Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20140908212058/@comment-11379689-20140909153819

BlueSpeeder wrote:

Pandoo wrote: Nothing here can stop the Blue-Bulldozer, I say nothing.

That said, the following may not matter:

It looks like you want to change the rules just so your buddy gets his rights, as respectable and modest as it seems, it's equally silly and biased. Yet to see it, a nomination with 10+ oppositions should still be taken into consideration in the fact they came with large reasons and the supports were ... well not.

I don't know why you want this so bad, because I still think Metal needs to prove. Only thing that changed ever since is time, so I still have to see work from Metal outside the chat, even though he did do so, during his nomination, he quickly gave up and still seems to be just a great chat mod to me, no more. LOL You're funny!

Just because there's 10+ oppose comments does not mean it automatically knocks down the higher, support percentage. Also, I'm changing the rules because they seem unfair, not because Metal didn't become an administrator. Oooooh no. 70% as the percentage is too high honestly.

And I should set up a voting section here to find if Metal should obtain these rights or if he should work a little more. How about that? The fact that you're being sarcastic and serious at the same time is getting me confused. Come again.