Thread:Pandoo/@comment-3416945-20150101030647/@comment-11379689-20150102081103

Slug-Drones wrote:

Bullet Francisco wrote: In private message on the Sonic News Network, please note that in the chat policy it says some rules may be ignored, excluding the primary ones and that all users must be comfortable with it. No personal attacks is a primary rule, and if you are caught breaking that rule, even in private message, you are able to be subject to a ban. Please review the chat rules for more information. If you're referring to him back-talking other users to a user they trust, it shouldn't warrant a ban. You're reducing his right to express an opinion.

If you're referring to harassing a user on their PM, it warrants a ban. However, evidence is needed. That's exactly what I think. I can have the rights to back talk about users who I think are doing a bad job to people I trust. But some "yes-man" takes screencaps and accounts it as a ban, while I have the rights to raise my voice; banning over that is mental torture.

The first time I was banned when I knew what I was doing is when the user arguing with me should have been banned with me, and it was reduced by a lot. A month's too long, think about it.