Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-24261123-20151124044652/@comment-24261123-20151125153628

Dr. Livsi wrote: Gensjs wrote: Hedgehogsonic11 is suggesting that we try to find ways to "build activity around the wiki", but never have I seen him use the word "force" anywhere in this blog.

The main thing he's fretting about is Skype vs. Chat, and saying to keep certain interactions on SNN so chat remains alive is forcing. Then saying "people can do what they want" is contradicting. So I'm not getting much sense. If this was just an awareness message, it likely won't be effective since users who are leaving are participating.

BlueSpeeder wrote: And it's our job to set up a good example for them.

Not really. If users come, they can accommodate themselves like how everyone else here did. Not everyone is inactive; and whoever is, such as Journo e.g, is good enough example. Simply bringing up the topic of users going inactive is irrelevant.

Overall, I think this whole situation is simply something people should come in terms with and not make an adjustments. Happens all the time. I'm not one to "come to terms with" a situation when something can be done. I stressed chat the most because that's the easiest thing to fix. The night I made this thread, there were 5 people on chat at most. Last night, the chat was filled. I don't really understand your opposition, if the solution presents itself in a simple manner. The other issues this wiki is facing are going to be behemoths, but the vacant chat can be solved easily. Skype VS Chat may never be solved, chat has its perks, quite a few, but that problem has been around for ages. Getting back on chat is the very least we can do.