Thread:GraveEclipse567/@comment-1392727-20160112182601/@comment-1392727-20160115101434

No attacks here, just questions. I knew I would be questioned for not 'assuming good faith' but this rule doesn't mean I am not allowed to express my doubts. Didn't call you a cheater, didn't say you broke the rules. If I thought you did, I would call you one and demand you demoted. But I don't think you cheated onpurpose, so I just asked questions as to why you agreed to do something like this. Seriously... I would report you if I was sure but I only used four days just asking questions. But I knew I was starting to go far... really sorry...

You and Grave were not answering properly. First it looked like you two thought it ended on time, then it looked like you didn't know, then you looked like you closed it early onpurpose because Blue let you. You see, the story is coming out different to my understanding.

But there's one thing that Blue said that makes this clear. He let Grave closed the nomination early because he would have been busy on the 10th. This was not a good decision at all. Grave is not the only bureaucrat here. Could have left it to someone else. I know you three understand that this is a mistake, but it looks like you have not yet realized that this could have been done instead. The consensus on the nomination was divided, a day can make a difference. Like you said, the votes increased so people were still voting.

I won't bother you about this anymore. I sincerely apologize for offending anyone. I knew this was going to happen but I still went for it. I'm really, really sorry.