Thread:DeCool99/@comment-4702105-20180615004812/@comment-27387232-20180615022401

Okay, my mistake on that bit, but the Amy Flash is still just a gameplay mechanic.

It's not out of date, quit saying that. Official information is official information. Are you saying we can't trust Sega on what they have said about their own characters? It's not like we have gone and said Amy is the weakest character in the series. Far from it.

I will say that if we really wanted to judge Amy based on her fighting skills in modern games (let's say Forces), she's probably only better than Tails. However, at the same time, we can't say Tails is the weaker than Amy because that makes no sense as we do actually see him fight in Adventure, Battle, Heroes, etc. I'd be all for destroying Tails' character development to be sacrificed for Amy's.

But the official information has already stated a fact that we must abide by until Sega finally says "Amy is stronger than these dudes".

We can't rely on gameplay mechanics. Characters can be broken until kingdom come but it won't change anything. Look at Infinite. He has terribly easy boss fights but is still stated to be stronger than Sonic. What do we do? We say he's stronger than Sonic. Otherwise, people who visit the wiki will be very confused as to why the game says he's a threat and we say that he's a cakewalk. Same with Shadow, Eggman, etc. We can't suddenly get out of our seats and preach wildly that "Sonic is 27" instead of 15, because that's not what the official information states.

So no, I'm not finding an example for you, because it has already been stated by the game guide. If you do change the page again, I'll have no choice but to block you.

Good night.