Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-20015702-20140405191815/@comment-20015702-20140406134751

Slug-Drones wrote: Reasoning with the users participating in an heated argument is alright I guess but it should last a few seconds. I don't want to keep telling the users to calm down for more than 2 times. Heated arguments are already against the rules because in that, the users aren't civil with each other. If you break the rules, you get a ban. You break the rules a second time, you get a longer ban. Simple.

Admins aren't supposed to make sure users like each one another. They should keep their grudge to themselves if they have any. We shouldn't be responsible if A still hates B. But if A expresses their hatred toward B here in public, I don't see why an admin shouldn't ban A. We can't ensure A will end up liking B. That's not our job.

Lastly, if you have evidence that an admin handled an argument poorly, please show it to us. Firsty, I'm really sorry for causing this huge confusion

Secondly, My point is almost opposite to yours, Drones. A few seconds is an ample amount of time to deal wth a situation. My target are users who don't break the rules, but end up in issues against other users, misunderstatements etc. An admin shouldnt keep saying "Calm down" either; that is what Im speaking against. An admin should take time, connect with the users problem and deal with the issue. This was never about breaking rules.

And the main quarells that take place are between a User and an Admin, not two users, having an admin to deal with them. I think you have interpreted my words wrong, I'm dearly sorry.

Sadly, I have no visual evidence and I'd like to refrain from calling out names.