Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-1272757-20131112003859/@comment-25685240-20131115035859

SeanWheeler wrote: While I may not have been an admin and never had any authority here, I think admins should only be demoted if they did something bad, like vandalize articles or delete pages that weren't supposed to be deleted. Inactivity of one user wouldn't be bad unless everyone else was inactive. And demotion for inactivity is similar to the rule about deleting user pages for inactivity. Thankfully that rule was abolished because if it wasn't, I would be worrying about my Super Smash Bros. pages getting deleted when I'm inactive for too long. People have reasons for being inactive, like school, work, family, and even focus on other websites. People have their own lives and priorities. If the inactivity rules were even stricter, people might even get blocked for not editing, and if it was like that, everyone could get blocked for simply leaving. Well at least there is no rule about blocking for inactivity, right? Well, anyway, I agree more with Kag. You act like it's a punishment even though they can return and request their rights back.