Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20160908202646/@comment-27387232-20160908205935

Ultrasonic9000 wrote:

BlueSpeeder wrote:

Kagimizu wrote:

Ultrasonic9000 wrote:

Kagimizu wrote: Now perhaps we can simply consider scaling down the number of votes needed to get things done?

Wanting to streamline the wiki's effectiveness and ability to be maintained and improved is admirable. But like I said, the chosen solution wouldn't fix the source problem; our difficulty bringing new Users in. But finding a solution for that is neither here nor there.

So for now, all we can do is recognize the current state of affairs and adjust accordingly. So what is your verdict on it? Should things be returned to its previous state or not? I'm saying if something currently takes say... 15 votes to get a result, cut it down to maybe 10. Adjust the current system to the situation, rather than trying to completely shake things up. I'm down with this. Anyone else? It is better than the alternative... Would seem like a better move