Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20160829051027/@comment-477304-20160903182837

Based on what I've seen, that is definitely not true. I see at least one person contributing to site discussions and if people don't, reach out to them.

As for the Chaos Boost example, you never needed consensus for that. If literally no one replied, just do it.

How do you think your discussions with Ultra would go under this new proposal? I don't see it being any better. And yes, we can reduce the amount of users needed for consensus, this would be the simpler solution and I've yet to see anyone explain to me why it wouldn't work.