Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20141229233245/@comment-26567650-20150111233408

BlueSpeeder wrote:

SilverPlays97 wrote:

BlueSpeeder wrote: SilverPlays97 wrote: BlueSpeeder wrote: Read above. Community consensus approved that administrators can't alter the chat policy to their will. Community consensus is final. Where does it say this? From what I read, we just agreed we will add my suggested section on admin actions. Sure there was allot of talk about what community consensus is, but that was just talk and never suggested a rule change.

Didn't somone say 'admins can not do major actions without community consensus' was already a thing? I'm pretty sure that community consensus agreed that admins can't be dictators, so I'm sure that means altering the chat rules to a HUGE effect is among the banned rules. OK back up, dictator is a big acusation and is by no means a word to be used lightly. Why are you focausing so much on the chat rules? You said in your OP "we need to have community consensus for anything major that an administrator and/or bureaucrat is performing". As stated above, that already a rule. It's just been ignored recently.

I think you are making a bigger deal out of this than what it really is. Yeah, I probably am, but it's just people are too stubborn to let things move on and deal with community consensus. I'm dropping the argument now. Anymore suggestions before I close this thread? Already made my suggestion. Might wanna read it. Nevertheless, final comment can go like this:

Under community consensus, the following chat rules are to be abolished: censoring the entire swear word, adding a description for links unless having language or provocative nature within the link, allowing the mentioning and soft-conversations of drugs, sex, religion, and politics.