@Nathanthehazingdaze007 That's not true. If you believe that, then you've quit. I stand by what I've said. Take this statement from Mark Crilley, someone who help me at the beginning of my drawing phase:

"If comparing your art to other people is bringing you down, stop doing it. Your work doesn't need to win contests, impress people, or be 'conventionally beautiful'."

The Levels in Drawings is an outdated concept to me. I struggled with fitting multiple characters on a page, and with advice from WyvernSilver and believing in myself that I'd get better, I started improving. Even someone with a disability can still draw. I was reading this Reddit thread. One user mentioned her friend's colorblind. Despite that, she developed her own bright and unique art style.

AI Art is art, but it lacks one crucial element that sets it apart from traditional art: feelings. People who use mobians.ai or Sonic Diffusion are missing out on the fun of drawing and self-accomplishment. They're innovative tools, but it's not the same as getting out a blank canvas and sketching your ideas. Many users who do use AI have creative ideas, but it would be more appealing and satisfying if they draw it themselves. AI can't replicate that personal touch.

I'd say I oppose, even if I have been here for a week at most do my vote probably has no relevance. From what I've seen, AI Art is just made for fun in the wiki, and actual artists who post their own art tend to get many more upvotes or whatever, so it's not like it's threatening artists in the Wikia anyway

You could make the argument for other parts of the internet being affected, but honestly that shouldn't be our issue, we're just a little niche of the internet that's not even affected by AI Art

@SplashFactor I don't think anyone's arguing that it doesn't have the personal touch of non-AI art. But that's simply not a good enough reason to ban it entirely, which was the original suggestion. The implication there is that it isn't as good, which is true. But where does that leave bad artists? Should they be banned too? Why's having AI art and criticising it worse than not having it at all?

@FH2104 I didn't vote because I know there are users here who do appreciate AI Art and what it can do. However, this statement made by Flash-Gold-Echo bugged me a bit.

"It is the future, whether you like it or not. Humans will not need to apply for artist jobs and it will become just a hobby, whereas everyone else will use AI art. Also, it's fun to use and is already better than every human." 

I won't lie; this statement right here is wrong. Look at Tyson Hesse, Adam Bryce Thomas, Evan Stanley, and many of the artists that do Sonic-related media. AI, while a helpful tool, can't replicate the hard work these or anyone puts into their work. It is part of the future, and it's interesting, but it shouldn't take over people's livelihoods. I said what I need to say above, but this comment here isn't cool. Also, there's no such thing as a bad artist. People who say that need to open their eyes and see what they can do. Everyone can draw and has their unique style. Keep improving and practicing, and you'll see results.

I'm not sure about the Discord Server because it's its own thing. But in regard to Discussions, I think using it simply for fun, as other people stated above, is fine. Not all people have a talent for art (I as an example, do not have), some may have some kind of disability, etc. So, as long as the one creating the art is attributed, it should be fine to be posted on Discussions.

@SplashFactor Yeah, I am aware that AI cannot replace the personal touch of someone's creativity, but that doesn't mean AI can't be useful in helping people. Yes, people can draw, but some choose not to. We are the ones who write down the ideas on how to use AI art. We are the ones who still use endless amounts of creativity. And again, you aren't understanding this: not everyone can draw due to things like mental or physical disabilities. I am typing an idea for something, and I am still using my creativity to make something. I don't need a piece of paper and a pencil to create something with emotion. I can create emotion with clay, writing, or filmography. Sure, it might NOT be made with the personal touch of me drawing, but that's not a reason to ban AI art. I am tired of people saying, 'Oh, now technology is going to replace all creativity,' when no, it's just a new way to express it. I don't know if I can explain it to you better, but my answer is still no to AI being banned.

@Flash-Gold-Echo dude I warned you (joke)

@Nathanthehazingdaze007 You mentioned that people without arms can't draw. If they had to experience that, my condolences to them. However, with today's technology, robotic arms can still allow people to draw physically instead of relying on AI. A disability doesn't stop you from drawing. Kenzcoolz has a disability where she can't speak very well, yet she's drawing and having fun with it. When I'm talking about drawing, I'm talking about various mediums (vector drawings, painting, clay, etc.). Everyone can draw; it all depends on your motivation and if it aligns with your interests. If people aren't interested in drawing, that's totally fine. Drawing isn't a hobby for everyone. I've said this already; I'm not voting because I know users like using AI to express their creativity, and as Luma said, if it's for fun, fine. However, I don't like the reasoning of what some users are saying AI is better than any human artist, or there's no need to draw because of AI can do it for them. AI is a helpful tool, I won't deny it, but if it takes away that learning and interactive experience, it's not right to me.

Oppose

Wait, there's a SWZ discord?