Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20140627203708/@comment-20015702-20140628152545

BlueSpeeder wrote: Alright, I came to a decision. Please note of this.

Since most of us seem to agree with the first rules, albeit censoring should be allowed and religion and politics can be talked about to an extent, the underedit rule is where I realized the mistake. After arguments of chat have had me come to an epiphany, I've found out a slightly alternate (if that's the right word to use, correct me if I'm wrong); we can simply ban users who are irresponsible and those who have proceeded a certain amount of kicks/bans.

Now yes, we do do something like this; if a user gets kicked, then kicked again, they are most likely blocked for a certain time period. If they are blocked again, it's a longer time length. But, let's say the user gets blocked, hmm, three times. Three(?) blocks should be the limit to when a user can be on the chat until they are banned forever. Does this sound fair or reasonable? Keeping a ban limit seems too fixed, since people who get banned are banned very variably. It all really depends on what the person is doing and how early should that user get banned, so having a limit as a rule would seem unfair. To me, that is.