Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20161121224449/@comment-24014422-20161123094658

Journalistic wrote: Luma.dash wrote: Instead of tracking each user's edit points to interview someone, make an interview with the one who has done special things on the year, and has added something since his involvement in the wiki chosen by the community through a poll or on the forum.

That's why the section is outdated, because we picked the wrong direction. You've completely missed the point of this thread. There's an issue regarding the monthly updates of the Featured User section, not the topic of the Featured User section. Could you be more specific? How did I miss the point? The thread is discussing the possibility of removing the feature because we're interviewing inactive users. So, does not changing the strategy of the featured user part of it? I didn't mean the questions that are asked.

We can also change the person who is assigned to the job, though I don't think that is the problem itself. The problem is the way we're interviewing persons (based on their edit counts).