Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20160908202646/@comment-25061880-20160909060346

Bullet Francisco wrote: As Sacor said, I would have liked to see this system function for at least a month with necessary adjustments being made (it was made pretty clear in the conclusion that the community would still have input), but seeing as the three of you apparently could not even handle the thought of the council role for more than a day (you guys didn't even really make any decisions), I don't see the council system working out well. In theory it would have worked nicely, but I suppose it just didn't pan out. I agree, it seems like the three of you aren't quite happy with the thought of having so much power.

I think it is important, that the users have at least something to say regarding SNN, but I also think you do not need to put everything to vote. For example, when you want to change the structure of the articles, it might be wise to let the users vote since they have to cope with it later. However, other things like user rights do not have to be voted for in my opinion. I think we can trust the ones in charge to choose the right people for those positions. And if it turns out to be a bad idea, you can still revert it.

What is most important is that you are okay with the situation. Unhappy bureaucrats lead to unhappy users.