|
This article looks very nice, and reads even better. It explains the mechanics of the game and how to play it very well, has plenty of pictures, and has a good amount of interesting trivia. Also, i love the table that was made for the characters. And look at how much information is in the infobox! This article needs to be nominated for all the work that has been done on it. SilverPlays97 (Wall) (Contributions) 11:03, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
Support
- This is amazing to read through. Some articles are nice to read until I come across a sentence that doesn't make any sense, and other articles just don't flow well. This article, however, communicates ideas clearly without disrupting the flow of the article. The only reason I would oppose is because the red links look ugly. But that's not a problem with this specific article, and I bet we can create these pages fairly quickly. Twinkle Snow Unleash Christmas 201312:38, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
- I was originally going to oppose this, but then I read the article for myself. The red links need to go, so I will take care of it (if I can :P). BlueSpeeder (talk) 17:55, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
- --Bullet Francisco (talk) Contributions Editcount 02:36, June 25, 2013 (UTC)
- This sounds like an awesome idea! A lot of people like this game. Screenpenguin (talk) 22:09, June 27, 2013 (UTC) Pipko411
Oppose
- The article's writing doesn't quite reach its full potential. Some sentences could be revised (notably ones that speak towards the reader), the general layout of headers and information seems to be in an improper order, and there are a total of eight red links that desperately require their own respective pages. This article doesn't seem good enough to be featured, in my opinion. Serious Sam
 Heavy 12:50, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
Discussion
- The general layout of headers looks fine to me. And if you see sentences that need revising, I would suggest that you revise them yourself in case others miss them. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 19:41, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
- No, they were not. I changed them. I'm still considering whether or not "Characters" should be a sub-header of "Plot" but whatever, it doesn't really make too big of a difference. The main problem I have with the article is word choice. Certain sentences could have been worded better than they are. --Bullet Francisco (talk) Contributions Editcount 07:14, June 14, 2013 (UTC)
- I have made pages for all the red links. Only problem is i couldn't find any info about the people, and i'm supposed to be good at this!!! SilverPlays97 (Wall) (Contributions) 13:57, June 9, 2013 (UTC)
- The page looks a lot better now. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 14:41, June 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Closely, but there could be mentioned about the game's revision, that has numerous level layout and gameplay mechanic changes. Video about the gameplay here for those who are interested, but I can handle that section. - MarioSonic (talk) 16:42, June 19, 2013 (UTC)
Conclusion
This will be the next Featured Article. Nice work fixing up the article, everyone. --Bullet Francisco (talk) Contributions Editcount 08:23, June 29, 2013 (UTC)
|
