Sonic News Network:Requests for User Rights

Requests for adminship (RfA) is the process by which this wiki's community decides who will become administrators (also known as admins or sysops), who are users with access to additional features, most notably the ability to delete pages and to block users. A user either submits his/her own request for adminship (a self-nomination) or is nominated by another user. Please become familiar with the Administrators' how-to guide before submitting your request. This process is modeled around Wikipedia's RfA process, and more information can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.

Layout
The following layout must by used for all new nominations. Nominators are encouraged to use the following code as a template, added as a new section under the current nominations and customized for the specific nominee.

Word bubbles must not be used as they interfere with numbering, and signatures must contain no line breaks. Signatures must contain a link to the relevant user's user page but no links to the pages of other users.

Username (rank requested)
Username (talk): Contributions Edit Count

Short section describing nominee's suitability for rank requested. Signature of nominator to be included at end of paragraph, along with the date of nomination.


 * For nominations by other users only, a single bulleted paragraph by the nominee accepting the nomination. Signature of nominee to be included at end of paragraph.

Discussion

 * Comments in short, signed, bulleted paragraphs.
 * Responses to specific comments should be offset with an extra asterisk. Responses should also be short, signed, single paragraphs.

Note: Adminship is not taken lightly. Nominators may want to spend time on their requests. The short section should cover reasons why the nominee would be expected to use admin tools appropriately and demonstrate that they are dedicated to the wiki. It should also explain why giving them such tools will further the aims of the wiki.

Discussion
Once a nomination has been made, users will review the nominee and declare their support or opposition by placing a short comments and their signature in the 'Support' or 'Oppose' sections (in the format of a numbered list, i.e. preceded by #). As above, word bubbles must not be used as they interfere with numbering and there must be no line breaks. Signatures must contain a link to the relevant user's user page but no links to the pages of other users. Do not try and include your entire thought process in such comments; only include the key reason or reasons for your vote.

At the same time, users are encouraged to explain their decision in the 'Discussion' section.

The 'Discussion' section can be used for further commentary or for asking the nominee questions in order to clarify your position. Comments must be short, single paragraphs in a bulleted list and include a signature. Again, do not use word bubbles, even if you frequently use one on talk pages.

Direct responses to a bulleted comment (e.g. by the nominee) should be placed directly after the comment and indented with one additional bullet point. (That is, a comment preceded by a single asterisk * would be followed by a comment preceded by two asterisks **. If you have trouble formatting lists in this way, it is recommended that you go to Special:Preferences and deactivate the visual editor under the 'Editing' tab.)

Any user can contribute to the discussion or declare support or opposition, but opinions have more weight if backed up by reasons and evidence (e.g. occasions in which the nominee has done particularly good or bad work). The opinions of long-standing users, particularly current administrators, will also tend to hold more weight than recently-joined or inexperienced users.

Resolution
Adminship and bureaucrat nominations will last for two weeks; rollback and chat moderator nominations will last for one week. In this time, nominations must have received a sufficient number of participants in order to be valid. For rollback or chat mod requests, 5 users must have participated. For adminship requests, 10 users must have participated. For bureaucrat requests, 15 users must have participated. Nominations that have not reached this quorum level at the end of the relevant period have failed. (Note that participants include those who comment and remain neutral.)

This is not a majority vote. It is an attempt to assess the community's consensus regarding the candidate. The candidate should have the support of most of the community, so if the vote is close, the candidate will probably not be given adminship.

After the two weeks have passed, a bureaucrat (a user who has even more rights than an administrator, and can give other users admin rights) will read through the request, determine the community's consensus about whether the nominee should be made an admin, and close the discussion. The discussion will be removed from this page, but is still accessible through the page's edit history.

Demotion discussions will last as long and require the same number of participants as promotion discussions about the same rank.

If a nominee decides at any time that they do not wish to pursue a promotion for themselves, they are welcome to remove the discussion entirely before it comes to a conclusion. However, a nominee is not permitted to remove a demotion request.

A nominator is entitled to remove any discussion they have posted (including a demotion request) if no other users have yet commented.

Advice
Here are some pieces of advice for nominators and nominees:
 * Follow the process as described above. Failure to do so will harm your chances of success.
 * Demonstrate that you understand what being an admin involves. Read through Help:Administrators' how-to guide if you are not familiar with the role.
 * Being a good user is not sufficient to be made an admin. Do not bring up number of edits, number of pages created, being nice to other users, not engaging in vandalism, or knowledge of the Sonic series. Only users widely recognized as good users should be nominated for adminship (those that have not demonstrated this through their work will have their nominations rejected quickly) and they do not need to prove this again during the debate for adminship.
 * Don't expect that the community will be familiar with your work. You must provide evidence. In its simplest form, this may include listing pages (or talk pages) where you have been particularly influential, but preferably you should provide a link to the Diff pages of major edits you make.
 * Don't expect that the community will necessarily be aware of your nomination. You are advised to request comments from regular users, particularly admins (a list of whom can be found here). Note, however, that only asking your own friends to comment is usually transparent and may harm your chances in the long run.
 * If you are an admin on another wiki site, this can provide good evidence of your suitability for adminship, assuming either you have been granted adminship in recognition of the work you have done on the site (as opposed to receiving it because you founded the site or were one of the only users) or you have been an effective admin having received the privileges. You must provide a link to the site in question.
 * Don't lie, as doing so will almost certainly result in a failed nomination.
 * Remember that this is not a talk page. Please keep discussions relevant to the matter at hand and do not start to chat. For instance, try not to thank everybody who votes in your favour.
 * The ideal candidate is one who is being prevented from carrying out work by the limitations of their user rights. If you can demonstrate that you would have used admin rights in the past (e.g. by tagging pages for deletion that were subsequently deleted, or informing an admin about a vandal that was subsequently blocked), provide evidence for this. Don't attempt to influence the discussion by promising to do something or act differently if you are successful, as this is a sign that you are not yet ready.
 * Don't talk about things that you don't do, only things that you do do.
 * Please be civil!
 * Don't be biased. In your reasons for voting, do not state such things as because you are "best friends" with a nominee. Your vote will be removed if it is seen as being biased.

Current nominations
Here are the users who are currently nominated for sysop, rollback, bureaucrat, or other privileges. New nominations must be added below this line.

Bullet Francisco (Adminship)
Bullet Francisco (talk) Contributions Editcount

Here I am. I am renominating myself for the position of administrator of the Sonic News Network. While my reasons for having the rights remain the same, I want everyone to think about this. The way I handled the tools wasn't necessarily bad, it's just the things I did off-site. Since then, I have grown up, I have matured, I've changed. I'm going to keep this short and sweet, and I apologize for all things I've done in the past that may have offended anyone. Please, think about my nomination, and please, remember the good in me, not the bad. Thank you for your time. -- 23:56, July 8, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * Yes, I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  05:11, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Yes. You'd be a great Administrator! [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] 05:12, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Yes: He has matured and deserves to get back in the saddle. 05:16, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Certainly. You're an outstanding user with undeniable knowledge and experience. I wish you luck. 05:23, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) There are times where an admin was needed and Bullet was the only one active. I keep forgetting that he's not an admin.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:26, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Per all of the above. SonicRunPeace.gif'Mariosonic15  I always race to win! Tailsbye.gif 05:34, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Yes: All I have to do is know you, and I know you're ready. Lightning   the   Hedgehog
 * 7) I'm one of the many Users who have been wanting you back in Administrative position for a while now. It'd be good to see you back on the Admin staff again. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  07:01, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Yup I support
 * 9) Bullet is more than experienced than to re-take his title as an Administrator.I definitely support. 09:08, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) You're mature, responsible and wise. Good enough then, good enough now -- Murphyshane -  熱! Don't click here   09:49, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) I think you are ready again, and have paid your debt. Good luck! Time Biter  "The Rift"  11:33, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) Go for it, Bullet! 14:19, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) Yes, you're one of the most trust worthy people I know on the wiki, as mod you used it greatly, and you help the wiki out with your knowledge of coding, and I have pretty much no reason to oppose. We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  15:10, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) Yes: Ever since Bullet came back to the wiki, he has been very involved in the wiki's growth by creating various site discussions that have benefitted the wiki.  Myself  123  19:04, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) Supermorff (talk) 19:08, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) Yea! ☯ModrenSonic   The Ultimate Ninja☯  19:50, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) If I were a Bureaucrat, and the consensus allowed, I would promote you myself.-- 12:31, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) If I could I would promote you in a heart beat. Go for it, you've earned it. Thunder the Hedgehog  13:31, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 19) Yes - Everyone deserves a second chance. Just dont dissappoint. Phantom The Shadow Plasma  20:04, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 20) Per all. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 21) He's reponsible enough to be an admin. I think he was good when he was and admin, and I think he'll be better this time.Zackery Willson (talk) 17:42, July 20, 2012 (UTC)BlueSpeeder-12:42pm-7/20/12
 * 22) Perr gen, Chao-happy.gif Dont mess wit dah pandahs  Chao-happy.gif

Discussion

 * This and other nominations went up on 17 July didn't they? I just noticed that BF's signature at the top says they went up on 8 July, which I'm sure is not right. -- Supermorff (talk) 07:41, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * ...Glitch? I posted them on July 17th... Should I keep that as a timestamp, and leave it alone, or should I go through the history and replace the timestamps? -- 07:59, July 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't mind. It's obvious enough when they went up because the first voters have timestamps for the 17th. -- Supermorff (talk) 09:33, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

Ediskrad327 (Rollback)
Ediskrad327 (talk) Contributions Editcount

I nominate Ediskrad327 for the position of Rollback on the Sonic News Network. Ediskrad327 is a long-standing user, having been here since late 2010. He has remained active since he joined, and is on the wiki almost every day. He mainly looks at the edits that have been happening on the wiki, and he reverts unconstructive edits and vandalism actively. The rollback tool would be beneficial to him, as he usually looks at the WikiActivity, and can revert edits faster. A good amount of his edits are in the mainspace, and he is a good-faith editor. He's a good user, with a clean record, and I see no reason not to give him the position of rollback on the wiki, as it would be beneficial to him and to the wiki. -- 23:56, July 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * i have experience in other wikis fighting vandalism so i'd be grateful for this opportunity to happen and continue my fight against vandals and bad edits --Ediskrad327 (talk) 05:14, July 18, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As the poster. -- 23:56, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) yes,  I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  05:11, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Yes: He is a very good contributor and deserves this promotion.  05:17, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Checked your contributions, and you seem to be quite constructive. I don't have any reasons to not support. 05:48, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Per DF. Lightning   the   Hedgehog
 * 6) I think he'd be okay as a Rollback. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  07:02, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Per Gen. [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] 07:11, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Per Gen. 09:09, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) I think he's ready for this. Go get it. The Shadow Of Darkness (talk) 13:00, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10)  Myself  123  16:01, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) Per all. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) YES. Chao-happy.gif Dont mess wit dah pandahs  Chao-happy.gif

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Oppose


VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Conclusion
Yes - Community consensus seems unanimous in your favor, Ediskrad327. As such, Rollback privileges will now be bestowed upon you. Congradulations! This nomination will be closed shortly. Lloyd the Cat "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  11:30, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Trak Nar (Rollback)
Trak Nar (talk) Contributions Editcount

I nominate Trak Nar for the position of Rollback on the Sonic News Network. Aside from being a 4-year (going on 5) old wiki veteran, Trak Nar is also an administrator at Wookiepedia and Star Wars Fanon. Trak Nar is an experienced wiki editor (obviously), and is also very active here on the Sonic News Network. She reverts unconstructive edits, and she's been editing in good faith since day one. I see absolutely no reason why Trak Nar shouldn't have the rights. She's active, she has a good amount of edits, and she's experienced on both other wikis and this one. -- 23:56, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Heh, you would not believe the amount of times I've been searching for that Rollback button whenever vandals and/or unhelpful edits show up. XD Since I'm a Recent Changes patroller, I usually spot miscreants, particularly in the wee hours of the night. I'd be honored to have rollback candy here.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:20, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As the poster. -- 23:56, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Yes I support. [[File:Will Life Icon.png]]  Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] 05:09, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Yep. I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  05:11, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Yes: She is a great contributor and deserves a promotion 05:13, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Heck yeah. She just came to the wiki a few weeks ago and already has a lot of edits. More than some of the rollbacks we already have.--- Fly the Fox    Rainbow Dash    Contributions     05:24, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Contributions are good. Overall dedication to the wiki is flawless. Go for it. 05:26, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) She's a hard working, civil User who knows her stuff when it comes to editing, so Rollback privileges should help making editing easier for her. Even I feel I could learn a thing or two from her when it comes to editing. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  06:59, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) *She. :P  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:50, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *... Gah! My sincerest apologies, miss. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  09:07, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Trak Nar is more than worthy enough for this position, she's kind, extremely helpful, and fully experienced. I'll gladly support. 10:14, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) Yes: Trak is a very responsible user. Time Biter  "The Rift"  11:33, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) I think she is worthy of Rollback. The Shadow Of Darkness (talk) 13:00, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) Absolutely. 15:35, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) Supermorff (talk) 19:08, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15)  Myself  123  16:02, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) Sure. ☯ModrenSonic   The Ultimate Ninja☯  00:13, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) Per all. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) Per Bullet-Dude Chao-happy.gif Dont mess wit dah pandahs  Chao-happy.gif
 * 11:44, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) I support. We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  20:01, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) I support. We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  20:01, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Oppose


VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Discussion

 * Trak Nar's a girl, Gen. :P -- 07:24, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

Conclusion
Yes - Community consensus is apparently unanimous in your favor, Trak. I'm pleased to say that as of now you'll have Rollback privileges bestowed upon you. Congradulations! This discussion shall be closed shortly. Lloyd the Cat "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  11:30, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Myself 123 (Bureaucrat)
Myself 123 (talk) Contributions Editcount

I nominate Myself 123 for the position of Bureaucrat on the Sonic News Network. Myself 123 has been on the Sonic News Network for a long time, and has also been an administrator for a long time. Myself 123 is experienced with the bureaucrat tool, and is no doubt ready to take on bureaucrat. Myself 123 also contributes to the wiki a lot, currently having the second most edits (behind Supermorff) on the wiki. Myself 123 helps all users who need it, he is a very kind user, and without a doubt a fantastic administrator. To be honest, I think a promotion for Myself 123 is long overdue. There is no doubt in my mind Myself 123 will be a fantastic bureaucrat should he get the rights, as he is already one of our best contributors. Some people may say three active bureaucrats may be too much, but I honestly fail to agree. (Due to the fact we've had 3 active bureaucrats on the wiki before, and when it was much smaller) It honestly can't hurt to have another active bureaucrat, especially when it is one who will do a fantastic job at that. -- 23:56, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * While there may already be two bureaucrats on the wiki, I think a third may be needed to fulfil obligations if the other two cannot. I think I would be suitable for the role as I am highly committed to the wiki and have been editing here since September 2008. I also get involved with site discussions regarding the wiki's growth and help users when asked.  Myself  123  21:00, July 19, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As the poster. -- 23:56, July 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Hecks yea, I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  05:11, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Yes: I believe that Myself123 would make an excellent 'crat and will halp out Genesjs and Supermorff well. 05:19, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) I have no arguments against Myself. He's well deserving of this promotion. 05:28, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) The more BCs, the better, especially with the recent MediaWiki upgrade. He'll be able to get into the inner workings of the wiki and apply fixes.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:30, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) I think Myself is definitely worthy of a Crat position. As stated, he's a hard-working, likeable User who even has experience in using Crat privileges. Also, it'd be nice for me to have a second fellow Crat to nag on occassion~ Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  07:06, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) I see no reason not to support
 * 8) Yesss. [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] 09:10, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) All in agreement with your post, Bullet. 10:16, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Per above. The Shadow Of Darkness (talk) 13:00, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) Heck yeah! Myself is a great user, contributions-wise and user-wise. 14:44, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) One of the best editors, great admin, a lot of reasons to support that others stated, no reason to oppose, so I support. We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  22:24, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) Per all of the above.-- 13:28, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) Per all. Thunder the Hedgehog  13:33, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) No reason why not to. I think he totally deserves it. He's been here as long as I have been here; even a little bit longer. He's been admin for long enough. Now I think he deserves something bigger; bureaucrat. --Rainbowroad6w, the researcher. ( Talk )( Recent finds and updates. ) 14:31, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) Yes--- Fly the Fox    Rainbow Dash   <span style="border: 2px solid silver; border-top-right-radius:1ex; border-bottom-right-radius:1ex; -moz-border-radius-topright:1ex; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:3ex;"> Contributions <span style="padding-right:2px; color:silver; background-color:#2C75FF; border-top-right-radius:1ex; border-bottom-right-radius:1ex; -moz-border-radius-topright:1ex; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:3ex;">    14:49, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) Yes - Like stated before, the dude has been here forever. he's been an admin forever. he's been more than helpful, and i dont remember ANY incidents where he caused any problems. n fact, any he got involved in he ended then and there. I believe he would make a very good bureaucrat. You have my support. <font color="Black">Phantom <font color="Black">The Shadow Plasma  20:01, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) Absolutely Myself is one of the most responsible users SNN has to offer. He makes good judgments, he isn't afraid to take matters into his own hands and he never abuses power. I smell a promotion coming towards him -- <font color="Crimson">Murphyshane - <font color="#00b6ee"> 熱! <font color="#C0C0C0">Don't click here   21:13, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 19) Per all. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 20) Per Speng, Chao-happy.gif Dont mess wit dah pandahs  Chao-happy.gif

Discussion

 * This may be a case of shooting myself in the foot here, but I haven't actually had a chance to use my bureaucratic rights on the Scott Pilgrim wiki. Before my unexpected hiatus, the SP wiki did start to gain a small community and I was going to open a Requests For Adminship page, but my computer died. The wiki's sort of dead now, there's only a couple of users who edit there and even then it's not regular.  Myself  <font color="Black">123  18:35, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Myself, it's up to you, but if you want to be considered then you need to formally accept the nomination in the standard way before the time period is up. -- Supermorff (talk) 20:39, July 19, 2012 (UTC)

FreeSmudger (Administrator)
FreeSmudger (talk) Contributions Editcount

I've been on this wiki for quite some time and I've worked very hard editing it with the aid of my Rollback status as well as monitoring the chat with my chat mod status and overall I am very active on this wiki. I’ve also frequently put the deletion tag on spam pages. Here are some links to examples of my reverts of vandalism:


 * 


 * 


 * 


 * 


 * 

As Admin I would block troublesome users (as well as their sock puppets) after a sufficient amount of warnings, help new users, and delete unneeded pages and underused images. I truly love this wiki and have ever since I joined. I remember in my early days I gave the wiki a chat and then moderated it for many months. I want to help this wiki grow some more with my admin powers if you the community think I deserve to be able to use them. 05:10, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) There is no doubt in my mind: I have nothing but the up-most respect for FreeSmudger. I've known him and I've been close friends with him ever for almost a year now, and being friends with him is far from the reason I am supporting him. Free Smudger is a fantastic user. There is no doubt in my mind that FreeSmudger will be a fantastic admin, should he get the position. FreeSmudger is a fantastic chat moderator, has made great use of the Rollback tool, and is an experienced wiki editor, who has been at the Sonic News Network for a year now. The tools will be nothing but beneficial to the wiki and to FreeSmudger. He constantly tags pages for deletion, he edits actively, he helps any user who needs it, he follows all Sonic News Network policies, and even though his editcount may be considerably less than other admins, quality>quantity definitely applies in this case. FreeSmudger has done major overhaul and cleanup on many articles. I have nothing but praise to say about this user, and I have no doubt in my mind he will be a fantastic administrator. -- 05:11, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Bullet.  I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  05:12, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Bullet. [[File:Will Life Icon.png]]  Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] 05:15, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) I support a fellow Wookieepedian. Even a fellow former Wookieepedian.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:29, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Per Bullet. FreeSmudger would make an outstanding admin. I look forward to administrating alongside you if you get the promotion. Best of luck to you. 05:31, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Per Bullet. I see no reason to not let Free become an admin. He would make one of the best ones, if he gets the rights. Lightning   the   Hedgehog
 * 7) Yerp. -CariconCommander (talk) 07:04, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Considering his past experiences, I'd say I'm open for another Administrator on the wiki. Free is very mature from what I've observed, and as Bullet pointed out, he edits quite frequently, has experience as a Moderator, deals with unnecessary pages, and removes spam. A very constructive editor, who can take on Adminship rights any day. 10:20, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) Per all above. The Shadow Of Darkness (talk) 13:00, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) I support, I have no reason to oppose, all I have is great reasons to support. (Basically, Per Kyle) We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  15:31, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) Per all of the above. SonicRunPeace.gif'<font color="#green">Mariosonic15  I always race to win! Tailsbye.gif 19:08, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) Per Bullet. You are a great user and should have these rights. --- <span style="border: 2px solid silver; border-top-left-radius:1ex; border-bottom-left-radius:1ex; -moz-border-radius-topleft:1ex; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:3ex;"><span style="padding-left:2px; color:skyblue; background-color:#2C75FF; border-top-left-radius:1ex; border-bottom-left-radius:1ex; -moz-border-radius-topleft:1ex; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:4ex;">Fly the Fox    Rainbow Dash   <span style="border: 2px solid silver; border-top-right-radius:1ex; border-bottom-right-radius:1ex; -moz-border-radius-topright:1ex; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:3ex;"> Contributions <span style="padding-right:2px; color:silver; background-color:#2C75FF; border-top-right-radius:1ex; border-bottom-right-radius:1ex; -moz-border-radius-topright:1ex; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:3ex;">    21:23, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) Per all. You deserve it. ☯ModrenSonic   The Ultimate Ninja☯  21:34, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) I think you're now ready to have a shot at an Administrative position. Best of luck if you get it. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  23:54, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) I have no objections. All the good reasons have been presented. He has my vote.-- 13:26, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) Per Bullet, there is no better way to sum free up then that. Thunder the Hedgehog  13:36, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) OTAY: That's a lot of words, but I'm gonna say yes. Tyler the Hedgehog  <font color="Red">"The ultimate son of a gun Charmcaster!"  20:35, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) sure Razor the Eagle  "Lucas, I am The Pudding King"  20:41, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 19) Per all above. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 20) One of the best editors on Sonic News Network, I support Free to be an admin. One thing had struck me though; why become an admin this quick? Per Bullet.Zackery Willson (talk) 17:50, July 20, 2012 (UTC)BlueSpeeder-12:50pm-7/20/12
 * 21) Per the poster. Chao-happy.gif Dont mess wit dah pandahs  Chao-happy.gif
 * 22) No objections; I'm all for you! Shadowunleashed13 "I am...none of me..."   23:44, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) I also oppose this for my own reasons. It seems you only joined, the August of last year. A lot of your edits come from User pages, blogs, speaking with other users, fanart etc. Though I will admit over half of your edits are mainspace. You've also been recently made a Chat Moderator. So now you're looking for Adminship? (even though alot of users think editcounts don't matter I still add this) Your edit count is also only about 3000. Don't think that will help, many users became admins when their edit counts were much higher (mine was 11,000). So I'm sorry for voting against you, but I must say what I believe. -- <font color="Crimson">Murphyshane - <font color="#00b6ee"> 熱! <font color="#C0C0C0">Don't click here   09:58, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) I honestly think we have enough admins. And I'm not sure if he's worthy enough yet. But I'm not sure why I'd say that... Someone's gonna attack me with all the reasons he should be admin. --Rainbowroad6w, the researcher. ( Talk )( Recent finds and updates. ) 14:32, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) You know, I don't know why, but I just don't think you're ready quite yet. Not because you don't have enough edits or something to that effect, but I just don't think you're ready quite yet. I know people will get upset at me for this, but still. 19:43, July 19, 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

 * @Murphy He's been here for a year, he got Chat Mod almost a year ago, and got rollback over 7 months ago. Also, he doesn't do very many minor edits, a lot of his edits are overhaul edits and reverting cases of vandalism. Quality > Quantity. -- 10:01, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * I wrote a pretty long message in the discussion on my apology on some parts but still do not accept this nomination and all but due to edit conflict its.... gone ;_; --You want it with duck or without? 10:49, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * You realize you can go to the bottom of the page and it allows you to recopy it? -- 10:51, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Free, I would like to point out that in the advice column, it says not to give examples. Just letting you know. Time Biter  "The Rift"  11:33, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * No it doesn't Biter, on the fourth bullet point it says to provide evidence. 18:58, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * While I quite like your nomination, I've spent some time today reverting edits you made because of problems in the wiki markup. That's a concern, and is probably simply because you use the real text editor, but could become more of an issue if you had extra privileges. -- Supermorff (talk) 19:18, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? I use source mode almost all of the time. 20:28, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Really? Weird. Have a look at some of my recent edits that reverted yours to see what I mean. I'll give you a link if you can't find them. -- Supermorff (talk) 20:36, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * There is a glitch that's been around for awhile when you start in Visual Mode by default (Because you have not turned it off) and switch to Source Mode, and back and forth (sometimes you only need to switch once) it glitches a bunch and causes problems in wiki markup. You can go to your preferences and turn Visual Mode off. -- 20:40, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh wait, I see the problem. The edits I made there were used in visual mode, I was just adding periods to the end of the "so and so"'s title screen and I used visual mode. I really should have used source mode, sorry about that incident. But asside from that incident I use source mode. 20:47, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Regarding the whole "never edits in the mainspace", about 55% of his edits are mainspace, he has more mainspace then a lot of the other admins do, so I don't see an issue here. -- 21:07, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * @Murphyshane: I may have joined a little less than a year, but several admins like Kagimizu, Sonicrox14, Supermorff, and several other admins all got their adminship within a year of them joining. As for my edits, I make my edits full of quality. Currently my mainspace editcount is higher than Genesjs, Admiral Levithan and more admin's mainspace editcounts. My overall editcount is higher than Bionicleboy3000. As for my other edits, it varies. I edit my userpage mostly because other users are sending me artwork they made for me and I use talk pages when another user needs help or I am dealing with a vandal, I hardly ever use them to chat with them. I use the chat for that. I also don't upload fanart that much compared to other users even some admins like you. You say like I just joined this wiki when that isn't true like stated previously it's almost been a year, and it may seem like yesterday due to your recent comeback from inactivity. I'm not trying to sound rude, that wasn't my intention. and if you are offended by this I am deeply sorry. Thank you for taking your time with this message. 21:45, July 19, 2012 (UTC)


 * Hmmm...most of what you said is beginning to change my mind, over the next few days I'll keep an eye on you and if I see something that impresses me, I'll change my vote. -- <font color="Crimson">Murphyshane - <font color="#00b6ee"> 熱! <font color="#C0C0C0">Don't click here   21:51, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately starting tomorrow, I will be going on vacation to the beach with my family and a friend. However, I will be checking on the wiki but with minimal editing. 21:58, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * I've looked over some things in your contribs and apparently, you've created a total of 14 articles, that would really help your chances of adminship. -- <font color="Crimson">Murphyshane - <font color="#00b6ee"> 熱! <font color="#C0C0C0">Don't click here   23:12, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, creating articles does not help chances of adminship, because creating articles is completely irrelevant to adminship. Admins have no new abilities over regular users that will facilitate article creation. -- Supermorff (talk) 07:10, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

Conclusion
Yes - While your nomination attracted neutrality, your general support managed to pull through with only 3 opposers. Congratulations! You are once again a Chat Moderator. This discussion will be removed shortly. 00:30, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Fly the Fox (Chat Moderator)
Fly the Fox (talk) Contributions Editcount

I, Fly the Fox, nominate myself for chat mod. I'm usually cool under pressure, and usually on chat most of the time. I edit the wiki regularly now. I could use the chat moderator rights to mine and the wiki's advantage, and I could use the rights to help solve arguments. Thank you. --23:37, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Absolutely: I support. Fly is a very mature young man. I've known him and have been close to him since I joined back in February of 2012. I've seen him grow, and he's always been very close to me throughout this all. Fly has been on chat for 12 hours a day everyday since his return to the wiki. Now, I don't have much to say about him but that I have the most upmost respect for him. I know what he's gone through, and he has matured while still maintaining his personality and spirit. Something very rare in today's society. On the wiki, he's been just the same. Fly's been dealing with arguments and issues a lot recently, and a promotion seems to be overdue. -- 06:03, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Yes, he has been very mature on chat, and he deserves these rights.  I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  06:05, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Bullet. Good luck. 06:09, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Fly has been on the chat a lot recently, and has shown himself to be very mature. I support. Lightning   the   Hedgehog
 * 5) Fly seems pretty level from what I've seen. A bit rambunctious at times, particularly regarding MLP, but honestly... it's really no different from the behavior I've seen on IRC from other people. Chats tend to be a bit more looser, and oftentimes, we feel freer to act silly. I see no problem with acting silly. As long as one maintains a civil attitude when conflict arises, then who cares if one also feels like doing a bit of harmless trolling on the channel? As long as it doesn't devolve into personal attacks and the individual can remain in control, then nothing wrong with having a bit of fun. It's like when I'll post an image of an insect or spider on IRC; I know that no one but me likes bugs and spiders. I know that almost everyone on the channel is wary about them. However, I admit that I get a laugh when I see a "KILL IT WITH FIRE!" response to an image that is clearly labeled as depicting an insect. :P It's harmless.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:38, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) I'm changing my mind.I'm supporting (I only put that message in the discussion cause I was having a bad day at school). Fly diserves to be a chatmod. [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] 08:13, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) I'll support. 10:27, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) I think you're ready for Chat Mod. 15:00, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) Yes, you have shown that you could be a good mod. We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  15:22, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Yes: Per Bullet 15:27, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) I certainly hope you'll do well if granted Chat Mod rights. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  20:41, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) Per all. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) Per all. Chao-happy.gif Dont mess wit dah pandahs  Chao-happy.gif

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Opposition
VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Discussion

 * @CC That isn't a reason, and this isn't a joke. -- 06:54, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Meh. Nothing's anything these days. -CariconCommander (talk) 06:58, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * @CC: I agree with Bullet on this one. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  06:57, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Per Kyle. Lightning   the   Hedgehog


 * Should we remove his comment then unless he provides a better reason? -- 07:00, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know. You do go on chat for a long time. But you do be rude at times at least when I'm on. As you keep telling me to watch MLP even though I'm not interested with it or interested in watching the show. [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] 07:00, July 17, 2012 (UTC)


 * That's on Skype, Skype has nothing to do with SNN Chat. -- 07:04, July 17, 2012 (UTC)


 * Gen, why do you want to see him get rollback before he becomes a chat mod? The two roles are completely distinct. -- Supermorff (talk) 19:45, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * I just thought that's normally a common reason to oppose certain nominations around here? We let Users climb from the bottom of the barrel in order to show that they'd do well in the lower ranks before some of us even consider letting them go for the higher ranks? Is it a problem for me to do this? Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  20:23, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * SpyroSonic2000, Mariosonic15, SandrathePorcupine, The Shadow of Darkness, FreeSmudger, and MetalShadow272 were all promoted to Chat Mod before rollback. -- 20:27, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Gen, you can vote however you like for whatever reason you like, but these aren't "ranks" and they aren't in a hierarchy. Chat mod is a completely different role with a different set of necessary skills to rollback. However, admins do have all the privileges related to both roles and should be expected to have the necessary skills of both, so it makes more sense to me to say "Use rollback/chat mod before being an admin". -- Supermorff (talk) 20:32, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * I wasn't trying to imply anything relating to a hierarchy. I just used the word "rank" because it was easier to write than "Rollback/Chat Mod Rights/Privileges". I also realize the difference between a Chat Mod and Rollback's powers, so I can assure you that you don't need to remind me. And Bullet makes a point, so I guess I'll reconsider my vote. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  20:38, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I seemed a little condescending and I honestly don't mind how you vote. -- Supermorff (talk) 20:49, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's alright, I know you didn't intend any harm by it. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  20:56, July 19, 2012 (UTC)

Conclusion
Yes - Consensus is clearly in favor of your nomination request for Chat Moderator rights. Congratulations! This discussion will be removed shortly. 00:30, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Fly the Fox (Rollback)
Fly the Fox (talk) Contributions Editcount

I nominate Fly the Fox for Rollback. Fly is very level headed and mature. He is a long standing user, as he has been editing since January 2011. He edits actively, and also reverts edits. He knows the ropes, and a promotion to rollback seems overdue. -- 06:14, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

I've been editing a lot recently and I think I deseve a promotion.--- <span style="border: 2px solid silver; border-top-left-radius:1ex; border-bottom-left-radius:1ex; -moz-border-radius-topleft:1ex; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:3ex;"><span style="padding-left:2px; color:skyblue; background-color:#2C75FF; border-top-left-radius:1ex; border-bottom-left-radius:1ex; -moz-border-radius-topleft:1ex; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:4ex;">Fly the Fox    Rainbow Dash   <span style="border: 2px solid silver; border-top-right-radius:1ex; border-bottom-right-radius:1ex; -moz-border-radius-topright:1ex; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:3ex;"> Contributions <span style="padding-right:2px; color:silver; background-color:#2C75FF; border-top-right-radius:1ex; border-bottom-right-radius:1ex; -moz-border-radius-topright:1ex; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:3ex;">    01:49, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As poster. --
 * 2) I concur with these statements. 06:16, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:26, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * yes, I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  06:28, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Yep. Lightning   the   Hedgehog
 * 2) I think you'd make a decent Rollback. Try to prove me right. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  06:52, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) I'll support for both rights he desires. 10:26, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Per the poster. The Shadow Of Darkness (talk) 13:00, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Per Gen. 15:00, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Two nominations for the same person? Well, you edit a lot, and I think that you could be a good rollback We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  15:24, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Yes: Per Bullet and Gen. 15:28, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Per all. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) Per gen. Chao-happy.gif Dont mess wit dah pandahs  Chao-happy.gif
 * 10) You've got potential Fly. One thing first. I'd like if you could evaluate more on why you deserve a promotion. Maybe why you need to Rollback tool, how you could use it, why you want it. Rollback (this goes for all promotions) isn't a title. It's a tool. You should only request Rollback if you need it, people won't think you're a big user. So, if you could write a brief summary of why you deserve rollback, it'd sure help -- <font color="Crimson">Murphyshane - <font color="#00b6ee"> 熱! <font color="#C0C0C0">Don't click here   16:02, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Opposition

 * 1) Wow. You actually just said that you deserve a promotion because you edit a lot. -- Supermorff (talk) 07:05, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Discussion

 * @Supermorff He said he "and he thinks"? -- 07:11, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, he said "and I think", but either way it makes no difference. User right discussions aren't about deserving promotion, which reeks of entitlement. It's about demonstrating that you'll use the rights appropriately when you have them. -- Supermorff (talk) 07:15, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * It does make a difference, because he's making two completely different statements? -- 07:19, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * He really isn't and it makes no difference because he's still using the language that I object to. -- Supermorff (talk) 11:32, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

Conclusion
Yes - Community consensusm according to this nomination, is almost universally supportive of your promotion. As a result, you shall now be granted Rollback rights. Congradulations, Fly! Please use your new tools to the best of your ability. This discussion will be closed shortly. Lloyd the Cat "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  11:28, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Ultrasonic9000 (Rollback)
Ultrasonic9000 (talk): Contributions Edit Count

Ultrasonic has proven himself much more than worthy of a little more responsibility on the wiki. He is an active contributer, and is willing to help the community. I think he'd make a great Rollback. Time Biter "The Rift"  12:05, July 17, 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello. This is Ultrasonic9000 here and I accept this nomination. I LOVE Sonic the Hedgehog; He is my hero and daily inspiration, and I want only to preserve his legacy. With a function as an rollback, I will have more of the power needed to protect and preserve Sonic's universe and everyone's ideals and work on SNN, and I intent, once I master it, to use the responsibility of a rollback to keep SNN and Sonic clean and pure..Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 10:57, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Per poster. Time Biter  "The Rift"  12:05, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) I support as well. He is very active, and corrects users on their mistakes. I don't have a reason to oppose. -- 12:07, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) I support. The Shadow Of Darkness (talk) 13:00, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Per Bullet. 14:29, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Yes, he does a lot of edits, created a lot of pages, and I think that he could be a great rollback. We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  15:25, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Yes: Per Biter 15:29, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Per time. I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  19:15, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) I think Rollback privileges will serve him well. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  05:40, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) Per Gen. 09:06, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Per all. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) Per all above

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Oppose


VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Conclusion
Yes - Community consensus is unanimous in supporting your nomination, Ultrasonic. Therefore, Rollback privileges will now be given to you. Congradulations! This discussion will be removed shortly. Lloyd the Cat "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  11:34, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

SpyroSonic2000 (Rollback)
SpyroSonic2000 (talk): Contributions Edit Count

Recently I have been making a lot of mainspace edits, and a lot of them are undoing bad edits, so I think that the rollback tool would be useful for me. An example of such a time is I saw two vandal edits on the Rouge the Bat page that were made by the same WC. We all have our own   styles we   won't change  15:41, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) You've got the green light from me, Spyro. 15:43, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Yes: You are a great contributor and deserve Rollback 15:45, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Eyyup The Shadow Of Darkness (talk) 15:59, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is no doubt in my mind. I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  19:16, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Yep: You are a very active user and I've seen the great contributions you have done. I think Rollback will be of great use to you. Lightning   the   Hedgehog
 * 2) Per everyone above. -- 21:21, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 22:33, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]]
 * 2) Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  05:41, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Yes. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) I've seen him do well on chat and even edits. I prefer he should be an rollback.Zackery Willson (talk) 17:46, July 20, 2012 (UTC)BlueSpeeder-12:46pm-7/20/12
 * 5) Got my vote. Shadowunleashed13  "I am...none of me..."   23:34, July 21, 2012 (UTC)

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Oppose


VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Conclusion
Yes - Community consensus is clearly in your favor, Spyro. Congradulations, Rollback privileges will now be given to you! This nomination will be closed shortly. Lloyd the Cat "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  11:28, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

ModrenSonic (Chat Moderator)
ModrenSonic (talk): Contributions Edit Count

I believe I am ready to take the job as a moderator since I’m on the chat everyday. I didn’t get enough support last time because I didn’t contribute much. I been contributing lately and reached 1,000 edits and I think I have enough trust from everyone. ☯ModrenSonic  The Ultimate Ninja☯  19:49, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) YES  I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  19:53, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) I believe you're ready for this.  Lightning   the   Hedgehog
 * 3) You've been editing more actively lately, so I don't have a reason to oppose. After this, I think we'll be good on promotions for a long while, as we'd have more than enough of everything already. -- 21:19, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Absolutely per Bullet.  01:43, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) yea[[file:Tailsbye.gif]] Miles Tails Prower8000   Turtles are Awesome:) [[File:BunnieRabbotSonicSpinballCameo.gif]] 22:21, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Per Kyle.  We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  22:23, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) I'm pretty sure you're ready.  -★~wAy PaSt FaSt!~★ »  CRASHband5 19:54, July 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) You behave very well for someone who doesn't have over 2,000 edits. I agree that he's ready.Zackery Willson (talk) 20:04, July 20, 2012 (UTC)BlueSpeeder-3:03pm-7/20/12
 * 9) Sure.  Thunder the Hedgehog  20:22, July 20, 2012 (UTC)

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Oppose


VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Discussion

 * Due to the current amount of Mods now and the ones running I am going to remain neutral. 20:44, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Per Free. 22:09, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Per Free. [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] 05:20, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not really too sure on Modren's abilities just yet, so for now I'll remain neutral. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  05:42, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Per all above. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)

Conclusion
Yes - Consensus is in your favor. While there are neutral voters, there was never a clear opposer. With that said, congratulations! You are now a Chat Moderator. This discussion will be removed shortly. 00:30, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Mariosonic15 (Rollback)
Mariosonic15 (talk): Contributions Edit Count

I nominate myself for Rollback since I have been editing on this wiki for over a half of a year, I've been editing a lot within the past few months, adding pictures, videos and music to articles that needed them, and have helped revert edits made by vandals. '<font color="#green">Mariosonic15  I always race to win! 22:13, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Absolutely. You are an amazing contributor and deserves extra rights. -- 22:15, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) I think you'd be a great rollback. 22:17, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Per those two. Lightning   the  Hedgehog
 * 4) Per all ☯ModrenSonic   The Ultimate Ninja☯  22:30, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Per mod. I like Hatsune Miku.   Problem?  22:35, July 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Yeah! You'd be a great Rollback! [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] 05:16, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  05:43, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Go for it. 09:08, July 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) I have no objections. 19:48, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Yes. His  World  01:31, July 20, 2012 (UTC)

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Oppose

 * 1) I'm sorry, who are you again? Ms, you're a good user and all, but you just don't seem active enough to get more rights. -CariconCommander (talk) 20:08, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

VOTING IS NOW CLOSED

Discussion

 * Adding pictures, videos and music is completely irrelevant to rollback. It's also irrelevant to admin, chat mod and bureaucrat, for that matter. -- Supermorff (talk) 19:20, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you provide examples of you reverting edits? -- 20:55, July 19, 2012 (UTC)

Conclusion
Yes - It seems most people are in agreement that you'd make a good Rollback, Mariosonic. As such, Rollback privileges will now be bestowed upon you. Congradulations! This nomination will be closed shortly. Lloyd the Cat "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  11:28, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Jet50 (Rollback)
Jet50 (talk): Contributions Edit Count

Now if a bunch of you start saying "NO" then I understand because I've been inactive for a while now. But the thing is, before I left the SNN, undoing bad edits was one of my SNN hobbies, but sometimes I felt that regular undoing is hard to use and sort of messed up, so I stopped doing it. But I want to become a Rollback so I can easily undo vandalism, false information, and spam, and fan charcter information in mainspace. Also, I've been here for two years, and I understand the rules. -- Mr.T 20:27, July 19, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * No, you have a problem with attitude, taking breaks, you hardly ever edit in the mainspace, let alone reverting edits, etc. -- 20:28, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) *Not to mention you did not set this up correctly originally. -- 20:29, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) No: Per Bullet 20:31, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) No, per Kyle. We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  20:32, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) You've still got red links to irrelevant pages in your signature. Could you please take them out? -- Supermorff (talk) 20:33, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Per Bullet. Also, you'd need to be much more active for me to even consider supporting.  Myself  <font color="Black">123  20:35, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Per Bullet, you just got back and you're already requesting rollback? 20:50, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Per bullet-dude, sorry man.<ul class="wikia-menu-button" style="list-style: none; margin:0px"><li style="margin-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">[ Rhythm Theif] <ul style="list-style: none; border-radius:4px; border-top-right-radius: 1px; border-top-left-radius: 1px; margin:0px"><li>[ Want me to steal sumin?]</li><li> </li></ul></li></ul>22:53, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Per Kyle. [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] Will   Rose  [[File:Will Life Icon.png]] 22:56, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) No. Straight away, no. You have low edits, attitude problems and are for the most part inactive on SNN -- <font color="Crimson">Murphyshane - <font color="#00b6ee"> 熱! <font color="#C0C0C0">Don't click here   23:14, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Per everyong else, especially Bullet. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  23:48, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) So upon immediate return you've requested Rollback rights? It's clearly not that simple Jet, you must be an active contributor, and by contributing we want you to edit actual pages as opposed to making continuous blog posts. Plus, I don't think there has been much improvement over your past attitude unless I see some evidence of it. You have a big road ahead of you in order to gain Rollback rights. 23:55, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) Per all. And seriously, your arch-enemy is an admin? His  World  00:43, July 20, 2012 (UTC)

Supermorff (bureaucrat demotion)
Supermorff (talk): Contributions Edit Count

To be very clear here: I don't actually want to be demoted. Far from it. I enjoy the work I do here and I want to keep doing it. However, adminship on this wiki tends to be adminship for life, which seems wrong somehow. I have been the site's only bureaucrat for such a long time that it really wasn't possible to step down because I was the only one capable of doing bureaucrat things. But change is the nature of wikis. We now have a second active bureaucrat, and may have a third in short order, and maybe people are sick and tired of having me around. And as I am the only person capable of demoting myself, I thought I should gauge the appetite for my doing so. I will demote myself if consensus swings that way; I hope it doesn't. I also encourage people to be honest&mdash;and to say what you think I should work to improve&mdash;and I promise I will not take any votes against me personally. -- Supermorff (talk) 19:47, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) As poster (bizarrely). -- Supermorff (talk) 19:47, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) You are a great 'crat, and you don't need to be demoted. However, if you no longer want to be a 'crat, that's your choice, and don't let me stop you. Time Biter  "The Rift"  20:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) I don't think you should be demoted. You haven't done anything wrong. -- 20:16, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, you're a great crat, and I think you deserve that rank, and you're the most experienced crat, if not overall user, who's active here. We all  have our own   styles we   won't change  20:27, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) If you honestly feel as though you want to be demoted, I'm certainly not one wanting to be responsible for stopping you. However, I am far from "sick" of you being one of our Bureaucrats on this wikipedia, you've been one of our most important members, always there to take on any duties when you've been needed. I say the more the merrier in this case, so I believe you should hold your title as a 'Crat.  21:00, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) To be quite honest, I don't think a demotion is necessary. If you feel you need a break, then by all means, take a break. Go on vacation for a while, or something. You need not let go of your bureaucrat rights on those grounds. Now, if you feel you've done something wrong here or you have some other reason for a demotion, that's another story, though I might find reasons to oppose demotion on those grounds, as well. You're good at what you do, and that's good enough for me.-- 10:51, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) I oppose, per everyone else. You've also been a source of inspiration for me, so I'd really be lying if I said that I was "sick and tired of [you] being around". Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  11:02, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

 * This is one of those difficult situations I've seen before. As much as I want to Oppose, I want to Support. So your reasoning for requesting a demotion for yourself is because you need a break from the duties of Bureaucrat? That's what I'm picking up from this, and if that's the only reason I'll gladly support. You've worked hard here on the wiki, and I think you should get a break because you very well deserve one. If there's another reason for this that I'm not picking up, I can't support until I fully understand. --AdmiralLevi.Signiture_B.gifAdmiralLevi._Salute_B.gif 19:59, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Apparently I wasn't clear enough. My reasoning for requesting... well, not requesting, but suggesting a demotion for myself is because I feel that other people should have a chance to have a say. I don't want a break and I don't want a demotion, but I feel I've been around too long without the community having some choice as to whether I stay in post. And, honestly, I think if anyone else nominated me they'd quickly find themselves unwelcome. So have your say and be honest about whether you want me to be a bureaucrat. I still want me to be a bureaucrat, and that's how I voted. -- Supermorff (talk) 20:14, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Supermorff, there's one thing that I'd like to mention about the other bureaucrats. They almost never get to do their job. Correct me if I'm wrong, but on this page here, it seems you're always the one who promotes a user and closes the nomination (not critisising, just highlighting). The other bureaucrats don't have alot of user of their power. Some bureaucrats like Genesjs have gotten to use their powers for demotion as I've seen but alot of the time, you are the one who manages use rights so, if you ever lost your rights, Genesjs would have to take your place. We may also need another bureaucrat on the wiki if you choose to drop your duties. Don't get me wrong, what ever you want, I'll follow behind it 100%. -- <font color="Crimson">Murphyshane - <font color="#00b6ee"> 熱! <font color="#C0C0C0">Don't click here   20:24, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * I haven't been a Crat for very long Murphy, and I have done more on the RfA page besides making a few demotions (and I plan on doing more, since more nominations are about to come to a close). Not trying to start an argument, I just wanted to point that out. Lloyd the Cat  "I don't die. I just go on adventures."  11:06, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Per Lev, I'm gonna wait a little longer before i cast my vote -- <font color="Crimson">Murphyshane - <font color="#00b6ee"> 熱! <font color="#C0C0C0">Don't click here   20:02, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm neutral, per Admiral Lev. The Shadow Of Darkness (talk) 20:05, July 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Per Admiral; if you truly want to be relived of your duties, then I will support. 20:07, July 13, 2012 (UTC)