Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20160908202646/@comment-1272757-20160909034227

Bullet Francisco wrote: As Sacor said, I would have liked to see this system function for at least a month with necessary adjustments being made (it was made pretty clear in the conclusion that the community would still have input), but seeing as the three of you apparently could not even handle the thought of the council role for more than a day (you guys didn't even really make any decisions), I don't see the council system working out well. In theory it would have worked nicely, but I suppose it just didn't pan out.

At this point I'll go with whatever suggestion works best for streamlining decision making. I don't feel like every single decision needs to go through the community, as I feel like most of the decisions being made nowadays are pretty obvious ones as the wiki infrastructure is already set in stone.

Use your discretion as admins is what I am saying. If something is clearly for the betterment of the wiki, then do it. If it's a big change that might be objectionable, get some opinions from the community. Seriously, don't feel limited by the community or the need to gather mass consensus for relatively small things. If something is objectionable, someone will object to it. If you're unsure, grab a second opinion before you do something. Not everything needs to be made into a site discussion. Just remember to use your discretion.

^This is a valid course of action too.