Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26873653-20160723035910/@comment-27370337-20160802062102

Mystic Monkey wrote:

Darnell Putman wrote:

Mystic Monkey wrote:

Megalodon Commando wrote:

Mystic Monkey wrote:

Megalodon Commando wrote:

Mystic Monkey wrote:

Megalodon Commando wrote:

Mystic Monkey wrote: If he did I don't see the harm in it. Heck if he sneaked in some Archie characters shouldn't mind much. Sonic Spinball did it. Still would make me geek out regardless. As long as it's regarded as a non-canon cameo then I'm alright by it. isn't the Post-SGW reality meant to take on relations towards the games? Yes but it isn't THE games lore. Archie still have liberties and their own stories they can do for the comic. Granted Sega tightened their limits after Penders fiasco. I see. But it's best If the Archie characters stay in their own Continuity as you say. Yes I believe so. If it turns out the Archie comics and the games stories are one in the same canon, it will become very confusing and lots of questions. If that's the case, maybe, we'll finally get an explanation on how the story of each Sonic game (1991-2016 present) blow everything wide open. I prefer the comics lore and the games lore stay seperate. Post-SGW can try to pass itself as the games but it's simply not. and it cannot excuse over hudnreds of past issues they had before the Super Genesis Wave. Archie can't simply sweep all those years of printed and licenced work under the rug. Maybe. I could be wrong about this, but sometimes when the lore can become so crowded that you can't tell an original story as much. Although they're cases where games and Archie Comics considered to be seperate continuties, even if they share something similar.