Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-1392727-20140328161637/@comment-2054358-20140329140627

And what about unintentional harrassment? Back in October, I was blocked for three words: "Prosecuter," "Nintendo haters," and "disrespectful". "Prosecuter" was when I used a court metaphor about the issue of the Super Smash Bros. characters on the original voting. I did not realize people were so sensitive to lawyers. "Disrespectful" was a misunderstanding. Shadowunleashed's talk page was in my watchlist, and I noticed Gomez commenting and it looked like Shadow wasn't responding, so I told her that Shadow might not care if he's not responding, but she removed my comment. I undid her revert, stating it's disrespectful to remove people's comments. But it turned out that Shadow was responding on Gomez's talk page the whole time. I was used to discussions staying on one page. It's very confusing if user talk pages went back and forth, in fact it was discouraged on certain wikis. "Nintendo haters" was pretty much just a bad joke. When Supermorff suggested that someone who doesn't like the current rule should change it, it really caused me to react with that word. Well, at least none of those words were actual swear words. "Nintendo haters" was the only word I regret saying. Bullet warned me about saying stuff about "prosecuters" so I should have been more careful. I was completely surprised when I was blocked for two weeks. If that rule was in place, how would my block have be done differently?