Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-679780-20140506144907/@comment-1669199-20140507213120

Mystic Monkey wrote: I can't read the American comics from here but from what I understand on the Mobius Wiki, the comic worked itself into a corner, Ken Penders who did most of the comic quits and not only took his characters with him but half of the entire comics history as well in which the whole history has been revamped to be more like the games, you know, than actually being more like the games to begin with.

This made me wonder, is Sonic the Comic, despite switching from a few comics and fortnightly to fewer comics every blue-moon, is it actually better than Archie Sonic comics now?

Sure Dr. Robotniks brain is broken and needs to be plugged into Egg Bastion to artificially be "sane", but still the comics can continue Sonic as a fallen hero or have Robotnik regenerate if they wanted too go back to older roots.

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. Because of the whole lawsuit business, the Archie Comics ended up having to get rid of a lot of its material for future use within the foreseeable future (possibly for good), I think everyone understands that -- but how does this situation possibly make Sonic the Comic "better" than Archie now? I fail to understand how not being able to no longer use material makes Archie's competition any better, because its not like all that stuff in Archie never happened in the first place -- something even the main cast has acknowledged ever since the beginning of the soft-reboot. In fact, with the whole soft-reboot thing going on there's a chance for the comics to write off any plotholes and other issues that the previous issues in the comic couldn't easily and quickly resolve, so the potential Archie has now to turn itself into something more consistent can help it considerably in terms of overall quality.

I'm pretty much assuming things on your part, I know, but if I'm mistaken then perhaps you'd be willing to clarify things for me?