Board Thread:User Rights Requests/@comment-477304-20170417190140/@comment-4220590-20170418110310

Luma.dash wrote: BlueSpeeder wrote: Y'all are unbearable.

Journalistic has already stated the works that he has done on the wiki, and I personally agree wholeheartedly on his sentiment. Without him, the SNN Twitter account would be dead. Without him, sysop users wouldn't have bold names (that was a problem that, oh wait, no other administrator thought to fix?! Wow! That's astonishing!). Without him, we would have a filthy wiki full of pointless and childish threads. Consider yourselves very lucky to have an administrator like Journalistic and you better hope he doesn't consider leaving because of all of you guy's ramblings and complaints. Y'all should be ashamed of yourselves.

Also, let's make something very, very clear. Journalistic has only been contacted about this issue very few times. The first time anyone had an issue with him was in a thread about "my monobook skin, oh my gawd" as seen here. Let's also not forget that both Ultra and Luma.dash were caught gossiping about Journalistic's "intolerable actions." Two administrators, talking crap about another administrator, in the main chatroom and not in a private discussion.

Also, Myself, let's make something clear with you as well. You have provided literally no references, no proof, no sources to backup your claims that Journalistic has been closing threads, that drops your letter grade to a B. Also, you failed to contact Journalistic about this, when I'm quite sure he could have easily answered your concerns, instead of, oh I don't know, making a demotion thread without even alarming him. Without even messaging him about it. Your letter grade is an F now, congratulations. Try next time. Pardon me if I am too late to respond to your comment, but are you directing the problem at me? I'm the one who has started the problem or I am the only one who is complaining?

You may not believe me, but these problems didn't come from nothing and some of these affected me because I was directly speaking to him and he dismisses, like the design of infoboxes and the wiki. You can also see that it also frequently happens when he enables the europa feature and Ultra disables it, as we have not chosen the feature and we chose to design the infoboxes ourselves, he should not do that. He also disabled the Chat feature on 1st April joke when we said earlier we should not.

So, when it came to me to contact another admin for such a thing. I ask if I am the only one who is noticing that, and if I am wrong so he can correct me. Also, what would it help me to say "craps" like you said? The answer is it does NOTHING. When Ultra left the subject in hand uncommented during that day, I chose to pass on it since he assumed good faith and so did I, or I was going to demand strong reasons from him to why he is acting like that.

I for one, assumed (of good faith) that since he is your friend, you would go on with reasoning his actions and I respected it. However, you are seeing it from one side to the point of thinking that I am enjoying the behavior you said, even there is nothing to back that up since I have not mistreated anybody here before. You don't know me much to say what you just said. You are not assuming good faith here. Luma.dash, please. Let's just leave this for now. This thread should not be about such arguments, nor should it be about accusations. We should give this a rest for now.