Thread:Ultrasonic9000/@comment-26409147-20150902190146/@comment-26409147-20150924091543

''' BlueSpeeder wrote: We make articles for existing characters, items, groups, etc. Hello Doggy, while it was only seen for maybe five seconds, still can get an article. Maybe people are legitimately wondering what that is and such. I've talked to others about merging minor stuff with episode articles and it honestly just doesn't work. ''' I don't who you've spoken to, but I guess unanimously, no one gets the point of a quality wiki page. Giving the Awardy Award it's own section of "recepients", like somebody actually cares, seems high quality to you guys. If redundancy sounds like quality to you, That is something I can't relate to, so I have no counter argument. I've only spoken to one user about this, the only opinion I trust, and they had agreed.

BlueSpeeder wrote: Funny who you're telling this to probably our best and most active editor. Don't take this on a personal level, Blue, it happens far too much when I'm just trying discuss problems on this wiki

My concerns are the articles, not the guy making it. I don't care if he's the best. If he's made a mistake and I feel like he should be told this, I should tell him myself, it's advice, not an attack.

BlueSpeeder wrote: Why don't you try writing an article and see how hard it is? Again, this is for a cause. You telling me to try it for myself points as if I'm just here to mess around. If I didn't know how to write a proper article, I would not have brought this up. I believe I know editing, and that's the reason why I'm discussing this. I don't need to take your challenge.