Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20160908202646/@comment-24014422-20160910104448

PecolaFromScratch wrote: Luma.dash wrote: In courtesy to Ultra's invite, below are my suggestions: And in the end, I don't know why you stepped down that fast without testing the idea first, because that can make our suggestions worthless if others pay attention to what happened now. It is like we are rushing things. Would a % of upvote/down votes be a good idea? or is that a horible way to run a wiki... or maybe after a number of votes the % would take effect? I'm afraid I don't understand your response.
 * Currently, since 7 or a little more users are mostly participating in votes for user rights. We make all the needed votes for bureaucracy, adminships and moderators 7. Because most of our bureaucrats and admin except for Myself123 Ultra and Blue aren't participating in such votes. So more than 7 votes, like 10 for example, may not be reached or is impossible without (like Bullet said) begging some users in discord to vote, and if you disagree with giving them the right, every opposition takes one support. Take this for example to why I propose such idea.
 * For discussions about mainspace, actually rare cares about them. As I see many discussions revolving about such objectives on other wikis get the interest of all the users with rights. So it is not our fault if we make a discussion, but no one participates. Then he/she charges at us afterward whenever they want. Actually here, there is no way other than; either we (content moderators, admins and crats) pay more attention to the discussion and involve, or we step aside and lets the users do their ideas whatever are. It is either we ignore or discuss.
 * User rights must evolve naturally in conjunction with other users support. I mean, it is a natural thing that, for example, the User:Ultrasonic9000 or Bluespeeder gains bureaucrat rights because of his outstanding edits at the end, or moderators evolve into admins later and so on. We mustn't refuse every evolvement because we fear of the outcome. Things must change, users who cannot continue with the wiki must have their rights lapsed, or at least get a little level down. Because if a majority of bureaucrats/admin are active for day by a month or two, even if they did amazing job before, cannot last forever. It maybe hard to some people even I, if it happens to us, but we must go with no matter how it turns.