Talk: Dark Gaia (Archie)

This talk page is for discussing improvements to the Dark Gaia (Archie) page

This page is not for general discussions of the article's subject.
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Be polite and welcoming to new users
Assume good faith
Avoid personal attacks

Profile picture[]

By the same logic applied to how Dark Gaia's is infobox can be given its immature form as its profile picture, then shouldn't the main series' Dark Gaia's infobox have its immature form as its profile picture too? Just like how the intro page in StH 287 designated the immature form as "Dark Gaia", the Bestiary in the Xbox 360/PS3 designated the immature form as "Dark Gaia" too.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 20:03, October 13, 2016 (UTC)

I wouldn't mind that, but from what I think about; that Dark Gaia is "Dark Gaia" in both its immature and perfect form, several clues on the script of Sonic Unleashed and the Wii version suggests that it can differ between whatever version you play. If you play the non-hd version, Dark Gaia's battle is just "Dark Gaia". Dark Gaia and its full form are named "Dark Gaia" and "Perfect Dark Gaia" on the HD version.

I would stick with the storyline rather than what gameplay gives, as it can be revoked, but the storyline is the same. Still, there is no hard feeling if you change it back. Though, I see it the best thing we do to make it acceptable for both versions if the tabber is not permitted to do so.--Luma.dash (talk) 20:19, October 13, 2016 (UTC)

It is just that I see no difference between the bestiary and the intro page. Like you say, gameplay is fickle and so the boss fight designations differ. However, to my understanding, the bestiary is something outside the gameplay, as its info is clearly not meant for gameplay.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 20:24, October 13, 2016 (UTC)

That's acceptable. Just like the many times Sega contradicted itself.--Luma.dash (talk) 20:27, October 13, 2016 (UTC)