Thread:Pandoo/@comment-3416945-20150101030647/@comment-3416945-20150102084442

Slug-Drones wrote: Bullet Francisco wrote: In private message on the Sonic News Network, please note that in the chat policy it says some rules may be ignored, excluding the primary ones and that all users must be comfortable with it. No personal attacks is a primary rule, and if you are caught breaking that rule, even in private message, you are able to be subject to a ban. Please review the chat rules for more information.

If you're referring to him back-talking other users to a user they trust, it shouldn't warrant a ban. You're reducing his right to express an opinion.

If you're referring to harassing a user on their PM, it warrants a ban. However, evidence is needed.

I provided evidence in the chat log link above, Slug-Drones. If you had taken the time to actually read my message, you would have noticed that.

And taking his previous ban and chat bans into account, all of which remain valid, as well as looking over his contributions ever since he joined the wiki, I have concluded that his behavior has been intolerable. Aside from the reports I have received about Pandoo and what I have witnessed myself in the chatroom, I will provide to you the following:


 * Chat log for which he was banned, please be aware that there is some questionable language - The chat rules are very specific in regards to what is and what isn't allowed there. The private messaging system still occurs on the wiki, but because of the more intimate nature of private messaging, we have allowed them to be more loose. The official chat policy is as follows:
 * Private messages are messages between two or more users on chat which cannot be viewed publicly by other users present on chat. As such, some or all of the chat policies, excluding the primary rules can be ignored whilst in private message provided all users involved are comfortable with it.
 * Please note that it says EXCLUDING THE PRIMARY RULES. He clearly broke the no personal attacks rule, which is clearly in big bold letters under "Primary Rules" on the chat policy page.
 * Moving on, Pandoo's objectionable behavior has occurred for nearly a year on end without proper punishment. I will now provide to you several instances in which Pandoo has displayed poor behavior:
 * Personal attack on Pacmansonic138.
 * Personal attack on Pacmansonic138 continued.
 * This blog in general.
 * And even from the very first edit he made on the wiki, he was breaking the rules.
 * As I said, I took his previous ban on the wiki and previous chat bans into consideration. For easy access to his chat ban log, see here.

In conclusion, after witnessing the user's poor behavior on the chatroom, I took a look at his contributions, previous ban, and previous chat bans, only to find that Pandoo has been displaying this type of behavior ever since joining the wiki. He has lacked proper disciplinary action until now, and taking his previous bans and chat bans into consideration, I determined that a one month ban was a suitable length with other wiki administrators who had witnessed his poor behavior on chat as well.

Oh, I can still provide more if you're interested.