Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20161121224449/@comment-477304-20161124012122

Kagimizu wrote: BlueSpeeder wrote: Kagimizu wrote: Getting back on track... I had no problem with having a back up or alternative interviewer in the case I wasn't available. But given Eclipse/Spyro is now MIA, I think getting a new back up- and a back up for the back up- would be a good start.

As for interesting interviews... Good grief. A while back I got in trouble before for being more animated and characterised in my interviews, so I opted into being more refrained and professional, asking relatively basic questions in someone's first interview so the wiki has a starting point for getting to know them. I can do interesting, but I need to know what people are expecting. Professional or personable?

But Bluespeeder, it still feels like you're blaming me for the interview so far not being done. When I meant by "interesting interviews" I didn't mean anything by it, just giving them a prefix to sound, well, interesting.

And I do think that you are not to blame: believe me, real life problems are much more importantly, college work is time consuming, I totally get you. I just think that you should at least have the interviews done a week or so before the month ends so you or someone else (in case you're busy) can post them on time.

I wasn't waiting due to MY issues. I thought METAL was busy. You can see the thread on Journal's Wall for that whole thing.

I try to keep interviews last minute despite the history of problems on the off-chance something changes in the poll, so I don't have the interview waiting just to find out someone else won.

....I could make a joke about current politics, but I won't. Yeah, jokes may fly over some people's heads here.