Board Thread:Sonic News and Updates/@comment-2054358-20131003010118/@comment-2054358-20140329045651

Well, it's the template my Smash Bros. characters will end up on if I win the revote and they finally get back in the mainspace. Do you think it will be ironic that Sonic's home company Sega will end up with the least amount of crossover characters (besides the characters in the "other" part of the template?) I mean look, Sega has 14 Non-Sonic characters, Nintendo currently has 12 characters but after Project: Super Smash Bros. succeeds, it will have between 24 and 43 characters. Capcom has 21 characters. Well, don't blame me for those results. Even with cameos, Sega didn't have enough characters crossing over with Sonic. Nintendo and Sega decided to put Sonic in two Super Smash Bros. games, which is why I started the project in the first place. And despite the Mega Man characters not being playable twice with Sonic, we still did full coverage on World's Collide. I was okay with that because Mega Man played a big role in those comics, and being other media, how could they be playable? The one crossover character that bothers me is Toad, because he was never playable in those Mario crossovers. I'm okay with Toad as a character, but I'm not okay with Toad as an exception. He was only a referee. His story can be told in Cream the Rabbit's page as she was with him most of the time wasn't she? He might have been in six games with Sonic, but he wasn't playable. Just because of his page's existance, I could make articles on Bullet Bill, Goomba, Koopa Troopa, Shy Guy, King Boo, Lakitu and start working on userspace articles such as Palkia, Little Mac, Starfy, Andross, etc. I planned for Super Smash Bros. coverage before Smash 4 was even announced, which it was put in action when Sonic was announced to appear. I'm not going back on it just because of some mushroom guy permitting more non-playable characters or a Blue Bomber forcing a rule change. I started a discussion on Talk:Toad and didn't get a response.