Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-1272757-20131112003859/@comment-3416945-20131122194547

Bullet Francisco wrote: SeanWheeler wrote: And what if that friendly tone doesn't work?

Why wouldn't it work? The odds of that happening are about one in a million. Our administrators are reasonable, why would they still be upset AFTER I explain the situation to them again?

SpyroSonic2000 wrote: Apparently agreeing with what someone says is not a real reason for voting.

...What?

All they need to do is ask for their rights back if they choose to be active again, that's all, and if the message explains anything like it should, it would explain that.

Without the lapsing rule it looked like we were over flowing with admins and we were often criticized for that, and many nominations have been opposed because said reason.

Also, their feelings? Admin and such is to benefit the user and the wiki, them keeping the rights while inactive has them on that list, makes people oppose nominations because "too many admins". The benefits of them keeping the rights? The only thing I can think is inflating their ego.

This.