Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-1392727-20140328161637/@comment-2054358-20140329153312

Yeah, the matter of disrespect was an obvious misunderstanding, but Bullet Francisco still counted it against me when he blocked me. That comment about "Nintendo haters," I shouldn't have said because it made people think I was accusing the people on the deletion side, and there were some Nintendo fans who voted to delete. Their main reason for voting was that they agreed with what Bullet said. And you're right, we shouldn't dwell on the past, but I was wondering how this rule should change things if it ever happens to me again. The two weeks without editing was not fun, especially when I had a poll to run. In fact, the votes to whether keep or delete would have been for one week instead of two if I wasn't blocked. Well, the votes were tied at the Friday I intended to end it, but BiggertheCat broke the tie with keep. If I wasn't blocked and closed the poll on time, the Super Smash Bros. characters wouldn't have been restricted to my userspace. I don't want to get blocked during the revote. I would want to know if this new blocking policy would lesson the chances of a block in the future. When you're in charge of a poll, it's the worst time to get blocked. Considering the fact that the guy who blocked me was the same guy who really wanted the Smash articles gone, and my strike three was a misunderstanding, I got a little suspicious about the block. But don't take this personally, Bullet if you think I deserved it whether or not if you were on my side at the time, I forgive you. Are you still active? I haven't seen you in a while. Well, I have dwelled in the past too long. This forum is mainly about vandalism, Project Smash Bros. is doing good so far. I still wonder what will happen if I accidentally repeat this in the revote.