Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20160829051027/@comment-4533965-20160904183534

Myself 123 wrote:

BlueSpeeder wrote:

Myself 123 wrote: Really? Ww're actually going through with this? It doesn't appear that any of my points have been countered, can anyone tell me why reducing the participants needed for censensus wouldn't work? Then again, maybe this is a sign of things to come. It appears that way, you are, like, the only one disagreeing with the "bureaucrat team with limited community input" idea. Actually, I recall seeing a couple of other users share my sentiments, so I'm not the only one. They were for against the full removal of community consensus. I'm referring to the new proposition for limited community consensus.