Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20161121224449/@comment-24014422-20161124124523

Bullet Francisco wrote:

Luma.dash wrote:

Bullet Francisco wrote:

Luma.dash wrote: I meant that we entered a lot of unnecessary conflictions. The number of supporting is high as you say, but there are also sounds that do not want to be removed it entirely, like Ultra, me and about two-three more.

At the time Journalistic is just arguing with whoever reasons in the thread, leading to some grim conflictions. Why exactly do you want the featured user interview to remain? From purely a design perspective, it looks stupid on the front page. It's a giant wall of text that most random viewers wouldn't care for. The main page looks much better without it.

Also, Journalistic isn't doing anything objectionable, I don't see why you felt the need to call out him alone. That was unnecessary and is probably going to lead to the conflict you are trying to avoid. As I said above, this is my own personal view. If it is decided that all people want it to be deleted, then I'll go with that. I just find it can be better in another way. And he deems things unnecessary in time we need every help. I am not saying that you cannot have that view, I am asking you WHY you have that view. I wish to understand your perspective, and I kindly ask that you explain it to me.

Gee, you are against "grim and unneeded conflictions", yet go out of your way to start beef with Journalistic? You aren't practicing what you preach, Luma. Calling him out was just as grim and unneeded as everything you had pointed out yourself.


 * From my point, I see it as a good way to know the person and why they are involved on the wiki, besides of course being a way of respect and acknowledgement to the one being interviewed. I just find the idea interesting when I read those interviews.


 * Maybe, because we didn't have a good relation due to the much of conflicts I've encountered with him. But I have no offense, we just have a lot of different points of view.