Board Thread:User Rights Requests/@comment-477304-20170417190140/@comment-4533965-20170417204341

Myself 123 wrote: I never said I wasn't grateful for what Journalistic has done in the past, but it's a logical fallacy to think that makes infallible now. None of this justifies his current actions, nor does it excuse them.

The fact that he had to be talked to once is cause for concern enough and if two administrators felt they needed to talk about his action, then even more so.

I could do wothout the condescension, but fair enough, I present Journalistic's contributions: Special: Contributions/Journalistic. Here, you can see when Journalistic has closed down threads and unprofessionally responded to legitimate questions presented to him. Because of his current actions, sending him a message seemed pointless as I would expect him to respond as he usually does. Yeah, two administrators that actually want to take action on the case. I've had to discuss this issue with Journalistic too because no one else bothered to do so. Thankfully, Ultra has made amends and understands the situation now, so he is not at fault here.

Again, I apologize for the condescension, but sometimes, it's necessary to let you know that you definitely did not take the right steps at making this demotion. Thank you for posting his contributions to these claims instead of specific instances, especially for the fiftieth or so message to be in this thread.

It's also ironic how everyone but you wants this embarrassment of a thread closed. I think it speaks volumes on how faulty our politics on this wiki work.

Journalistic, do me a favor and close this thread like how people were overreacting about you closing threads earlier for me pleaee.