Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20140409023013/@comment-2054358-20140409200805

Yeah, Toad should be deleted. Just having him here as the only Nintendo character that was never playable with Sonic is not very good for my Smash Bros. project. I liked the playable requirement because it helps with determining who gets a page and who doesn't. In fact my Smash Bros. project is based on that playable rule. You won't find assist trophies like Starfy in my userspace. Toad almost justifies a lot of Nintendo pages such as Big Bullet Bill, Starfy, Little Mac (while Little Mac is playable now, he was only playable once), Lakitu, Boo, King Boo, Devil, Nintendog, a lot of characters. So much that we would be a Nintendo wiki. Now where is that funny picture of Link? Oh, here it is: If anyone is offended by the image, I'm sorry. It's not to attack any users. I'm just making a joke about how I feel about Toad's page. I don't care how big Toad's role is in the handhelds. He's still not playable. However, Mega Man is a completely different story. Since he's a main character in a comic crossover, I don't think it is that fair to leave him out. Other media is different from video games. You don't play as Spider-Man in a Spider-Man comic. You read about him. The Capcom characters can stay as they are other media. So here is what I'd count for appearances.

Playable characters: Yep, that rule was there from the beginning.

Characters in Other Media: Yep, how can we leave Mega Man out?

Non-Playable game characters:NO! I need to lesson the explosion of Nintendo characters when my revote comes. Toad, you got to go. I don't care if you have a "big" part in the DS version or if it's bigger than Cream, but as long as your around, I fear we might have more Nintendo characters than Sonic characters, and that's bad for a Sonic wiki. At least the Smash characters can still be a minority to Sonic, right?