Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20150927011839/@comment-1392727-20151002072900

BlueSpeeder wrote: Dr. Livsi wrote: Words like 'sexy' and 'damn' don't need a warning so thought out. The contents of this wiki are not extreme enough for a warning, and even if this template was made, it would be for about 4 or 2 pages. To add, the we are not babysiters argument is still valid. Slug-Drones wrote: I think the template is misleading if the article will just have only one or two uses of words like 'damn'. It looks like its generalizing that the overall content of the page is inappropriate. I don't think it's necessary. Let me make it clear (since apparently nothing is ever clear enough) that the template is not just for articles with only swearing. It's also for articles with inappropriate contents (Sonic OVA, for example). Therefore, that 2-4 page count would be increased to maybe a good ten pages.

The Sonic OVA page is a good example. Your point is valid.

BlueSpeeder wrote: If you highly, highly doubt there's enough articles to warrant such template, then I'll find all of the articles that has inappropriate content and list them down all to you just to prove my point.

Yes, that would be helpful.