Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-1392727-20151105170311/@comment-26409147-20151108155030

Journalistic wrote: Thanks, but I don't need to. Admins are free to make any subtle changes, go look at Drones and the amount of times she changed the background between 2010 to today. It doesn't matter who did it when, but if they're are complaints regarding an admin retouching the wiki too much, I'd still advise to make a sandbox.

You made the design guidline yourself, so any change, if better, doesn't have to follow it and can be renewed, because they're already complaints about the whole theme of the guideline, especially when it coincides the news channel and twitter, whilst, the channel and twitter should coincide the wiki, not the other way around. If the wiki look has to be downgraded to look like the news channel, the guideline shouldn't apply.

Also, this is my standalone opinion, if anyone can, I want them to breifly outline what they want the wiki to look like, in context of this guideline and Drones's changes,and be exact about it. Since I haven't heard a proper approval or dissaproval about the look as a whole, you guys aren't contributing or discussing in comparison to the changes being brought by Journo other than saying "completely renew it, or stop changing the look too much".