Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-5495117-20130925213053/@comment-24875466-20131212124914

PyroGothNerd wrote: Metalsonic1.0 wrote: PyroGothNerd wrote: He was basically arguing that the only reason people played the new games was because people were tired of pixelated sprites!!! He was doing the basic "Games are only good if the graphics are good" argument that twelve year olds who are new to gaming usually make, and it ticked me off. I probably could have handled it better, but he is TICKING ME OFF with those BAD arguments! I did not even mean that when I said what I said. What I meant was that more people wanted something newer for a game than people who liked the classics, not that everyone wanted something new. And I didnt even say "Games are only good if the graphics are good" I just said more people like games that you can move around more than the people who liked the games that you can just move foward, backward, jump, or bend down.

But a lot of gamers like old games. Plus, the newer games where you run forward can be frustrating. And you implied the newer technology was ONLY used because people were bored with the older games. That's not true! Every franchise wants to try something new every now and then. Dude. Just let it go. We, and I mean WE, can respect your opinion about not liking the modern installments. Just as long as you don't imply it is a fact. [Flame shield up] ...What?