99.9% of AI art is completely harmless. It's simply a tool, and there's no reason to ban it. Yes, it should be labelled. Yes, it's usually obvious because it looks wrong. No, it doesn't threaten actual artists for as long as at least one of those things is still true. There are better ways of supporting artists than taking the tool away from someone who can't do it themselves.

@SplashFactor Not everyone has the time, patience, or motivation to learn how to draw. A lot of people struggle and eventually give up. Some people are too busy with their lives doing other things, and don’t have time to practice a lot. And getting good at drawing can take a really long time for alot of people. And a lot of hard work and dedication. It doesn’t work out for everyone. With ai, people can put together their ideas without the struggle of the lack of their drawing ability. They can create art without putting in years of effort, making things easier. It did not take me a long time to get okay at drawing, but I still think people who struggle and are unable to learn how to draw because of how busy they are, or their patience level still deserve a chance.

@Vernyou That's the problem. If you give up in an instant, it's like you never started in the first place. I was like that; I used to dislike writing in high school, didn't care to turn in papers on time, didn't put much effort into it, one of the last to submit assignments; you get the idea. It seemed like I was never going to like writing and going to give up. However, I took a class that was writing, but it was different; it made me examine my inner child. Who I am as a person. It was then I realized the only obstacle stopping me from writing was myself. Once I started putting in the effort and applying my skills, I realized I loved writing.

It's the same for drawing. Life can be time-consuming, but there isn't a time when anyone can make time to do what they love or something new. If they can't, then they need to relook at their priorities and relax a bit. Also, with the time it takes to get good at drawing, celebrate what you can do and improve on your mistakes later. Look at Kenzcoolz, she's having fun drawing Sonic and other characters and creating art to share. She's a great artist because she's doing what she loves. Over time, I know she'll get better because she keeps trying. AI takes that feeling away of self-improvement and self-discovery. It's interesting what AI can do, but if you're using it for that purpose to say you won't be good at art, you've given up. You said it yourself, you saw improvements in your drawings, shouldn't you be encouraging others who need that boost of confidence?

I'm not going to leave a verdict on the AI Art ban. As BurgerGuy said, it's here to stay, and it's not worth turning the site into a battleground. However, if you're an artist on this wiki, we should be encouraging users who have an interest in drawing to put their ideas on paper instead of relying on AI. The statement, "Not everyone has the talent to draw." isn't true. Everyone can draw. Yes, some people have fractured bones or have a disability that puts a hindrance into drawing. Despite that, they still find a way to express themselves on paper. Only the first step is the hardest, keep practicing and you'll learn something new about yourself and your skills.

I understand your point, Splash, but in my opinion, Vernyou wins.

Whether you like it or not, some people just don't have the time to do the things they want. Again, as I may reiterate: art is art. I don't care if it's made by AI. How would you feel if only art made by top artists would be classified as art? Would that make you feel upset? users like @INTEGILLENT GUY can express their creativity with AI art. Some people have a disability and can't use their hands, so AI art can help them with that.

I'm sorry, though you make good points, Splash, my vote is still to Oppose.

@Nathanthehazingdaze007 That's not true. If you believe that, then you've quit. I stand by what I've said. Take this statement from Mark Crilley, someone who help me at the beginning of my drawing phase:

"If comparing your art to other people is bringing you down, stop doing it. Your work doesn't need to win contests, impress people, or be 'conventionally beautiful'."

The Levels in Drawings is an outdated concept to me. I struggled with fitting multiple characters on a page, and with advice from WyvernSilver and believing in myself that I'd get better, I started improving. Even someone with a disability can still draw. I was reading this Reddit thread. One user mentioned her friend's colorblind. Despite that, she developed her own bright and unique art style.

AI Art is art, but it lacks one crucial element that sets it apart from traditional art: feelings. People who use mobians.ai or Sonic Diffusion are missing out on the fun of drawing and self-accomplishment. They're innovative tools, but it's not the same as getting out a blank canvas and sketching your ideas. Many users who do use AI have creative ideas, but it would be more appealing and satisfying if they draw it themselves. AI can't replicate that personal touch.

I'd say I oppose, even if I have been here for a week at most do my vote probably has no relevance. From what I've seen, AI Art is just made for fun in the wiki, and actual artists who post their own art tend to get many more upvotes or whatever, so it's not like it's threatening artists in the Wikia anyway

You could make the argument for other parts of the internet being affected, but honestly that shouldn't be our issue, we're just a little niche of the internet that's not even affected by AI Art

@SplashFactor I don't think anyone's arguing that it doesn't have the personal touch of non-AI art. But that's simply not a good enough reason to ban it entirely, which was the original suggestion. The implication there is that it isn't as good, which is true. But where does that leave bad artists? Should they be banned too? Why's having AI art and criticising it worse than not having it at all?

@FH2104 I didn't vote because I know there are users here who do appreciate AI Art and what it can do. However, this statement made by Flash-Gold-Echo bugged me a bit.

"It is the future, whether you like it or not. Humans will not need to apply for artist jobs and it will become just a hobby, whereas everyone else will use AI art. Also, it's fun to use and is already better than every human." 

I won't lie; this statement right here is wrong. Look at Tyson Hesse, Adam Bryce Thomas, Evan Stanley, and many of the artists that do Sonic-related media. AI, while a helpful tool, can't replicate the hard work these or anyone puts into their work. It is part of the future, and it's interesting, but it shouldn't take over people's livelihoods. I said what I need to say above, but this comment here isn't cool. Also, there's no such thing as a bad artist. People who say that need to open their eyes and see what they can do. Everyone can draw and has their unique style. Keep improving and practicing, and you'll see results.

I'm not sure about the Discord Server because it's its own thing. But in regard to Discussions, I think using it simply for fun, as other people stated above, is fine. Not all people have a talent for art (I as an example, do not have), some may have some kind of disability, etc. So, as long as the one creating the art is attributed, it should be fine to be posted on Discussions.

@SplashFactor Yeah, I am aware that AI cannot replace the personal touch of someone's creativity, but that doesn't mean AI can't be useful in helping people. Yes, people can draw, but some choose not to. We are the ones who write down the ideas on how to use AI art. We are the ones who still use endless amounts of creativity. And again, you aren't understanding this: not everyone can draw due to things like mental or physical disabilities. I am typing an idea for something, and I am still using my creativity to make something. I don't need a piece of paper and a pencil to create something with emotion. I can create emotion with clay, writing, or filmography. Sure, it might NOT be made with the personal touch of me drawing, but that's not a reason to ban AI art. I am tired of people saying, 'Oh, now technology is going to replace all creativity,' when no, it's just a new way to express it. I don't know if I can explain it to you better, but my answer is still no to AI being banned.