Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-679780-20161206100340

Those who still use MonoBook to browse SNN may have noticed the first few days I changed the skin to because ever since SNN'10 both MonoBook and Oasis had an overhaul. So last December I made a new MonoBook skin for December. Well this year it was changed by another admin because he said it was all wrong. When I went to ask him about why it was wrong he just closed the discussion without an answer or reason. So I'm starting this thread not to call him out and argue, just want to know what can I do for SNN this December.

There are some things I like about his changes, such as the deeper red boarders. And perhaps having the background skin matching Oasis and MonoBook would be a good idea given it's the same website. However it bothers me this was done after I made the changes without any reason why. Isn't such changes usually discussed with other admins? Plus I find colouring the links red confuses them with dead-links and the page logo in the top-left corner is all distorted.

I just want to know what should be done about it. Granted it's rather low priority since it's only around 2 months a year we decorate and the majority on wikians prefer Oasis. But I have done it like I've always have so I don't see what is wrong with it now. I want to know how SNN, it's community and admins, prefer the MonoBook. Like how I have done it last year or how it is now. 