Board Thread:User Rights Requests/@comment-477304-20170417190140/@comment-1669199-20170418005128

Ultrasonic9000 wrote: BlueSpeeder wrote: Y'all are unbearable.

Journalistic has already stated the works that he has done on the wiki, and I personally agree wholeheartedly on his sentiment. Without him, the SNN Twitter account would be dead. Without him, sysop users wouldn't have bold names (that was a problem that, oh wait, no other administrator thought to fix?! Wow! That's astonishing!). Without him, we would have a filthy wiki full of pointless and childish threads. Consider yourselves very lucky to have an administrator like Journalistic and you better hope he doesn't consider leaving because of all of you guy's ramblings and complaints. Y'all should be ashamed of yourselves.

Also, let's make something very, very clear. Journalistic has only been contacted about this issue very few times. The first time anyone had an issue with him was in a thread about "my monobook skin, oh my gawd" as seen here. Let's also not forget that both Ultra and Luma.dash were caught gossiping about Journalistic's "intolerable actions." Two administrators, talking crap about another administrator, in the main chatroom and not in a private discussion.

Also, Myself, let's make something clear with you as well. You have provided literally no references, no proof, no sources to backup your claims that Journalistic has been closing threads, that drops your letter grade to a B. Also, you failed to contact Journalistic about this, when I'm quite sure he could have easily answered your concerns, instead of, oh I don't know, making a demotion thread without even alarming him. Without even messaging him about it. Your letter grade is an F now, congratulations. Try next time. This could have been said with a little more tact, but yes. I admit to have been talking behind Journal's back. It was with no ill intentions, but it was nonetheless done, and it was a disrespectful thing to do. Worse yet, I had the nerve to conduct this talk behind his back and THEN approach him with him problems with him. And I am not the only one. This has brought about a bad relation towards a user who means well and those issues we had about should have been brought before him openly and honestly, which has then led us to this point. Is it really disrespectful to talk about a person's actions with an affiliate when you felt that, at least on some level, that very person's actions were uncalled for? And as I just explained to BlueSpeeder, you were talking about a matter that was very much in the public interest to the Wiki at large. If anyone walked in and saw what you two were talking about, it would've served as a foundation in which you could've explained to these new people what you feel is going on, and see if you can get their input on the matter. Finally, if Journalistic actually means well in how he conducts his behavior on the Wiki, I'd very much like to see this sentiment come straight from the man himself rather than any of his defenders. I want to hear his words and decide for myself whether or not he actually means well, because right now when it comes to the idea of him generally meaning well with how he conducts himself around the Wiki, especially as of right now during these past several hours, I feel the exact opposite is true.