Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20160829051027/@comment-679780-20160829184337

BlueSpeeder wrote: Mystic Monkey wrote: I don't know how I should feel about this. I need to think on it. I would like the whole community get to have a say in major matters than just decided on admins.

But at the same time the community doesn't tend to offer the right feedback when we're open with such matters. If you are not up to, you don't necessarily have to take up the role. What Kyle is suggesting that a group of bureaucrats, namely Ultra, you, and I, should make the wiki decisions. What makes us three special is that we're are among the only administrators actually active on the wiki and we can be trusted. Again, we can find someone else to fit you position if you are not up to it, but please take that into consideration.

Like a council of sorts? I guess I can take up a seat if it's decided. But I will remain neutral for now than support or oppose until I get a better understanding of this system.