Board Thread:User Rights Requests/@comment-477304-20170417190140/@comment-4533965-20170418024527

Journalistic wrote: Genesjs wrote: No consensus of any sort has been officially formed. This thread hasn't even been open a day. Or are you just eager to see someone close this thread ASAP before anyone has a chance to address your detractors' criticisms? You have approximately 10 people against you, Luma, and Myself.

I'm not implying it should be closed early, but isn't the above a clear sign of a consensus?

Genesjs wrote: ''Well? Am I wrong?'' Please tell me I'm wrong. Trying to silent Speeder? Don't mind if I do...

Genesjs wrote: I would very much like to believe that you can defend yourself adequately against the criticisms that are being levied at you in this thread, and I would very much'' be interested to see if you or anyone else can give me a good enough reason to change my mind about how I currently perceive you and your recent actions. You're more than welcome to explain it to this out-of-touch fool at any time.'' The majority is already doing a great job explaining a simple point that you two can't get over your head. Might as well catch up on what Hedge said. And with that, I think we're done here. I'm not closing this thread, nor should we, but it's seriously gonna keep going on. Myself, Gen, do yourselves a favor and just stop. Overwhelming majority oppose Journalistic's demotion. You two are the only ones picking a fight over a nonexistent problem. Tell me, getting to point of telling a bureaucrat to shut up and calling a sysop a pompous brat really makes me question who this demotion really should be aimed for: a sysop who makes sure our Twitter account and wiki coding is updated and corrected, or a bureaucrat who's been out of touch and has to resort to ask others what happened instead of being present of the incident involving this nonexistent problem.