Thread:Ultrasonic9000/@comment-26409147-20150902190146/@comment-4533965-20150924124212

Dr. Livsi wrote: ''' BlueSpeeder wrote: We make articles for existing characters, items, groups, etc. Hello Doggy, while it was only seen for maybe five seconds, still can get an article. Maybe people are legitimately wondering what that is and such. I've talked to others about merging minor stuff with episode articles and it honestly just doesn't work. ''' I don't who you've spoken to, but I guess unanimously, no one gets the point of a quality wiki page. Giving the Awardy Award it's own section of "recepients", like somebody actually cares, seems high quality to you guys. If redundancy sounds like quality to you, That is something I can't relate to, so I have no counter argument. I've only spoken to one user about this, the only opinion I trust, and they had agreed.

BlueSpeeder wrote: Funny who you're telling this to probably our best and most active editor. Don't take this on a personal level, Blue, it happens far too much when I'm just trying discuss problems on this wiki

My concerns are the articles, not the guy making it. I don't care if he's the best. If he's made a mistake and I feel like he should be told this, I should tell him myself, it's advice, not an attack.

BlueSpeeder wrote: Why don't you try writing an article and see how hard it is? Again, this is for a cause. You telling me to try it for myself points as if I'm just here to mess around. If I didn't know how to write a proper article, I would not have brought this up. I believe I know editing, and that's the reason why I'm discussing this. I don't need to take your challenge. Alright then. I still don't like the idea of merging minor stuff in an episode article since I wouldn't know how to do it without seeming too forced. But I get your point.

Slug-Drones wrote: @Bluespeeder and Ultra - I don't think articles like Hello Doggy meet the standards of a good encyclopedia article. It's not organized to create a new article for the most insignificant things. Smaller topics are not purposely stretched just to look big enough for it's own page, instead they are organized under larger articles. It takes more effort, but I think the end result is more efficient. Think of it as a book. Your preference here is quantity over quality. But what you get is a cluttered mess of unrelated things (like Hello Doggy and Awardy Awards) mashed together in one article that seems off to me (that's probably just my organized attitude standing in the way, though). If you want it, then fine, we'll do it.