Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20160310200631/@comment-3416945-20160312053751

Myself 123 wrote: I feel as though most of the people opposing this are unaware of the glaring problem the chat currently has. We simply do not have enough users to adequately moderate it. Chat is not like the rest of the wiki, it's formless, flowing, ever changing. Anything harmful on chat cannot simply be undone, it requires a lot of surveillance which cannot be met right now.

Honestly, at this point, I don't think it should be up for discussion. You've stated this point again and again and I don't feel that there is a moderation issue. Has there been any problems recently with unruly users taking over chat when there aren't any moderators on? No. So why is this supposed lack of moderation (which I personally believe you are making out to be a bigger issue than it actually is) such a problem to the point where it is necessary to take down chat?

This is up for discussion, people are clearly reading through the thread (people are quoting and referencing what other people have said in their stance). Just because people don't agree with your sentiments doesn't mean they are "unaware" of the "glaring problem", which really isn't a problem at all IMO, no matter how much you assert it is you're not changing my mind. I'm completely unconvinced it's a problem at all. There's several reasons the vast majority of people here are overwhelmingly voting to keep chat, and that one "issue" you continue to point out isn't changing my mind.