The whole conversation about the thread is wrong. And sorry to say this, but we have really entered personal conflictions, not for finding a way to solve the problem here (by using vulgar language and blaming others for it). If we were to discuss such a topic on a thread, we should lay the problem on the table, and then the solutions to resolve it.
Not start it with the "Removal of Featured User section", because this just covers whether you want or not to support it. And of course you'll got opposers, because you are throwing the solution.
I expected the thread to present solutions, not one direction.
Luma.dash wrote:
The whole conversation about the thread is wrong. And sorry to say this, but we have really entered personal conflictions, not for finding a way to solve the problem here (by using vulgar language and blaming others for it). If we were to discuss such a topic on a thread, we should lay the problem on the table, and then the solutions to resolve it.
Not start it with the "Removal of Featured User section", because this just covers whether you want or not to support it. And of course you'll got opposers, because you are throwing the solution.
I expected the thread to present solutions, not one direction.
"And of course you'll get opposers"
Tell me, where are these supposed "opposers" in this thread? All I see is clear community consensus to remove the Featured User section. The "solution" you desire is removing the Featured User interview altogether, according to community consensus.
I meant that we entered a lot of unnecessary conflictions. The number of supporters is high as you say, but there are also sounds that do not want to be removed it entirely, like Ultra, me and about two-three more.
At the time (No offense), but Journalistic is just arguing with whoever reasons in the thread, leading to some grim and unneeded conflictions.
Luma.dash wrote: I meant that we entered a lot of unnecessary conflictions. The number of supporting is high as you say, but there are also sounds that do not want to be removed it entirely, like Ultra, me and about two-three more.
At the time Journalistic is just arguing with whoever reasons in the thread, leading to some grim conflictions.
Why exactly do you want the featured user interview to remain? From purely a design perspective, it looks stupid on the front page. It's a giant wall of text that most random viewers wouldn't care for. The main page looks much better without it.
Also, Journalistic isn't doing anything objectionable, I don't see why you felt the need to call out him alone. That was unnecessary and is probably going to lead to the conflict you are trying to avoid.
Luma.dash wrote: I meant that we entered a lot of unnecessary conflictions. The number of supporting is high as you say, but there are also sounds that do not want to be removed it entirely, like Ultra, me and about two-three more.
At the time Journalistic is just arguing with whoever reasons in the thread, leading to some grim conflictions.
Also, Journalistic isn't doing anything objectionable, I don't see why you felt the need to call out him alone. That was unnecessary and is probably going to lead to the conflict you are trying to avoid.
As I said above, this is my own personal view. If it is decided that all people want it to be deleted, then I'll go with that. I just find it can be better in another way. And he deems things unnecessary in time we need every help.
Luma.dash wrote:
Luma.dash wrote: I meant that we entered a lot of unnecessary conflictions. The number of supporting is high as you say, but there are also sounds that do not want to be removed it entirely, like Ultra, me and about two-three more.
At the time Journalistic is just arguing with whoever reasons in the thread, leading to some grim conflictions.
Also, Journalistic isn't doing anything objectionable, I don't see why you felt the need to call out him alone. That was unnecessary and is probably going to lead to the conflict you are trying to avoid.
As I said above, this is my own personal view. If it is decided that all people want it to be deleted, then I'll go with that. I just find it can be better in another way. And he deems things unnecessary in time we need every help.
I am not saying that you cannot have that view, I am asking you WHY you have that view. I wish to understand your perspective, and I kindly ask that you explain it to me.
Gee, you are against "grim and unneeded conflictions", yet go out of your way to start beef with Journalistic? You aren't practicing what you preach, Luma. Calling him out was just as grim and unneeded as everything you had pointed out yourself.
Luma.dash wrote:
Luma.dash wrote: I meant that we entered a lot of unnecessary conflictions. The number of supporting is high as you say, but there are also sounds that do not want to be removed it entirely, like Ultra, me and about two-three more.
At the time Journalistic is just arguing with whoever reasons in the thread, leading to some grim conflictions.
Also, Journalistic isn't doing anything objectionable, I don't see why you felt the need to call out him alone. That was unnecessary and is probably going to lead to the conflict you are trying to avoid.
Gee, you are against "grim and unneeded conflictions", yet go out of your way to start beef with Journalistic? You aren't practicing what you preach, Luma. Calling him out was just as grim and unneeded as everything you had pointed out yourself.
Journalistic wrote: It has now been 3 days. There's an overwheming amount of support. Any last comments before I close the thread?
I support it