Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20141229233245/@comment-25165258-20141230015651

SonicTheHedgehogDude wrote: PKMNthehedgehog2.5 wrote: SonicTheHedgehogDude wrote: PKMNthehedgehog2.5 wrote: SonicTheHedgehogDude wrote: PKMNthehedgehog2.5 wrote: SonicTheHedgehogDude wrote: I don't get it. You people are okay with this?

If a link you are posting contains foul language or material in the lines of that, please add in a warning before sharing it.

But not okay with this?

''If you want to share links with the community on chat, give a description about what you are linking to, making sure it accepts all things listed on the policy. ''

...this community... The former makes the latter absolutely pointless, tbh. The latter ruins good jokes, too. Plus if we HAVE the former allowed then we shouldn't have to post links to EVERYTHING. It's annoying, pointless, and an overall hassle Even when linking something with a swear - which I'll see a bunch of users doing that now - you're still typing a somewhat description. It's almost the same rule if you think about it. It is basically, but it's the fact that we shouldn't have to do it when we aren't linking anything bad that we're discussing here, it's, again, too big a hassle for most of us Then linking something with a swear should be "a hassle" too. No, it certainly isn't a hassle, because we only have to do it occasionally and when it's actually necessary. But to do it all the time is a pretty questionable burden That's like saying chatting in a chatroom is a 'burden'. C'mon, it's really that simple. It might be but we'd be so much better off without it. I mean, of course we have to specify inappropriate content and all, but the main rule itself is far too vague to be taken seriously. It's like the other day, Jay had trouble following it, and he posted the literal description for the video. Which, by all means, could actually be taken as a means of following the rule. This is one of the more hated additions to this site and dragging it on is really more trouble than it's worth. Not trying to be rude, but the concensus is against this