Board Thread:Archie Sonic/@comment-679780-20160803172757/@comment-679780-20160804005748

Vgiannell5 wrote: Mystic Monkey wrote:

Vgiannell5 wrote:

Mystic Monkey wrote:

Vgiannell5 wrote:

Operationgamer17 wrote: Ken Penders confirms he isn't involved. http://www.tssznews.com/2016/08/03/ken-penders-im-not-involved-with-archienarrative-ark-lawsuit-filing/ I suspect that might turn out to be a big fat lie. He already got his characters back, why else would he want to kick Archie Sonic down in the dirt? Money. He probably didn't get it after his lawsuit against Archie was settled. But this current lawsuit has nothing to do with him, he still won't get money out of all this. That's probably what he wanted us to believe. But I think he secretly had a hand in it to get the money he felt he should've had in the first place. I will suspect Penders for the absence of his work for hire contract with Archie that allowed him to ge what he wanted in the end. But my suspicion doesn't mean proof.

But being involved in this current lawsuit is just too much of a stretch to believe in. Penders would get nothing out of this lawsuit other than petty revenge and while I may suspect him underhanded, I don't think canceling the comics for personal vendetta isn't his thing.

If anything I think he now has it that if Archie Comics reprint pre-SGW comics he had made (such as the ongoing Sonic Archives reprinting back issues or future reprints for special reasons) he is entitled to payment from Archie. So if Archie discontinues the Sonic comics he will be a bit of a loss.