Thread:RayyvvinnSkye/@comment-3416945-20150129220812/@comment-26567650-20150130021502

BlueSpeeder wrote: Bullet Francisco wrote:

BlueSpeeder wrote:

Bullet Francisco wrote:

BlueSpeeder wrote:

Bullet Francisco wrote: It does not matter if he was joking. I could say "Bullet Francisco you are a terrible admin you suck you are a bad editor and do nothing jk haha" and it would still be an insult. Just because it is a joke does not mean it is a joke made in poor taste. A joke still has meaning, sarcasm can still be offensive. You cannot excuse something just because it was a joke.

You guys were not even there when the situation unfolded. I asked Glitchguy to remove the swearing on his profile, he refused, saying that there existed no such swear rule, I informed him about the change in case he didn't know, and then he got upset. He decided to mock me and the other admin that warned him to change the swearing by editing it to "Bullet is a scrub". That's most certainly an insult, regardless of context or jokes.

He's had a problem with sarcasm for awhile now. It doesn't matter if you're joking. That doesn't excuse the behavior and mockery of the administrators. If you're clearly breaking the rules, then you don't respond with bad jokes insulting the admins. You disregard warnings, you get banned. Plain and simple.

You guys weren't even there, so how are you able to call it a "simple" situation? Lol. Just because I wasn't present for the incident does not mean I can't discuss about it and let you possibly block him out of bias. Yes, his sarcasm has been an issue, and I'll give you that. However, he replaced the content with "Bullet is a scrub". I don't know about you, but that's rather ambigous in terms of tone; I can take it in both ways, honestly. Like I said, you're overreacting. '''Why are you assuming I blocked him out of bias? Don't assume bad faith here.''' It doesn't matter if it was a joke or not, like I said. He mocked me after arguing with me over a blatant rule violation by changing it to that. Everyone here is in consensus that he deserved punishment, which he did, so how is it out of bias exactly? Just because it could have been a joke doesn't mean anything. I would call you out and say you're a hypocrite for what you said in the sentence that's in bold, but still, removing his rights is a little extreme. I understand that he could have been serious, but calling someone a scrub and subsequently getting blocked is baffling. lol ok this entire message is hilarious How mature for an admin.

Anyway, are you going to reply back like a mature administrator, or am I going to have to unblock Glitch because he was blocked out of bias? Where did the bias card come from? 4 admins were in agreement.

Anyways, I was involved in this and made the call for a 2 week ban, part of which just this afternoon he was warned twice (along with two other users) about making accusations about Punk to a new user, during the fact we don't have sufficient proof to say so.