Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-26409147-20150720170831/@comment-1392727-20150728121930

I'm slightly confused as to what point this thread is getting across.

Dr. Livsi wrote:

Secondly, making it compulsory to mention why you are supporting or opposing for every user right, mainly support. Clearly describe what made you support and why you think this person can run things around this wiki.
 * Plain signature votes are not trustful and don't count as opinions to make a change. The least a vote can comprise is "Per nomination" or something like that. A crat has to make a consensus out of the nomination only so do state why you are voting,
 * Along with ambiguous nominations to be removed as well.

The elaboration for this idea is clear. I don't really have much to say other than I support for the reasons you've stated.

But this

Dr. Livsi wrote:

Chat mod nominations need revision.

Is not written on the updated description of the thread. Could you elaborate, if you're still supporting this idea?