Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20160829051027/@comment-24014422-20160903184955

Myself 123 wrote: Based on what I've seen, that is definitely not true. I see at least one person contributing to site discussions and if people don't, reach out to them.

As for the Chaos Boost example, you never needed consensus for that. If literally no one replied, just do it.

How do you think your discussions with Ultra would go under this new proposal? I don't see it being any better. And yes, we can reduce the amount of users needed for consensus, this would be the simpler solution and I've yet to see anyone explain to me why it wouldn't work.

Because you don't remember how much edit warring happened to when I requested such change in the Chaos Boost. Also, those who reply at site discussions, do not want want to interract with mainspace, I know this because %95 of users replying at mainspace discussions are us (You, Ultra, and other content moderators including me, no on else), and the ones that bothered moved out of the wiki. Furthermore, we cannot go on everyone's message wall, begging them for replies, as they are usually highlighted.

But for discussions with Ultra, I just give that an example for how most users do not bother themselves on such conflicts, as I've seen many users before 2013 caring about pages a lot more than now, evidenced in talk pages.

Though I've no objection on reducing the number of users for user rights, but doesn't that make rights invaluable or that we are like giving rights easily.