Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20140813192809/@comment-167456-20140816220310

Okay, Mr. Technical. Just throwing out an example, so no need to correct me on everything I do wrong. By the way, you're off; those separate banner templates are gone, so no need to complain about them. Ah good. My mistake for not checking that.

Also, how would people be confused with the "Sonic the Hedgehog (Archie)" article being the, oh I don't know, the game article? Clearly the title has "(Archie)" in it, so there is no way one would confuse it with the Sonic Boom or Sonic Underground universe. But not all Archie character pages have an "(Archie)" qualifier. Agreed that banners aren't necessary for pages that do, but in those cases it is for consistency with pages that don't.

Another thing, do you even get what I'm saying? I'm saying that we shouldn't remove the categories; I'm saying we should remove the banners or, at the very least, remove the auto-categories. That's all. Not trying to confuse it. But the banners automatically place the article in a category which can be infuriating when the article is already placed in a subcategory of the category added by the banner. Yes, I understood perfectly what you were saying. My response was exactly on that basis.