Thread:Ultrasonic9000/@comment-27441478-20160609083928/@comment-4220590-20160612132624

I am not sure what to say to this regarding references. However, if it is the only thing to go on, so it is not like there is any choice.

It is really good and detailed, but I think it is a little too conscious about its status as an article (For example "This is a (mostly) complete list of characters both permanently removed, or suspected permanently removed from the continuity due to the legal settlement as dictated by the ACP/Sega/Electronic Arts vs Penders collective cases.") I think it would be best to follow the examples on Wikipedia and try to make it sound less conscious about its structure. Otherwise, it is good work.