Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20160310200631/@comment-477304-20160312080727

Bullet Francisco wrote: Myself 123 wrote: I feel as though most of the people opposing this are unaware of the glaring problem the chat currently has. We simply do not have enough users to adequately moderate it. Chat is not like the rest of the wiki, it's formless, flowing, ever changing. Anything harmful on chat cannot simply be undone, it requires a lot of surveillance which cannot be met right now.

Honestly, at this point, I don't think it should be up for discussion.

I personally (emphasis on the fact that this is my opinion) feel that you are blowing this supposed "issue" out of proportion because there haven't been any real moderation issues (as in unruly users) and because of this the one to three moderators and administrators that still use the chat suffice. The points in which I (also the points to which users have referenced in their stance) and others have brought up to keep the chat far outweigh the "issue" of little moderation (which I don't feel is a problem at all). We all have our opinions. I fully grasp what you are trying to say and I am saying that I disagree. You can "feel" that people are "unaware" all you like. I'm completely aware and it's not changing my opinion. How do you even know if there's any issues if no one's overseeing the chat? I'm not blowing anything out of proportion, I'm stating the fact that there are great periods of time in which no one is moderarating chat, which is a problem whether you think it is or not.