Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4608608-20150713040900/@comment-1392727-20150713092336

It does not say anything about discussing trolls in their absence. Unless, that is a 'reaction' to you, which is subjective. It can only be assumed. Do you think the policy clearly states your point? Before this, you were quoting an unwritten rule. I don't think there would be a problem if this was written -

Journalistic wrote: '''Mentioning and discussing trolls in chat is not appropriate. Discussion of the troll is not necessary.'''

But you've tried to squeeze out your point out of this.

Journalistic wrote: "Users must not feed the trolls on this wiki. Whenever a user reacts to those who provoke them, they are giving those who provoke them what they want. The more a user reacts, the more the troll will continue what they are doing."

Bullet has quoted a part of the policy page but he changed it to confirm his point. The text in bold is what's not written on the page -

Bullet Francisco wrote: Revert - If any changes were made on the wiki, revert them. Report - Contact an administrator so the user can be dealt with. Nothing - '''Nothing needs to be done beyond this. Discussion of the troll is not necessary. If you want to discuss ban lengths, then do so in private with an administrator.'''

I think we can all agree that this rule is at the very least, not clearly written?