Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-24014422-20160917140241

Previously in this thread, the three chosen Bureaucrats decided to revert back to community consensus after witnessing a lot of pressure put on them after the triumvirate idea gained community approval. So in the end, they revoked the project. As early as that thread started, we (active users) discussed what should the next level be. Some suggested that there should be a percentage, so if important changes regarding mainspace gained number of supporters more than oppositions or vice versa, the change should either be accepted or declined. Some said that changes should not always be left to discussions, and some said that higher users (like bureaucrats) can make changes on behalf on of others, but the latter group can still disagree, and the input will be given to them. But neither of any of these ideas gained approval. Also, at times the "percentage" idea cannot be put on table, if users are not participating to discuss changes at all.

So in this thread, we must have our final say on our future, and what should be done to coperate with our current state of lacking participants.

My personal thought, is that if no users are saying their words on important subjects on discussions or on chat. The user (whatever his user right is, or if it is non-existence) must ask active admins, moderators about their opinions on the subject and gain their trusts. If neither of the two groups respond, then the idea can roll.

Cast your opinions below on the comments, and PLEASE, be cooperative with other users' opinions and try to make the solution with them. Because, we must end it here and have our projects completed. 