Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-24014422-20160917140241/@comment-1392727-20160918164658

Luma.dash wrote: Previously in this thread, the three chosen Bureaucrats decided to revert back to community consensus after feeling a lot of pressure put on them after the triumvirate idea gained community approval. So in the end, they revoked the project.

This sounds like people are reluctant to bring changes, in fear that they will make a mistake. We need more mistakes because that is how we can improve. If anyone is being harsh over someone else's mistake, or a change that was reverted then they are not being civil. We should welcome people trying new things, even if they were reverted. Personally, most of my changes I have made were not under community consensus, including some of the major ones. I changed the look completely multiple times without consensus (even made the buttons orange and the tab pink!), changed templates completely, changed people's edits almost entirely. Users should know that they can do these things too, without worrying about it too much.