie one, on the other hand, would sweep the problem away entirely.
Why is this relevant to your request? Well, basicly because I think the problem's only gonna get worse with the Knuckles comics, which are exactly the same continuity as Archie. We'd run the risk of ending up with, liek, multiple banners per page: Archie Continuity' and Knuckles series continuity and SatAM continuity all for the same article, making it both CONFUSING and HORRIBLY UNTIDY.
So my humble proposal is this: Just use the ones we have for now (in fact, maybe roll it back one, 'cos the more I think about it, the more attractive a singular SatAM + Archie banner becomes), and IF AND WHEN the number of articles deaing with Knuckles comics / Universe comics ALONE gets to a high enough level, then roll out specific templates for 'em.
I just think it's a waste of our time (and, most horribly, MY time in making it) collecting templates that only apply to about two articles, y'see. Molten Scandium 22:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

It would be rather untidy with all those templates. God, imagine what Sonic's article would look like.Fairfieldfencer FFF 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm convinced to agre now, Molten. Even putting up good arguments, unlike my puss-bag come backs. This one's got great potential! Now if only my guy would get back with my plans...... LORD SLJCOAAATR ^{Sonic Wikia Admin} 01:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I do talk sense sometimes. :) Also, here's the "Fanon" one. I made it a bit louder than the other templates, as it's... well, it's a warning that it's all lies, isn't it?

File:Shadow the hedgehog by basta6.jpg

THIS PAGE DISCUSSES FANON WORKS It contains information or fan images that are unrelated to any official Sonic continuity.

File:Mephiles by 00Aki.jpg

The above is implemented with {{Fanon}}.

I guess credit should go to Mystic Monkey again, as a peruse of the Forums shows that he thought of this 6 months ago as well, lolz. Molten Scandium 02:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I would of helped and made the banner if I knew how banner making and the permisison system works. ^_^; I was wither gonna have Mystic at first but though Ashura would be more of a neutral choice. But I hope the fan banner will be used well, not just for userpages but permitted fan articles, but that discussion is for here since it's already there. Plus technically the fan information would relate to the continuality, unless it truely has nothing to do with Sonic, lik,e a Mario fna on this Wiki.--Mystic Monkey 13:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Although it's a bit late now, FOR FUTURE REFERENCE I'd advise putting the templates at the bottom of the page rather than the top. Lengthy experimentation has demonstrated that, on aggregate, it looks neater down there. Otherwise you have a big wide banner taking up space (and attention) in the opening screen, which tends to detract from the nice presentation of those better-constructed articles. Molten Scandium 20:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

VERY NICE, Molten!

Actually, they're better off at the top, due to people who don't look at the bottom. Let's say, without the fanon template, someone looks at a fanon article, doesn't see it at top, assumes it's real. LORD SLJCOAAATR ^{Sonic Wikia Admin} 21:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Agree with the Fanon one, if only because that's denoting COMPLETLY non-canonical information and so your attention SHOULD be drawn away from the content of the article itself. But for the official continuity templates, I can't escape a feeling of horrible guilt when I just slap it there at the top of a well-constructed article and ruin the encyclopaedic look. :S

Plus, if you're interested in an article enough to care which continuity it's from, I'd think you'd be interested enough to scroll down to the bottom? Molten Scandium 21:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Breaxorz

True, but, there's nothing wrng with it. I've found myself getting side-tracked to a link to another article before finishing the one I'm reading. So, personally, I say the top is fine. It looks like a good way to start, and prevents cluelesseness. Any other opinions? LORD SLJCOAAATR ^{Sonic Wikia Admin} 21:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

This about top or bottom? Banners go to the top, it's like wiki tradition :D. That and it helps researchers know they found the right articles they are looking for than stating "What is this crap" mid way through the article.--Mystic Monkey 20:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

"I've found myself getting side-tracked to a link to another article before finishing the one I'm reading." - Good point, well made. Top it is! Molten Scandium 20:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Really? It was that easy? :P LORD SLJCOAAATR ^{Sonic Wikia Admin} 23:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Your point made a lot o' sense. Plus, I also have a secret plan to tweak the templates so they don't take up quite so much space and look a bit more encyclopaedic. Stay tuned! ;) Molten Scandium 23:57, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

My secret plan hasn't been working too well..... -_-; LORD SLJCOAAATR ^{Sonic Wikia Admin} 17:09, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

And I finally implement my secret plan. Voila:

This article's subject lies mainly within the Archie Sonic Comics continuity. The information may not be canonical to the storyline of the Sonic games.

Now, I know what you're thinking. "That's much worse! We've got a nice, clear, graphical banner already; why would you go BACKWARDS to something lame like that?". Well; the reason is as I stated above.

SPACE.

As it stands, these banners are big things, and in my wikiskin, at least, they tend to shunt the rest of the age downwards so you can't find what you were searching for without scrolling down, down, down. Also, a big block of colour in the head of the page kinda detracts from the encyclopedic tone a little, IMO. AND with the 'Past Featured Article' template we've got swimming around now (though not on Nazo, someone do something about that or give me Ops plzzzzz and I'll do it!!), we ARE running into the problem I prophecised at SLJ when he asked for a Knuckles Comics banner: multiple XBOX HUEG headers on the same page. Which is a no-no from a being-able-to-see-anything point of view.

So I'd like permission to change the continuity-classification templates to cut-down ones of this nature, and run with them for a week or two to see how we like 'em. Worst comes to the worst, we can always put the big banners back in by scraping them off the History pages. Molten Scandium 15:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm glad to see that this is garnering such heated intellectual debate. -_-

Well, since I'm apparently the only one with any feelings on the issue, I'MMA GONNA GO CHANGE DEM ALL NAO!! The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 12:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

fanart

how about fanart could go at the very bottom and labeled as fanart so everyone knows its fanart? Illogic armada 20:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

No. What's the point of doing so? Images are needed to depict things. How you're suggesting it, such actions wouldn't be needed.Fairfieldfencer FFF 21:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

ok. screw my idea. youre the admin. Illogic armada 16:03, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

For the record, being an admin doesn't mean I'm the big cheese around here. You're idea's alright, but there's really no good point of having fanart in articles.Fairfieldfencer FFF 16:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

LOL, bureaucrat nao = big cheesy. - Molten Scandium 15:33, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Distilled 1337-ness

This is a walking advertisment for insomnia. Because if I'd have gone to sleep at a sensible time, I might have missed THIS:

WINNAR

Molten Scandium 03:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Pity some of those articles are epic fail.--Mystic Monkey 21:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

...well, then, perhaps you should get busy editing the fail out of them, Monkey? Molten Scandium 22:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Im on about such articles of pointless fancruft like SpongeBob, articles that were born to be doomed.--Mystic Monkey 23:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi! I'm Digipower22 (I'm a Digimon fan, but also likes Sonic and Pokemon) I have a fan character named Chance "Clawz" Cat. My friends, Digisapien and Ryushusupercat also made fanon chars. If you wanna see them, and some more of my creations, just click on the Clawz link and look at other pages at Sonic Fanon (yes there is a Sonic Fanon Wiki).

Digipower22 05:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

A Sonic Fanon Wiki? Now theres an interetsing idea. Though I still say some fan articles should be allowed on SNN, this could be useful for cleaning up SNN... a place for all the uneccisary fancruft!--Mystic Monkey 19:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

New Ideas

Idea #1: I've been thinking, and partially inspired by Alex, so, what do you guys think about a Celebration of the Month for the main page? We would have a section for something to celebrate for the month. (ie: March 2009 would be Black Knight month, where we would give a brief description of the game, and style the main page in an Authrian format.)

Idea #2: Another idea is User of the Month, where we would vote on one of the current top 10 users, as the most useful in the previous month. Then, the main page would give a brief description of the user, their time on SNN, and their future goals on SNN.

Idea #3: The next is, Fanart of the Month, where I would pick a nice tidbit of fanart for the month, and it would be used in a gallery on our mainpage, for the users to see.

Idea #4: YET another is, allowing you guys to have personal user Blogs, where you can use a page as your blog from a networking site, and allow other users to discuss you day/life.

I'm all for these ideas, and think it'd help keep SNN more lively, and enjoyable to our users, and possibly attract some new ones. So, go under the section for each, type Yes, or No, and why. All opinions are valid! SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 05:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Idea #1

• Yes: Seems like a good idea.Fairfieldfencer FFF 09:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

• No: We've already got "Featured article", which (what with its slow turnover) sorta fulfils the 'monthly' slot already. Besides, new stuff dosn't really come out so fast that we can 'celebrate' something novel each time. - Molten Scandium 13:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Reply: Actually, there's a difference. 'Featured Article', is bassically one of the best articles at the time, while this would have a special celebration theme, meaning, changing the blue border arounds us. As I said, for BK, I would change it to a stell-esque look, and have swords, such as Caliburn on it. And if we ca't get new game info, we can celebrate something from the comics, or another continuity. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 15:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Eh, dosn't sound that distinct to me. I think we'd do better to concentrate on getting the Featured Article as a real "thing" with real semi-frequent turnover, rather than spiralling off on other 'temporary themes' on a whim. - Molten Scandium 16:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Ehm. You may have a point. Better wait for other's opinions. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Idea #2

• Yes: That is a brillaint idea. Users will work harder to get their names for user of the month.Fairfieldfencer FFF 09:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

• Yes, BUT: To quote you, SLJ: Every month, I will chose the user, whom I think has done the most work, and the best work for the Wikia this month. That user will win an award, and will likely appear in the Featured Users section of the site. Please, no entering, I will select the users myself. This will begin in January 2009. . . . That never occured, did it? - Molten Scandium 13:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Reply: Urrrrrrmmmmm.....Yeah....I meant to get around to that, but, something with it kinda backfired, so....Yeah....You beat me there.... SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 15:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
    • That wasn't a "No, don't do it". It was a "Yes, BUT". I think it's a great idea; just make sure you actually DO execute it. - Molten Scandium 16:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
      • I know what you meant. But my new plans have fixed what went wrong last time. That's why it never happened... SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
        • hmmmm...this sounds like a good idea. It will encourage people to try their best at helping the wiki. --Nickno 01:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Idea #3

• Maybe: Not really sure about this one. Some fanart is nice, but it convice users to upload more fanart so it's fanart of the month. That would probably lead to IPs putting the images in articles since there is so much opportnity.Fairfieldfencer FFF 09:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
• Maybe: I have a theory on this. I like the idea, but there is one point I have to add in. As admins, you should be able to cook up some code to block IPs from adding images to mainspace pages, something like a unmarked shield on the main pages which only allows experienced users to edit, reducing those IPs to userpages. I want the idea to go ahead, due to the expected level of talent of artists amongst the more experienced members of the Wikia. Flashfire212 10:21, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Reply:What, you mean like protect all of the pages from IPs? That'd never work. A code like that can't be made, unfortunately.Fairfieldfencer FFF 10:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Reply: Nope. We aint got nothin'. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 15:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

• Yes: This can work as a method of bribing people to make good articles. A great number of folks seem to try to use this wiki as a dumping ground for their fan scrawls, which is a bad thing, but if we can say "Alright, we'll let your lame and derivative pictures have a place on the front page; but only if you impress us with the number and quality of edits you make, then we can harness people's artistic narcissism to get them to work for us. Graet success! - Molten Scandium 13:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Reply: .........****

Aight, then. I really didn't think that one through....So, nevermind this one.SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 15:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

• • • Why is this crossed?! I maintain it's a great idea; the best one out of all of them so far. If there's a way of actually HARNESSING the currently-useless (in fact, currently detrimental, 'cos we have to spend time shifting stuff to Userspace) productivity of vain fanart artists, we should do it. Do it, I say! - Molten Scandium 16:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Really? It sounded like sarcasm...Uncrossed. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
        • Misinterpretational lulz. While I do view the compulsive fanart posters with something like contempt, it remains a sad fact that they appear to account for a large proportion of the usership of this wiki. So we may as well use them, malodorous and vapid though they may be. Molten Scandium 03:20, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
          • Unfortunately, this is a sad, true fact. Perhaps it could stop any fanart from leaking into mainspace. Though, it could also, at the same time, lead to worse problems.... SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 03:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Idea #4

• Yes: Seems like an OK idea.Fairfieldfencer FFF 09:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
• No: BORING. If I wanted to hear about people's tawdry lives, I'd be reading a copy of Celebrity Gossip Weekly, not editing a Sonic wiki. - Molten Scandium 13:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Reply: I've seen it work well on other Wikia's, and I think it would drive more users here, like, peoplewho want blogs, but aren't allowed for whatever reason. While, being here for a blog, they will likely end up editing a few articles first. If this doesn't work, I can set it so ony established users may have blogs. It could tailor to the happiness of our users, and happy users, means a happy Wiki. It'd also encourage users to work together, and help eachother on projects. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 15:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Not sure ti would actually pan out as you describe, but whatever. I suppose I can always just not read them. - Molten Scandium 16:12, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
      • This is true. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

New Featured Article

I think we need a new featured article. Omega is now getting a little boring. I just don't know what featured article there is to put on there...anything? S.H. 06:50 PM, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

I feel the same way. But, Omega's the only article truly worthy of FA.....How about Sonic and the Black Knight? SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox}

Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project Solaris Project.

Just a suggestion. I'm aware SLJ expressed misgivings some time ago; so if there's anything you think I could add to make it FA-worthy, please do tell! Molten Scandium 00:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

....Slrs suxorz

In all seriousness, I think it could use a brief bio on Mephiles, and Iblis, tell more about how it fights, etc. Also, more sources, and perhaps an image of Solaris. Do that, and.....IDK SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 00:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Ya know...I think Solaris Project would be a good new Featured Article, after reading some of it! But I don't think I can do anything with the homepage, since I'm not an administrator. Can I become one, and if so...how??? S.H. 07:01 PM, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Not to beat you down with the punch hammer, but, it requires alot of serious work. I could have FFF give you rollbacks, if you can prove to be a good user? SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

LOL, I've made, like, 30 Zone articles from scratch, and I still can't get ops, Rainbowroad! 'Tis an arduous path indeed. :S

SLJ: Seriously? Isn't that what the Iblis, Mephiles, and Solaris pages are for? As I went to pains to mention in the disambiguation at the top of Solaris Project, the page is concerned with the Soleannean research organization - NOT with Solaris itself. Duplicating info like that would seem a waste of my time and the readers'... Molten Scandium 01:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Just a brief 2-3 sentences. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Weird. S.H. 07:29 PM, 07:30 PM, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

....Not....Really? SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

DONE. Now there's a redundant block of Mephiles / Iblis text sittin' there takin' up space and time. I HOPE YOU'RE HAPPY. :P Molten Scandium 01:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Nice pun. And YES. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

See here, for my nomination of Sonic 191. Sorry, Molten. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:03, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I've upgraded the FA. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 16:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

My poor baby. ;_;Fairfieldfencer FFF 16:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

hehehehehe *Performs Judge Heather James evil fake smile* SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 16:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!1!!one!1!eleven!!1

*sniff* Molten Scandium 19:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Help the Sonic News Network!

I've just had an idea that would both help the SNN and possibly boost the number of editors. We make something similar to another idea I had. A topic on a Sonic forum that asks people if they can help us. They find out about the SNN, decide to come here, and we get help for the articles in the process. For example, Molten Scandium recently said he needed images of Metropolis for the article. I've seen one before, but can't remember where. I ask in the topic, a Sonic fan who knows where it is gets it, and there's a chance they look up the SNN and decide to join. What do you think?Fairfieldfencer FFF 12:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I wander around the Sonic Stadium with a prominent SNN link in my sig, but I fear to do any more since I've seen Flyboy Fox slap other people down for "advertising" on the boards.

Also, this is a question that's been buggin me for a while. WHY are there seperate wikis for Archie Sonic and... us? Half our Archie articles use the exact same media piped from said Archie wiki. Seems a grotesquely inefficient duplication of resources. Molten Scandium 14:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

That's mainly because Marvel and DC editor copies their articles and puts them here. As for why there is, it's because the creator, Thot Prad, asked for it. I know him. He has an incredible knowledge of Archie Sonic. The Archie Sonic Wiki uses it's own sourcing system and has different rules. He's a bloody good editor to say the least. He's kept that wiki in an incredibly good condition. Always kept on top of things, made sure no vandalsim was left in the articles. There's nothing stopping him or anybody from making another Sonic Wiki. I've been curious how you make them. I've often thought about making a Sonic X Wiki should I find out how.Fairfieldfencer FFF 14:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

And a heroic man the DC Editor is for his efforts, too. Don't make me look at you ANGRILY, FFF. As my userpage states, I'm a fervid champion of having all Sonic information on one site. Ve Must Have Ze Gleischaltung!!!

Anyway, in other news:

File:SonicAdv2Gold.png

SUMMER OF SONIC 2009 - London, UK, Saturday 29th August The world's first and only Sonic fan convention is coming back for a second year!! See the wiki page or the Sonic Stadium sign-up board for more info!

File:SonicAdv2Gold.png

Front page? I've messaged Dreadknux to ask if he's got any fancier advertising banners, but (A) until he gets back to me, and (B) since I fully expect the answer "no", methinks this could serve for now. - Molten Scandium 15:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Molten is like SNN's failure, that ended up full of win. For this, I praise him.

Nice template, btw. I'll place it on the front page.

Anywho, I don't think that'll work too well, FFF. What I think we need to do is get popular fansites to place banners to SNN on the front page. Even place links on YouTube could help. Put links in our sigs on fourms. Stuff like that. Try to get the word out. But I guess we'll see...... SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 16:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

It seems an ad is blocking some of it.... /: Wish I could get rid of those..... SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 16:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

SKJCOAAATR 1, Are you from London? 'Cause I wouldn't be able to go to this summer convention sonic thingy since it says, "LONDON, UK." I live in America. It seems like most of us do. S.H. 11:54 AM, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

SLJ lives in an outhouse / train station in Pennsylvania. Unlike me and FFF, who live on the Rainy Island and thus will be able to go for scant expense. Yay! ^^ Molten Scandium 17:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Is that really true??? S.H. 12:03 PM, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

No it isn't.

I'm from Liverpool, England. London is quite far away from here, but maybe I'll ask my parents to take me, but I don't think they'd like it.

And Molten, please don't speak German to me again. I did some studying about what they did during the world wars and... well, I don't need to say anymore than that.Fairfieldfencer FFF 18:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

LOL, anti-Germanism. :D

And by "the Rainy Island" I did mean Britain. The last time I checked, that's where Liverpool is... OR IS IT? Molten Scandium 19:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey, wait a minute: "Molten is like SNN's failure, that ended up full of win." I say, old bean, are you implying that I started out full of fail? ;_; Molten Scandium 19:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

No. I'm not. I'm saying that you fail so hard, you win. Cheers.

Ay. I've lived in houses, dumps, mansions, holes, trailers, backyards, hills, outhouses, train stations, hotels, shacks, rundown abandoned places, stores, and schools. But enough of that. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 19:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I am not Anti-German. I just dislike the Nazis. The entire bloody world did during the early 1900s. If I met a German fella who was nice I'd like him, I wouldn't say "Sod off, Fritzy!" as soon as I lay my eyes on him. I've just read and seen a lot about what the Nazis did. Starving people in concentation camps. A mad doctor conducting God almighty experiments on people. Some of the stuff I've learned will surely haunt me to my grave.Fairfieldfencer FFF 20:18, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I like how a topic about advertising became a topic about why we like /dislike Germans / Nazis. But, t'wev. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 20:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry. I just don't want people thinking I'm a racist when I'm not. I just have some... strong feelings towards the subject.Fairfieldfencer FFF 20:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Ich werde versucht, alles auf Deutsch jetzt zu schreiben. LOLLEN! Molten Scandium 23:57, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

bitte nicht. Jeder muß sonst verstehen, was Sie sagen.Fairfieldfencer FFF 00:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

...*Sigh* Language people. Use it in English, please....Aaaaannyways, the hell are you doing up so late, FFF? Isn't it, like, 1am for you? You're not known for being awake, and online at that time. I am. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 00:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm in the same time zone as 3-F's, y'know. I'm just a chronic insomniac. Hehehe. Molten Scandium 00:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, that's nice for you. I'm just nocturnal. Now, enough random talk, about nothing to do with advertising for SNN. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

My mother let me stay up late because my birthday's tomorrow.Fairfieldfencer FFF 07:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Can you tell us how old yr turning or are you keeping your age a secret like me? S.H. 10:11 AM, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll be turning 14 this Monday.Fairfieldfencer FFF 16:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Sweet. This is all I'm telling you...I am a couple years younger than you. Yeah, you probably know how old I am now. S.H. 10:15 AM, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Depends on what age your refering to. If you mean my current you'd be 11, but if you mean my new you'd be 12.Fairfieldfencer FFF 16:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

←Hey! I turned my sig on SSMB into an advertisement for SNN and I got a new user already.Fairfieldfencer FFF 11:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

WELL. Evidently you're more e-popular than me. W_W Molten Scandium 12:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Have you typed me in Google? Anyway, it doesn't matter how popular you arem just how much you post. The secret is, post, post and post again!Fairfieldfencer FFF 13:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

This is what I said.Fairfieldfencer FFF 13:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Join the Sonic News Network today!

Join the Sonic News Network, a brilliant wiki with fascinating facts on Sonic. But we need your help to get more facts. Show how much of a Sonic genius you are by coming here today and telling everybody everything you know about Sonic in our articles. Our friendly top editors will be happy to show you the routes of things and how to make spectacular articles. Contact Fairfieldfencer when you get there and he'll design the signature of your choice in all sorts of shapes, sizes and colours.

Contact me for more details.

Very nice, Triple F. I'm gonna make "We want you!"-esque thing, for Youtube, and get it placed on IGN, and other gaming fourms. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 16:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

SoS Banner

Don't worry, everyone! I saved the day. *smug*

But seriously. Does it work now in everyone's browser? It looks fine in mine, but it might be different for those of us with larger /smaller monitors... Molten Scandium 18:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Not in mine. I used a Wikipedia/Monobook skin. Like this.Fairfieldfencer FFF 18:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

MY EYES! ZE GOGGLES DO NOTHING!!

Hmm. Well, then. This raises problems. Molten Scandium 18:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Looks fine to me, in everything. Good job. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 16:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'll be damned. Dreadknux DID get back to me, and it was in the affirmative. He alleges he might have some advertising banners ready in a couple 'o days.

What a nice chap. Don't know whether they'll FIT, or not, giving the misfortune we're still having with the one I made m'self, but we shall see, I guess. Molten Scandium 19:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Worst comes the worst, we'll re-size it. And by we, I mean you. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 00:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

You'd think someone would give me ops for all this grunt-work I'm doing... *mutter* *grumble*... Molten Scandium 01:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

IN OTHER NEWS, can anyone give me a count of the number of Eggman robots that are KNOWN to have gone rogue in the game continuity? I count (in chronological order):

• E-102 Gamma
• Metal Sonic
• E-123 Omega
• Gemerl

Any more, anyone? Molten Scandium 01:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

......You can consider one to be Emerl, or even Shadow? The whole E-Series kinda did...But those are all debatable. Same for SA-55/Ergo, or whatever his name is. SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 01:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Everyone forgets Heavy and Bomb. Myself 123 15:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Wait.........Who? lol jk SLJCOAAATR the SNN Admin ^{Careful, it's a Faradox} 23:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey, Great Work!

I dropped in to take a nostalgic look around just now to see what's been up here since I've been gone, and I have to say, it looks excellent! The Archie comic articles and Solaris Project especially impressed me, as well as the increased number of contributors and contributions. And thanks for the 4 votes for February's user of the month despite having not done anything since January :P Seriously, though, I think it should be all of you who have kept this wiki going thriving. I'm still to busy to help much, but count me as a fan!
~ FerralMoonrender 06:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, I had a whole big nice reply. Then I got a 404 error. Now I'm too lazy to retype it... -_-; SLJCOAAATR ^{4 6 8 15 16 23 42 108 305 316} 17:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

On another topic; just so everyone knows I've done something to make Dimitri stop his bitching (LOL, jk):

This page started life a Mobius Encyclopaedia article, so credit where credit's due. Don't be afraid to re-write sections in a more Sonic-News-Network-y style!

F-pow. Get it pinned where it needs pinning. 'Cos I'm gonna go rustle up some none-shoddy Casino Night Zone pics instead. The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 14:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Should we...

As we say we have 2 "sister wikis" should we add in the "Sonic Fanon" site. Most of you have checked it out, right? S.H. 05:47 PM, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll add it in a few minutes. SLJCOAAATR ^{4 6 8 15 16 23 42 108 305 316} 22:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

bizzare event

do you think its really strange that we only knew each other a week and we're already close friends or is it just me?--Sonicman0123456789 18:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)sonicman0123456789

Where is it?

SLJ, you said you'd put that thing in a few minutes. Oh well, it's your choice if you want it in there or not. --S.H. 00:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Slipped my mind. Sorry..... SLJCOAAATR ^{4 6 8 15 16 23 42 108 305 316} 02:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikia

What's with the Wikia robot? I mean it praises people if they do any edit (including vandelism, uploading pics, talk pages and forums) and it's impersonating you admins! it should somthing like "talk to such n such" not pose as somone they're not! Myself 123 21:08, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Bots will be bots.... /:

Unfortunatley, we (As in the admins (As in me, FFF, Molten, Mystic, Nav, Ferral, etc.)) have no control over Wikia the Bot. It's programmed by the "Higher Ups", as I call them. You know, the gang from Wikia Central (ie: Kirk, Angela, Avatar, etc.) to do such. Why they programmed it to impersonate admins, I'll never know. I guess to prevent "OMGZ I WENT TO ASK WIKIA BUT IT NEVER TOLD ME MY ANSWER", but in that case, as you pointed out, why not program it to say "For more information, go to 'so, and so'."? While I'm a little angered about this, I'll let it slide without complaints. Let's just keep quiet, and appreciate that they remembered we exist, or realised that we weren't blown to death years ago. SLJCOAAATR ^{4 6 8 15 16 23 42 108 305 316} 21:28, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah i guess your right. Myself 123 21:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Eclipse Cannon

Someone needs to fix the counting error at Exlipse Cannon. 1+1+1+3 does not equal 5! I don't know what it should be, but someone here does. I know it! ~Glow~

New Wiki request

I've already contacted myself 123. He was the first to contact me, so I wasn't sure who else to go to. I was wondering about a new wiki request. It's a pure site for fan ideas and archives purely fan made. I even have a title- Galactic Alliance Classified Files: A Brainstorming Network of Shocking Proportions. Fans can get on and post articles about anything they want. Any new ideas, stories, characters, anything. It would of course all come from imagination. I know there are a lot of fans out there who are dying do share their ideas with other fans just as badly as myself. I even have an article ready to post. I would really like it.--Galactic Alliance Classified Files "administrator" 14:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

There's already one like that. Well, there's two that I know of. one is exclusively Sonic, there's a link to it on the main page, and another called the Fanfiction Wiki.Fairfieldfencer FFF 17:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

featured user

how do you vote for featured user? Myself 123 11:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I think after the debacle last time, SLJ's just picking them by fiat. Because democracy sux! The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 11:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

yay! i've been nominated for featured user! though it looks like Mystic gonna win. But check it out, i'm the only non-admin there. ;) Myself 123 20:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

whoopa! lets sa go!

Now, is it just me, or is there a little bit too much Mario related stuff here? I think we should get rid of most of the articles (i think we should keep the Mario page) and when mario stuff is on articles, we put a link to either wikipedia or the Mario wiki. Myself 123 22:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I concur entirely. Why people upload this stuff to a Sonic Wiki is beyond me. The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 22:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

It's like there's a Mario virus seeping it's way into this wiki. Also, at the top of the Mario page there should be somthing like "for more information, see somthing-or-other". Myself 123 22:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I am in the middle of writing an intricate piece of AoStH-themed fanfic at the moment, Myself, so I ain't gonna go round purging the Italian-ness off the wiki right now... but if you feel inquisatorial enough to go find the offending pieces and tag them with the {{delete}} tag, I shall get to them in due course. @_@ The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 22:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

K, i shall go forth, and if i can, i'll find a Mario wiki and link stuff to that. Myself 123 22:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

I suggest a single page for Nintendo, including info about all Nintendo characters (perhaps in a list) with heavy links to Wikipedia or a specialist Nintendo/Mario wiki. On our wiki, pages such as Mario would redirect to this central Nintendo hub. We (i.e. you) would delete relevant (i.e. irrelevant) categories. What do you think? -- Supermorff 18:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

For now, I think we should delete anything non-Sonic, and bring them back at a later point. They can serve some relevance, seing as Sonic may've interacted with them at some point (SSBB, MASATOG, or MASATOWG.) It's something we should keep in the back of our minds, but not a major priority at the moment. Maybe once we get a good grip on things. For the few we have now, how about a template stating that they're from such-and-such series, and most of the information in the article has no relation to Sonic? SLJCOAAATR / ^Soul 22:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

The article content will make the tenuous-ness of the relationship clear, I would think?

I must say, my main objection to the Mario articles is not so much that they are irrelevant, but that they are very poorly made. Indeed, in many cases, they aren't irrelevant. Much as I might personally dislike the fact, Mario and Sonic do interact in officially-produced crossover, and the datum that "Tails has a rivalry with Yoshi in Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games" (which I seem to recall deleting yesterday, along with the entire Yoshi page) MIGHT actually be relevant for someone researching a fanfic - should anyone be so inclined to write Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games fanfiction. And as such, we probably should host it.

So I'll vote for something a little like SuperMoff's proposal, though perhaps not quite as "blanket" as Nintendo. Redirect everything Mario-related to a "Mario (series)" page, and within the "Mario (series)" page, let the Italian fanbois go into essentially however much detail they want. If it's only one page, we don't really have to worry about it that much, and we can always prune the thing as and when expedient to cull out blatantly non-Sonic info.

I'm somewhat biased in this sense, because I wrote the entire article, but take a look at Ulala. That, I think, is what we want to be aiming for regarding the level of info on non-canon characters. Most importantly, it's NEAT; formatted, with pictures and links, a brief description of Ulala as she relates to her universe, and then a section regarding her interaction with Sonic.

My 2c. The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 00:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Or until we get more important priorities finished, we could redirect to either thier Wikipedia, r Mario Wiki articles? SLJCOAAATR / ^Soul

04:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

If you create redirects to external sites, even other wikis, the software counts it as a Double Redirect, which is both confusing and irritating. For example, see Luigi, which someone should probably delete. -- Supermorff 07:15, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Quite. It seems redirects of this nature are not beloved by the wiki. The correct procedure will be to replace every instance of [[Luigi]] with [[wikipedia:Luigi]], which does do it right. The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 11:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Sidebar

Most of the links on the sidebar to this wiki don't go anywhere. Some of them have places that they should go, but instead they point to differently-named pages that don't exist. I can't edit it (and probably wouldn't understand the markup even if I could), so could an admin please have a look? It would be much appreciated.

Other people have noticed too: see the apparent vandalism on News Page:New Updates, which is only linked to from that sidebar. -- Supermorff 11:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

If it would help, here's a quick list of some of the links that need fixing:

• "Sonic Characters > Sonic X Characters" --> Category:Sonic X characters
• "Sonic Characters > Archie" --> Category:SatAM and Archie characters
• "Sonic Characters > Fleetway" --> Category:Sonic the Comic characters
• All of the characters under "Sonic Characters > Fleetway" should have (Sonic the Comic) as parentheses, rather than (Fleetway). For example, Sonic the Hedgehog (Sonic the Comic) not Sonic the Hedgehog (Fleetway).
• "Sonic Characters > Sonic Underground" --> Category:Sonic Underground characters
• "Sonic Characters > Sonic Underground > Heroes > Aleena the Hedgehog" --> Queen Aleena the Hedgehog
• "Sonic Characters > Adventures Of Sonic The Hedgehog" --> Category:Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog characters
• "Sonic Characters > Adventures Of Sonic The Hedgehog > Villains > Dr. Robotnik (Adventures)" --> Doctor Ivo Robotnik (Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog)
• "Categories" --> Special:Categories
• "Categories > Characters" --> Category:Characters

-- Supermorff 11:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

I am well aware of the problem, but thanks for pointing it out, in-case I didn't know. ;) :P This is something that I'll be getting to in due time. Unfortunately, I'm rather busy at the moment. Once things clear up, I have big plans for SNN, and will be fixing things up as much as possible. SLJCOAAATR / ^Soul 20:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Argh! Now someone has created Category:Sonic X Characters, despite the fact that we already have a decent category for that already. All because of a dead link from that sidebar. Can someone please delete this category and fix those links in the sidebar? Please? I can't do it myself because I'm not an admin (see how I worked that in there)? I've updated the list above so you know what needs fixing. -- Supermorff 11:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

I've now fixed the links, although I haven't changed the structure of it. -- Supermorff 12:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Clock

Dose anyone know how to change time on the wikia clock? i've been a hour out since the clocks went forward and it's realy bugging me. Myself 123 00:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Same here. But nopes, I don't gots a clue. :( The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 00:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Dose this mean i have to go to the heads at central wikia? Those people are scary compared to tiny 'ittle users like me, i bet they could eraze from existance with just a thought. Myself 123 00:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

*Phew* I'm not the only one who's scared of the "Superiors" :S

Sadly, I have no idea. Mine's been using military time on me since I joined. I've learned to cope. SLJCOAAATR Soul 03:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

What clock? You mean the one on the watchlists? Just go to my preferences and fix the clock under the time and date section.Fairfieldfencer FFF 07:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Never thought of that. Thanks! Myself 123 11:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh, the British lad! Always dealing with the obvious that I miss. I'll get him yet. SLJCOAAATR Soul 14:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Don't bet on it, yer "yankee"!Fairfieldfencer FFF 16:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

I hate the Yankees. Matter of fact, I hate baseball as a whole. I also hate all other sports. So there, you terrible brittish pirate. SLJCOAAATR Soul 17:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Yarh! Avast ye landlubba! Err, i be a pirate! Umm, fire the starboard cannon me-hearties! Yarh! Myself 123 23:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Sadly, this is the best internet pirate I've ever seen. SLJCOAAATR Soul 23:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, i'm an awsome pirate. Myself 123 23:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Categories for fan articles

I don't mind fan characters having pages, as long as they are restricted to userspace. However, I do sometimes get annoyed when fan characters appear in categories along with canon articles. Does anyone else think that? Can I propose that we implement a rule that fan characters (which should be consigned to userspace anyway) cannot be included in categories? Or, if this is too strong, that they can only be included in special, set-aside categories (e.g. "Category:User characters" instead of "Category:Characters")? I'd love to get some feedback on this.

Also, for anyone that's interested, there's a discussion going on at Sonic News Network:Community Portal#Categories about over-categorization of characters. I'd love feedback on that as well. -- Supermorff 01:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Fan characters should VERY MUCH NOT appear in the real character categories. In fairness, I don't think we should have all these "Characters who can fly", "Characters with super speed" categories anyway, but SLJ started making them and I didn't want to get into a bureaucrat vs. bureaucrat fight...

BUT ENOUGH OF MY PROBLEMS. I'd go for a solution like Morffs, but maybe specify that userspace articles of any kind should have no categories at all. After all, this is an official info wiki, and even if it wasn't, no-one really needs to be able to sort / categorise fancharacters, or stuff that's in Userspace in general. Userspace is supposed to be like your own personal scrapbook; it's not supposed to be an Encyclopedia itself.

In the long-term, I think there are 2 solutions to the creep of Userspace / fancharacter mess. My preferred solution is to burn every single fanon article from the site, be it in Userspace or not. But I think I'd see mass rebellion, so the OTHER solution is that someone needs to write a "Fancharacters on the Sonic Wiki" style guide, explaining the kind of category / no category / not in mainspace / no links in mainspace / etc. rules we're laying down. Pin it to the front page, nice and publicly, and then just go tell people to read and obey. If they don't, baleet their hackneyed Fanchara article. The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 01:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Well you wouldn't get a rebellion from me, but I do see what you're saying. Any such style guide (good idea, by the way) would also need pretty heavy links to the Sonic Fanon Wiki, or perhaps the Archie Sonic Fanon Wiki (or both). The ideal solution for everyone would be for the fanmade articles to still exist, just on those other wikis and not here. But that requires encouraging users to migrate, which is difficult.

Still, until someone does create a style guide like that (or, say, adds a few extra rules to Sonic News Network:About), do I have permission to edit userspace fan articles in order to remove categories? -- Supermorff 11:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

If you hate yourself enough to delve into the seedy underbelly of the Userspace Fanon Article Mess, then certainly feel free to do so. You'd probably better pen a concise form of the above rationalisations in the edit summaries, though, or you'll attract an incensed mob of fancharacter creators roid-raging at you for tinkering with "their" Userspaces. The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 15:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

there are probily some fan articles that were made by users who aen't even active around here anymore. Myself 123 15:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Granted, but it's not like the Internet is getting full and we need to create more space. As I said, for the sake of neatness, indiscriminate deletion is my preferred option, but at the same time I realise it's true that a Userspace fancharacter article quietly tucked away in a corner somewhere isn't hurting anyone. Maybe some day we can audit every page on the whole site and cull the stuff that's forgotten and unloved, but I have to confess that it's not high on my priority list.

But hey, if you feel like plumbing Userspace for the aforementioned forgotten pages, feel free to do so and mark 'em with delete templates. Every little helps! :) The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 15:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Excellent. -- Supermorff 21:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Done. I've removed the categories from any fan article I could find (by searching through all the category subcats), and left a message on all of their talk pages. Would someone ask SLJ to take his user page out of Category:Males? -- Supermorff 22:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

With my mighty Ops powers I can (and have) screwed with his Userspace myself. Although I also note with consternation that he has a billion Userspace-specific (and even personalised) categories down at the bottom of his page... X_X The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 23:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

That's great, thank you. -- Supermorff 11:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey, Wait a minute!

Why isn't my wiki in the news? It is a sister wiki after all.--Akamia^{(Talk)(Want to see what I've been doing?)} 10:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

He has a point. but as of now it is very small.--Skylerthewasp 19:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Why is the underlying nowiki tags still in place? Tch.

Please remove the crap posted above. It is on the main page. It serves no purpose.--Launchballer 17:08, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Typo

On the main page, "There are 1,663 articles and growing since this wiki was founded in September 2005 ." it shouldn't have a space just before the fullstop, could someone fix that?--Launchballer 16:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

And i shall, thanks, nice catch. Myself 123 16:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for that.--Launchballer 16:40, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Er, excuse me, someone has spelt deletion as deleteion. Can I suggest someone fixes that, please?--Launchballer 20:55, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

My mistake. Sorry. Getting on it now. SLJCOAAATR Soul 21:13, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I ought to pore over it thoroughly to find any others.--Launchballer 17:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Feel free, though I don't believe that there are any others. SLJCOAAATR Soul 21:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

A character of storys

I Need Help desideing which sonic the Hedgehog Character to do a Story on on Sonic Fanon.--Shadow night

Write a story about Metal Sonic's cybernetic epiphany to return to The Doctor's service after Sonic Heroes; while in the custody of Shadow and Omega. SORTED. The Doctor... IS IN ^{Molten Scandium} 02:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)