Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20160829051027/@comment-477304-20160829194552

BlueSpeeder wrote: Myself 123 wrote: Remove community consensus!? Definitely not! That's absurd. For the sake of clarification, might elaborating on why you disagree? It would help us out a ton if we knew why people disagree with this idea. :) Well as I said, it's absurd, a wiki should be driven by the community, not by a select few. Do you not see an issue with only a small group having all authority on the wiki? No offence to the proposed three, but what if their decisions do not reflect what is best for everyone? Regular users who have issues with the current state of things would no longer have a say, which would be incredibly discouraging. Who would join this wiki if they have no ability to voice improvements? This is a terrible solution to the problem and I doubt the wiki will continue is spite of it; we already get users who are afraid of those with additional rights, what's it gonna be like if they're actually above the other users?

If the issue is that the community is too small, wouldn't the simplest solution be to reduce the amount of users needed to participate in important matters?