Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20160829051027/@comment-4533965-20160831034244

I took time to reflect on what's happened here so far so I can cool down and concentrate what is happening. The thing that seems to be the most popular choice at the time of this comment is that the bureaucrats will have power to run the wiki with minor community participation for the time that our community is small. However, once it grows back to a more-than-decent size, it will revert back to its community-decides policy. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's essentially what I got out of most of this thread.

Then, there's the issue with the administrators chosen to lead the wiki as bureaucrats: it appears I'm the only one that hasn't had second thoughts on leading the wiki, but Ultra and Mystic have been hesistant. If you two do not want to do it, then we will find replacements. Bullet chose the three because we were the administrators that were actually active before this thread was created. However, it appears to me that some administrators and even bureaucrats that were inactive have returned due to this thread. I still believe a team of three is the best solution, so there is an uneven vote, but if you are an administrator and are actually willing to be active and care for the wiki that wants to be one of the bureaucrats to help run the wiki (assuming this thread is successful, which appears to be), then by all means, speak up now.

And as for the voting, I'm going to hold that off for now. I need to make sure if I got all the details right on the first paragraph in this response.