Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20141229233245/@comment-26567650-20150103001131

Beren Camlost wrote:

Genesjs wrote:

SonicTheHedgehogDude wrote:

Genesjs wrote:

Again, if there's Admins who're acting on their own in this manner, just reprimand them or punish them outright and move on. lol. It's been done several times, such as the updating of policy pages, backgrounds and whatnot. So are you saying we should punish all six admins provided below?

I'm not saying we should (I'm not even aware of anything else they could've done to warrant anyone here to want punishments to be made against them -- I only know what's been talked about here on this forum), but some of you seem to want to have something done about these Admins -- I'm simply saying that if you all really want some punishment done, make sure they are actually making some serious violations and do it. Besides, some people on this forum haven't been exactly clear on exactly what sort of actions they feel Admins could do without the permission of the community at large -- like updating policy pages (I see nothing wrong with updating information on them if something in the policies have changed, like an older rule being revised or a new one being implemented -- or even fixing any spelling or grammar errors that might be present in a line or two. To suggest that the Admins be held accountable for changing the Site Policy pages under these circumstances is downright foolish.), backgrounds and "whatnot" (what I don't understand about this is that, from what I've always been able to tell, ever since I first joined this Wiki, changing around the backgrounds for things like upcoming holidays and the like has never been an issue with anyone -- unless that has changed recently and I'm unaware of it? And as for other things, like images/buttons/headers on the front page and the like, which are more permanent than my first example, generally have to go through Site Discussions and be approved for use anyway -- so I don't see how this is an issue either, because regulations are clearly followed for instances like these.). The only things that have been made clear that some people here feel that the Admins shouldn't do was, and I quote BlueSpeeder, "changing the rules or removing the emoticons for your own well being without any foreword or mentioning."
 * Slug-Drones
 * Bullet Francisco
 * Eycestar
 * Mystic Monkey
 * Supermorff
 * SonicTheHedgehogDude

"Changing the rules for your own well being", I can understand, but what else besides this and the chat emoticons? Do you see what I'm saying about this? Very little has been made clear on what some of you don't want the Admins to do without the consent of the community. So, Dude, how can I ask for punishment to be made to those Admins for specific infractions when the infractions themselves haven't been made clear to us? I think that part of it with dude is that he gets angry really fast (or at least is perceived that way). Once I wrote that I agreed with someone who had just given up an argument he had had with dude. All I said was "agreed" (with the other persons argument). He immediately misquoted that other guy and yelled at me (with capitals). He did the same thing to Tails9whatever. ????? Really?