Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20160908202646/@comment-25061880-20160909071634

Kagimizu wrote: Admins and 'crats are not perfect, and can lend themselves to favoritism or bad decisions. If they promoted the wrong person, then it's the wiki and its community that suffers for it. I know, they might not be perfect, but I think it is very unlikely that three bureaucrats are favouring someone. And if that is the case, then there must be a reason why they are doing so, maybe because he or she is an active and dedicated user and deserves the rights. I also think that we can trust Sacor, Ultra and Blue not doing a bad decision. And even if the community thinks one user doesn't deserve the rights, they are able to object.

I think the current situation with the fifteen votes is not fitting. To get those fifteen votes needs a lot of time and some supporters might only support out of friendship. The admins/bureaucrats however know exactly that they have a huge responsibility and like I said, I think we can trust them. But I also want to repeat, the three of them have to be comfortable in the situation.