Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20160829051027/@comment-477304-20160904182158

BlueSpeeder wrote: Myself 123 wrote: Really? Ww're actually going through with this? It doesn't appear that any of my points have been countered, can anyone tell me why reducing the participants needed for censensus wouldn't work? Then again, maybe this is a sign of things to come. It appears that way, you are, like, the only one disagreeing with the "bureaucrat team with limited community input" idea. Actually, I recall seeing a couple of other users share my sentiments, so I'm not the only one.