Sonic News Network:Requests for User Rights/Toxice (Rollback)

{{Closed|{{Member|Toxice}} was promoted to rollback on 16 June 2014.|archive=

Toxice (Rollback) Toxice (talk): Contributions Edit Count Today, I'm carrying out my very first nomination, under my approval, for the rollback status. Through time, I myself think I have done the wiki's editing good, sticking to the policy and editing frequently, which involves template implementation, edit policy works, cooperating with other editors and reverting vandalism, following a warning note. In the end, I believe I can benefit from a promotion as well. --{{User:Toxice/Sig}} 16:00, June 9, 2014 (UTC)

Support
VOTING IS NOW CLOSED
 * 1) A great editor who deserves this, if I may say.
 * 2) I support, even though I deserve it more --Butterdance (talk) 16:07, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) She'll do good.--SlugDrones • (Contact) 16:19, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Sure, why not?
 * 5) I've seen you undo vandalism and talk to users afterwards about the matter. I think you'll benefit from rollback rights.  Myself  123  16:22, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) She's reeeaal good when it comes to vandalism. --Krazy Company (talk) 16:27, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) Support BlueFlametheAman Emperor of Chaos ( talk ) 16:32, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 8) Can't think of a reason not to give Toxice rollback rights. Edits frequently, aware of how to use it, could really benefit from rollback. -- Murphyshane -  熱! Don't click here   16:35, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 9)  17:15, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 10) Toxice sets the perfect example for helping users in editing. --MeanieToes (talk) 20:18, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 11) No better candidate. -- 21:01, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 12) --IceSeason101 (talk) 21:41, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 13) Towards my persepctive, I do see a better view on how you can help prevent vandalism and also telling them about it and why the user should not do vandalism. But in this moment, I feel you should be a prefect fit to become a Rollback. 9:43 PM, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * 14) Mystic Orb (TP.CO.EC) 06:23, June 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * 20:42, June 16, 2014 (UTC)

Oppose
VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Discussion

 * I would support, but I need to think this over. Right now, I'm neutral. Sorry. I support now. 21:25, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * No worries. -- 13:04, June 10, 2014 (UTC)


 * Blue stop your s***. Your jealousy is annoying now --Butterdance (talk) 19:05, June 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * Well now, Butter, that came right out of left field. Is there a problem with Blue taking time to consider supporting or opposing? 19:09, June 10, 2014 (UTC)
 * My my, the pot calling the kettle black is indeed true for this situation. Butter, I think it's best if you stop your assumptions since I did not state anything about me being jealous at Toxice. I still am thinking about my vote. So, Butter, if I were you, put away your rudeness meter on me and use it on you; I've seen enough to prove that you easily want me demoted. 18:36, June 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh hey I don't have to vote, oh wait this is a Toxice nomination I'm on the wrong pla*shot* Pacmansonic138 (talk) 18:43, June 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * Pac, a nomination page is no place for joking around. -- Murphyshane -  熱! Don't click here   19:09, June 13, 2014 (UTC)

Conclusion
Yes - Congratulations! Consensus is in favor of your promotion to rollback. This discussion will be removed shortly. 20:42, June 16, 2014 (UTC)

}}