Thread:Genesjs/@comment-5075791-20150212234606/@comment-1392727-20150213051812

Kagimizu wrote: (sigh) Against Bullet's request, I'll explain...

He cut off his friendship with Sacor because he got sick of Sacor using sarcastic images in serious conversations. After that he refused to reply to Sacor's messages, and made a comment that could be taken a lot of ways. That, among other pre-existing issues, seemed to lead to Sacor making a demotion request aimed at Bullet.

I don't think it is entirely right to speak of Sacor's intention because I could say something incorrect about him, so I'll clearly state that this is just my opinion. I sincerely apologize if there's something incorrect here.

I believe what you wrote is untrue. Bullet and Sacor were in good terms the first time Sacor told me he'd support Bullet's demotion, but he was hesitant to for obvious reasons. Now that they're not in good terms, he probably merely felt a bit encouraged to create a demotion request. Note the objectivity of his actions. I have so far seen no sign of Sacor expressing personal dislike for Bullet. He has always been remarkably unbiased in several other situations, but I'd not rather go into detail. Only a disruptive user would put up a bureaucrat's demotion out of personal dislike.

Also, it appears you are accusing him for bias, which, to me is fine, but you wanted to say this privately. Incorrect assumptions have been made about me personally to administrators in the past. I had no say as I wasn't aware. When I found out, I calmly confronted the users responsible, but they outright lied about it despite the clear evidence I had with me. Although I minded it, I didn't create a fuss. However, I want the community to know that, normally, this can be pretty disruptive. Thank you, Gen, for not taking this to chat.