Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20160829051027/@comment-477304-20160903143835

Luma.dash wrote: Myself 123 wrote:

Luma.dash wrote:

Myself 123 wrote: The issue with considering this as a temporary solution is that there is no certainty that it will remain temporary. For one, the team may change members over time and those members may no longer deem it necessary. The issue with all decisions being made by three individuals is that they have all the power, even if community input is entertained, it would ultimately be their decision, meaning they could go over the community's wishes if they deem it fit.

Also, as this is paradigm shift I cannot stand behind, I do not wish to be a candidate. Actually, nothing can happen without our permission, if a majiority wants to do otherwise. In such case, they can contact Wikia Staff for abusing powers and then they remove the crats rights.

But your point still stands and I've thought about it before. However, we still have trustworthy users such as Bluespeeder and others, so why not give them a chance? We are not country after all. I may have to review Wikia's Terms of Use and rules, but if what you aay is true, then wouldn't that make the proposed change unfeasible or at the very least impractical? I think this is a good example for Wikia laws. But still, what do you mean by it being "impractical"? Because then surely the team would only be able to act on their own when no one's contributed to a discussion or nomination. Which rarely happens, otherwise they'd be going against the community