Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20141229233245/@comment-4533965-20150112023707

SonicTheHedgehogDude wrote: BlueSpeeder wrote:

Bullet Francisco wrote:

BlueSpeeder wrote: Don't speak for me like you're my parent. I can make my own calls. This sounds pretty hypocritical when you're the one calling administrators dictators and when you said you would drop the argument. Just throwing that out there. Let's keep the rude remarks to a minimum. There are nicer ways you could have said that (be nice is SNN policy).

As Silver said, you really are making a bigger deal out of this than it really is. It's already been determined that administrators cannot do anything major without consensus. We do not need to have a separate vote for one incident. Didn't require a comment saying I'm a hypocrite from someone who has acted worst, but that's irrelevant. Now, are we voting or not? '''We're voting for something that is already in place? '''What's the point? "we need to have community consensus for anything major that an administrator and/or bureaucrat is performing" has already been a thing for years. The only thing we need to do it to clarify what an admin can or can't do, and that's all. Then let's do it already since it's such a big damn deal to only two or three users.