Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20160908202646/@comment-679780-20160911224946

Ultrasonic9000 wrote: Mystic Monkey wrote: Ultrasonic9000 wrote: Mystic Monkey wrote: Well, it's not so bad. Sure w ewanted change for efficiency but I'm sure given time something will be proposed we can all get behind. Perhaps this "triumvirate" could have worked, but we were not comfortable with that job, nor do I think we were suitable for it. Instead of a triumvirate, what about a council?

In fact, how many beuros does SNN have in total? See here I see, isn't four beuros and a few admins enough to get major decisions done, even with community threads on it?

Perhaps a best solution to improove activity and progress would be to encourage the community who want improovements to SNN to make use of Site Discussion board as much as possible with suggestion threads. The community can and  the subject on the threads. Admins and beuros have the deciding vote or if the staff is not sure see what the community has to say about it.

Perhaps rename "Site Discussions" to "Site Suggestions" to make it more of an open board and less of an staff room.

After all the reason why we wanted an improoved system was because not enough $#!7 was getting done, however $#!7 definately got done when an idea was proposed, had a heavy thread to talk over it and a decision was made and done. Granted it kinda went awry and back to square one, but the point is A LOT has happened in the span of a few days, like less than a week, than it will ever happen on that old Element thing I made ages bak that no one touched.