User talk:Pkstarstorm1up

Hi, welcome to Sonic News Network! Thanks for your edit to the Bokkun page. Before editing, you might like to check out our Community Portal, and please read our rules. In particular, we have strict guidelines over the inclusion of fan material (characters, stories, etc.). If you want to edit fan material, then we suggest you have a look at the Sonic Fanon Wiki instead, which is a more appropriate location. Other than that, we hope that you will feel welcome here, and enjoy your stay! If you have any questions, leave a message on my talk page, and I will get back to you as soon as I possibly can! -- Sonictoast (Talk) 00:05, July 31, 2010

Attention, new user. Your contributions to the Bokkun article are nothing more than speculation. He has not been confirmed to be a animal or a chao. If he has been, could you perhaps link me to the source? Thank you. -- 00:15, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

I never said I hate Chris Thorndyke, I have no idea why you think I do.  Myself  123  15:46, August 5, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, so you hate me for being logical, now do you? 03:38, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Easy, Sonic X describes then as parellel universes, meaning that there is a G.U.N in Sonic's world, and a G.U.N in Chris's world.

I never said that I hate you, I said that you can annoy me. and how are you being logical? and what the heck are you doing reading my talk page!? What am I suddenly a big intrest to you!? I thought moderators only watched the articles round the clock not the user pages! The Mods have no reason to snoop around the user page when a change to it is made by the user who created it.

We have all the reason in the world. 04:00, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

No you don't because it doesn't concern the Sonic series itself! It is based on my on opinions and thoughts and I don't want some SonicxSally fanbrat reading it!

'Fanbrat'? FANBRAT?! It's called being INTELLEGENT! Ask anyone here about what I'm saying and they'll agree with me! 04:06, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Only other Fanbrats.

==  Shelly   the  Hedgehog  I'm not a monkey!  ==

Firstly, you may NOT be aggressive/rude to other users here. Secondly, Sonally is canon within the Archie comic universe. -- Shelly   the  Hedgehog  I'm not a monkey! 04:10, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

^See? 04:10, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Um Admiral. Why did you delete that? That was a simple question that I feel I have the right to ask. and if this is my personal talk page wouldn't that mean anything that I put shouldn't be deleted by someone else?

No. It doesn't. U have no right to remove another user's message without their perrmission. Sonic &amp; Scrab  Master   Kaze no Kizu!  04:24, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

What? Then wouldn't that mean that he can't remove one of messages without my permission? because he did a few mins ago.

I didn't see it. Also, both of you, STOP! Stop this argument, now! Sonic &amp; Scrab  Master   Kaze no Kizu!  04:29, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Okay I'll stop. But may I at least know what article I'm supposed to have vandalised? I is it alright if you please remove everything off my talk page except for where I'm talking about my favorite characters.

To Admiral Leviathan. I'm sorry that we can't agree, but I am willing to drop this whole matter in that I like SonicxAmy better and you like SonicxSally better. Can we please let bygons be bygons and forget any of this ever happened?

I don't know how this all started. And this talk page will stay a it is. Sonic &amp; Scrab  Master   Kaze no Kizu!  04:42, August 28, 2010 (UTC) Is there any way that I can make up for what I did and you may someday remove the vandalising user thing, or am I just stuck with that forever?

Oops. he he. I didn't realise that my fav chacters are on my profile page not my talk page. silly me. :D

Hi
Never expected you to return. I remember the big debate we all had on Sonally and Sonamy. It's over now, so I don't want to go on about it. Anyways, welcome back. Want to be friends? Sacorguy79: I'll have to give myself a 11:54, November 12, 2010 (UTC)Sacorguy79

Sure! Only problem is that I don't know how to add friends on wikis.

Actually, there sin't such a thing as "adding". If a person accepts a friend request, you're friends. That's all there is to it! Sacorguy79: I'll have to give myself a 11:48, November 14, 2010 (UTC)Sacorguy79

I need some help! I've noticed that for the past few weeks or so someone deleted what Eggman's role in Sonic 06 was! Even if someone doesn't like the game it doesn't give them the right to delete the details of it.

I've tried asking some moderators but I get the feeling that they are still holding a grudge from the SonicxAmy vs. SonicxSally debate I had with them. Do you think you could help get them to put this information back on the article? Because this is definitly vandalism!

hi
Hello. I'm SonAmy too. Friends? sure, but who is this?

Oh sorry, I forgot to put in my sig above^ Okay thanks!:D Knuckleschaotix 15:08, February 1, 2011 (UTC) Sounds great!Knuckleschaotix 02:46, February 2, 2011 (UTC)

If you know for a fact that this is true, then prove it. Any proof whatsoever will instantly cause your credibility to go up. Instead, you start an edit war, simply insisting that you're right. Based on what's transpired on your own talk page, though, I'd say we're better off without you and your attitude.

-SalaComMander 21:04, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

First off I would like to apologize for my recent behavior here on Sonic News Network, I've been going through alot of things in my life and this whole who saved Sally from dying thing just made me explode. See the thing is, my dad passed away not to long ago from lung cancer, and I've had to step up my game around the house, at school and in public. My mom is having to learn how to support me her and our dogs and she has to learn how to work at her new job. School has been really rough for me because some new kids have been very nasty about what has been going on, plus one of my Teachers likes to poke fun at my life. Again I am really sorry for the trouble I have caused and I hope that I can have a fresh start on this. sincerly pkstarstorm1up.

Sorry. Can't. First, I don't know myself. Second, I'm kn my monthly vacation. Sonic &amp; Scrab  Master   Just call me Deepthroat  20:52, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Well do you think Shelly would know how to? She is the head moderator right? If so the next time you contact her could you ask her for me?

Myself 123
Can you please stop adding false information to the Sonic X page.  Myself  123  22:36, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

User:Pkstarstorm1up I'm not adding false information, I'm just adding what has already been proven.

Has it?  Myself  123  22:41, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, in the Japanese and French versions of Sonic X He tells Amy that he loves her, plus he confesses his feelings for Amy in Sonic Chronicles the Dark Brotherhood. It's also hinted that Sonic will go on a date with Amy in The Xbox 360/Ps3 versions of Sonic Unleashed and he is on a date with her in Sonic and the Black Knight. I think it's safe to say that it's pretty obvious that Sonic the Hedgehog loves Amy Rose in the Games/Sonic X continuity.

The Sonic Chronicles and and Unleashed thing is completely optional and the player's choice. We don't know why Sonic is on a date in SatBK, she could've twisted his arm, it clearly wasn't important to him because he forgot (I'm not sure why you're mentioning this though, as it has nothing to do with Sonic X). Finally, I've heard that Sonic says something else in Japanese dub, and if it was true, why did Amy try and make Sonic fall in love with her in a later episode?  Myself  123  22:53, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Optional yes, but it's clearly the choice that Sonic Team considers canon. They have stated SonAmy is canon in an interview in a magazine before, don't ask for a link because I don't know how to provide links so please look it up on your own. Look up Segas Master Tweets theater on youtube and you will see them confirm SonAmy being canon. The choices to say no in Chronicles is only there for fans who hate SonAmy and don't want a couple forced down there throats (A lesson Archie sure could learn when it comes to SonSally) He loves her but doesn't like being all touchy feely like she does and she wants him to be more touchy feely. He didn't forget he was summened into King Arthurs storbook by Merlina remember? That second Chili Dog was for Amy on thier date.

Was that second chilli dog for the date? How do you know that the "no" choices were simply made for SonAmy haters? How do you know that they're not the right choices and that the "yes" choices were simply made for SonAmy fans? The Master Tweet Theatre doesn't say that Sonic loves Amy, it says that we will find out if he dose later this year, maybe he dose love her, maybe he doesn't, some may claim that they know but they don't, not really. Anyway, all this is moot, I was talking about Sonic X, not the games.  Myself  123  23:47, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Because Sonic Team wouldn't toy around with thier most beloved couple like that. They wouldn't hint at it like that and wink at the viewers if it wasn't canon. Ah but Sonic X was made by Sonic Team and Sonic Project therefore it is the same continuity as the games. Anything that happens differently in Sonic X then it did in the games is what Sonic Team decided they wanted to be the canon version.

What couple? There is no couple. Maybe there might be (MIGHT be) one in the not-to-distant future, but their isn't one now, all you're basing this on are player choices and one date that didn't even happen. All right then, so because Sonic X is produced by Sonic Team it's canon to the games? O.k o.k. Did you know that Knuckles can fly freely? Or that Sonic's world is spilt into two parts, the lower, main land being a destroyed city where Robotnik built his Robotropolis? And the second part is made up of several landmasses floating in the sky and is ruled the president who has half cat daughter called Sarah? It's all true.  Myself  123  00:06, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Look you have your views and I have mine.

Opinions are fine, I personally don't believe in SonAmy, but I didn't write what I wrote or do what I did because of that opinion, there's not enough proof that SonAmy exists, so it shouldn't be treated like it dose. As for the whole Sonic X canon thing, I was trying to make a point that I thought you would pursue but you didn't. the fact that Sonic X is produced by Sonic Team doesn't prove it's canon to the games as Sonic Team also produced Sonic the Hedgehog: The Movie, if Sonic X is canon because it was produced by Sonic Team then surely so is this is too, but if you've ever seen the movie, you'll know it's vastly different from the games and Sonic X.  Myself  123  00:32, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

The movie wasn't made by Sonic Team, it was only made by Sonic Project. Sonic Team created Sonic X and Chris, Cosmo, Danny, and several other characters therefore any romance that happens in Sonic X means that it's what they like and want. Plus Shadow gets a power up by removing his Inhibtor Rings which he first does in Sonic X suggesting a linked canon. Cosmo is still regenerating into her normal form in Sonic Chronicles heavily implying a linked canon. Well I must say at least we are able to keep this converation respectful of the other person, something many other moderators here have a hard time with.

The Sonic movie was produced by Sonic Team as well as Yuji Naka, look here at 5:15. There's no proof that that's Cosmo in that pot, it's most likley just a reference (along with Swatbots and Roboticization).  Myself  123  02:54, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Robotization? There isn't any Robotization in Sonic Chronicles. and yes since Cosmo is actually a living being she counts more as proof then the Swat bots do. Yes, but they didn't create any of the characters in that one so it is ruled out.

Yes there is Robotization in it. There's still no proof that that's Cosmo in the pot, it's never mentioned or dwelled upon. More to the point, if it is Cosmo in that pot, and Sonic X and the games are one in the same, then how come Sonic and co are all back on earth?  Myself  123  23:24, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

I haven't seen a single line of text that talks about Roboticization, and they aren't back on Earth, the word Earth was never used in the game or in any other game.

Plus some more proof is that in Shadow the Hedgehog, Shadow was told that he was created to save the humans but not any Mobians, since thier are no Mobians on Earth that heavily implies a linked continuity between the Games and Sonic X.

I just checked and what they meant by Roboticization there was just that Eggman was trapping animals into living batteries as robots again, not actually changing thier bodies into metal.

Check the link, and read all of it. By your logic they must be on earth because the world is populated with humans and most importantly, G.U.N. Mobius doesn't exist therefore mobians do not exist, anthropomorphic animals such as Sonic have never been refereed to by any name.  Myself  123  14:24, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Let's just agree to disagree.

I guess I and the rest of this Wiki have failed you then.  Myself  123  18:59, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Fail me? How could you fail me when I'm the one who is right?

No because there are more humans then just Eggman on Sonic's planet in Sonic X, you just don't see them because they hardly spend any time on it. Mobians are just the default name of thier species just as Mobius is the default name for thier planet. Sonic X was all Sonic Teams ideas so it's clear that any changes they made to the series makes it canon within the games. The reason Shadow is said to have been created to save the humans is because he was created on Chris's planet aka Earth then after the events of Shadow the Hedhehog he wound up on Mobius and lives there along with the rest of the cast. The Mobius of the Games/Sonic X continuity is a different planet with the same name as the Mobius in the comics.

Do you have any proof that humans exist in Sonic's world? I know humans exist on other planets in Sonic's universe, but that doesn't mean they exist on Sonic's planet. Again, the planet Mobius didn't really exist in the games, according to Japanese continuity, Sonic has always lived on Earth. As I mentioned before, the Sonic the Hedgehog Movie was also produced by Sonic Team, and that was vastly different from the games. Even if there were humand on Sonic's planet, that still doesn't explain why G.U.N exist in Sonic's world.  Myself  123  09:51, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Eggman knew what humans were so that must mean that he's been in contact with other humans before. The manuals actually only said Sonic's World, not Earth itself so since the games and Sonic X are a linked continuity just as SatAM and Archie comics are a linked continuity it isn't Earth that he lives on, therefore I use Mobius as the default name since the actual name of the planet has never been stated. Yes but Eggman is to different in that to be the same Eggman while in Sonic X every characters personalities are exactly the same as in the games. Also in Sonic Adventure DX they added Cream into the game to signify that the Sonic X version is canon because Cream plays a role in that one. They also showed that Chris is canon in the games as well since they added him on a poster board in one of the games where he plays a major role in Sonic X in. All of this hints and clues are proof that The Games/Sonic X are the same Continuity just as SatAM/Archie comics are the same continuity.

Sonic dose live on Earth, his birthplace has even been stated to be Christmas Island, a real world location. Is Eggman too different in Sonic OVA? He wore the exact same clothes he did in the games, and he is portrayed as an arrogant, egotistical mastermind, that sounds like Robotnik to me. They didn't add Cream in SA: DX because she was in Sonic X, it was just a cameo to promote the new character, Posters of Chris and Sonic X were put in to promote Sonic X (besides, these images only appear in the extra, mission mode).  Myself  123  17:47, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S Sonic X Eggman knows about humans because he did live on Earth before being sent to Sonic's world at an unknown time, otherwise he wouldn't have known and respected his grandfather.

Yeah a real world location name, so? That doesn't mean it's Earth, it's just a location on a different planet that has the same name as a real world location. and no Eggman didn't know that he was born on Earth he was quite suprised when he found out that he was so he had to have been in infant when he was sent to Mobius, so he couldn't of known about his granfather that way, it is left up to speculation about how he knew his grandfather. and if he was the only Human on Sonic's world then he would have been very shocked when he was sent to Chris's planet (which he wasn't.) I know that there are a few inconsistances in my theory but there are more inconsistancys in your theory therefore my theory is more valid.

and yeah Eggman is very different in the Sonic OVA, he is infatuated with Princess Sara Freedom while in the Games and Sonic X he has never been shown to have a crush on anyone.

We don't when Eggman arrived on Chris' world, he could've been a teenager when it happened and didn't recognise it when he returned (Eggman's middle-aged and a lot can happen in 20-30 years, plus he may a lived in a different location). Have you ever noticed how confused and scared Sonic is when he first appears in Chris' world? He doesn't look confused just because he's in a new location, he seems to be puzzled by cars as if he's never seen one before and when some of humans shout out to him, Sonic says "So they can talk" suggesting he's not used to them. Later on in the same episode, he ponders if the he's been sent to a different time as the stars and the moon look different, suggesting the idea of a parallel world hadn't even crossed Sonic's mind. Just because OVA Eggman is attracted to Sarah and Sonic X Eggman has never shown any affection to any females doesn't mean they have completely different personalities, it just means that there's no-one who appeals to him.  Myself  123  01:24, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Actually Sonic doesn't say that in the official translation, you must be watching some of those free translations. Sonic isn't freaked out because there are cars there, he's freaked out because he almost got hit by one. Plus he never says the stars are different in the Japanese dub which is the canonically correct version. Uh yes it does, he bows to Saras every whim, something he never did For Princess Elise who by the way is alot more beautiful the Sara is.

Beisides this all a mute point, Sonic X and all of it's characters and ideas were made by Sonic Team which makes it there ideal version of the Sonic canon therefore if Sonic love Amy in Sonic X then he loves Amy in the games as well. Even if it wasn't the same continuity (even though it is) since it is proven official in an anime they made then that would mean that it is official in the games as well since they have made them as well.

Sorry, I meant to say the stars and moon look similar, and I was watching the official dub, so he dose say that. Elise being prettier that Sarah is just a matter of opinion, besides one slight difference doesn't make him completely different. As I've said before, just because it was produced by Sonic Team doesn't mean it's their ideal canon, Sonic OVA was produced by Sonic Team too. And if Sonic did say he loves Amy, that still doesn't explain why she tried to make Sonic fall in love with her in a later episode.  Myself  <font color="Black">123  09:30, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

No he doesn't. The Dub is not considered the canon version of Sonic X.  The Japanese version of Sonic X is the canon version. Yes it does, it shows it's not the same Eggman. and yes it does make it thier ideal canon because unlike Sonic OVA they created dozens of characters something they did not do for Sonic OVA. I've already told you why, he loves her but he doesn't like being all clingy which she wishes he was, that's why she wanted the potion so that way he would be all touchy feely like she wants.

One thing like that dose not make them completely different, it doesn't matter anyway because both OVA Eggman and Sonic X Eggman were created by Sonic Team, so it's what they wanted. As best to my knowledge, it's a love potion, not a "touchy feely" potion. Sonic X isn't canon to the games because it causes a large number of inconsistencies such the presence of G.U.N (in particular, the G.U.N Commander) in games that, according to your logic, happen after the events of the final series, the lack of Chris Thorndyke, who's supposed to be a close friend of Sonic's and the huge differences in the Sonic Battle "adaptation"?  Myself  <font color="Black">123  01:19, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

It's the same thing since he admitted he loves her and it's pretty obvious that he does. and yes Sonic X is canon withing the games because those aren't inconsistanceies, Sonic Team just decided to retcon the games versions and make the Sonic X version the canon version because they are better that way and since Chris is Sonic Best Friend.

Is it obvious? I don't recall seeing Sonic showing much affection to Amy after that one episode and he's shown even less in the games. The only thing we can do is wait and see. If it is a retcon, that still doesn't explain why G.U.N is in Sonic Chronicles, when G.U.N exist in "Chris' world" and SC is set on "Sonic's World".  Myself  <font color="Black">123  15:42, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Yes it is, he is incredibly flustered and attracted to her when she wears that ballroom gown in season 3, plus he gets extreamly upset when she is in danger and will do anything to keep her safe. That's not the same G.U.N, it's the G.U.N of Sonic's world.

Then how come the same person is running both of them?  Myself  <font color="Black">123  16:41, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

It's not the same person, he has different color disigns.

There's not much difference in colour.  Myself  <font color="Black">123  14:50, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah but there is a noticible difference therefore he is a different commander.

Is there? the only differences I can see is a lighter skin colour and a lack of heterochromia (but, to my knowledge, not many NPCs are shown with an eye colour). If a slight redesign like that means that he's a different character, dose that mean that the Sonic seen in the early games is a completely different character to the one seen in the later games?  Myself  <font color="Black">123  18:08, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

No because that is different, Sonic is a main character so that rule doesn't apply, that would be like saying that There are 6 different Sallys. Blond Hair Orange Fur, Black Hair Pink Fur, Brown Hair Pink Fur, Red Hair Brown Fur with no pupils or vest, Red Rair Brown Fur with pupils and a vest, and Long Red Hair Brown Fur with pupils and a vest.

No, the point stands, just because a character has a slight redesign doesn't mean it's a completely different character.  Myself  <font color="Black">123  18:44, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Whatever, I have more evidence to support my theory then you have to support yours so I'm just going to drop this.

No you don't, all you're going on is the fact that Sonic team produced Sonic X, cameos and stuff you've made up that isn't backed up by anything. But, if you still believe that Sonic X is canon to the games, then I give up, you can believe it if you want, but this is a Sonic wiki, and as a wiki we have give factual information to the people who come here, so I must ask you to keep you're theory out of mainspace.  Myself  <font color="Black">123  19:14, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

This is the last I'll discuss on this, you haven't given any factual information either so it really isn't fact that SonAmy and Sonic X aren't canon.

Hello
I hear you want Silver and Blaze back in the game. So are you saying that Sonic 06 was good? The gameplay was terrible. We should be able to play as Knuckles, Tails, Amy, and Shadow and Rouge, but that's about it! Gameplay is better than the story, would you like it if the gameplay and levels of a game were terrible but the story was good? Sounds like it. Sorry if I may have offended your opinion, but that's what I think.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 21:24, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

No the gameplay of Sonic 06 was not terrible, it was almost exactly like the gameplay in Sonic Adventure was, it was the camera and the load times that drag the game down but otherwise it is the equvilant of Sonic Adventure 3.

It's no fun to play a game with good gameplay if it has a sorry excuse for a story because it will get boring then. Sonic Colors may have had very fun gameplay but the story is what stops me from playing it alot like I do with Sonic Adventure and Sonic 06. No matter how great the gameplay is the story is always supposed to be a bit better.

Sonic 06 had terrible gameplay and got a 3.5/10 and has the WORST average rating out of any Sonic game ever. Therefore it is the worst. Sonic Colors has the 5th average rating out of the console main games.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 01:45, April 11, 2011 (UTC)

Sonic 06 did not have a terrible gameplay! The gameplay is exactly like Adventure's gameplay is so your basically saying that Adventure had bad gameplay. Again that's only because the general reviewers are biased against Sonic and besides just because they don't like it doesn't make it bad. It is not the worst and there have been plenty others with worse ratings. Plus I'm allowed to have my own opinion so I don't appriciate you trying to decide what I can or can't like.

In my first comment I said "Sorry if I may have offended your opinion" because I knew something like this would happen. Again I apologize.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 01:58, April 11, 2011 (UTC)

Do not add that info the Tails' Workshop page again until it is resolved what should be there. If you try it will result in a block, for you have been warned many times. Thank You.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 19:13, April 11, 2011 (UTC)

and um this is the first time I've been warned about this.

Pkstarstorm1up 19:20, April 14, 2011 (UTC)== umm ==

may i ask why you added that "any changes in the Adventure Arks are what is canon and is the same continuity as the one in the games" when it is not true, it could be considered vandalism

Ediskrad327 00:03, April 12, 2011 (UTC) I added it because it is true, people just don't want to believe that it's true because they don't like Chris.

Do not add random pages without actually knowing the name of the article and without providing good info. Thanks. This is the last time you have been warned okay?

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 23:30, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Wait what? Last time I've been warned? Um parden me but I haven't done anything wrong. I added an article about two characters that didn't have an article, what's wrong about that? T

Because the page is useless and the characters have no name, and there is near to non info about them. It is just like creating a page called "Character in the crowd" they have no name, and have no info. Would you create an article called "character in the crowd?" No. It is the same thing. Understood?

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 23:40, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Um okay but I don't think that warrents a threat of being banned.

I know but you have been warned many times for other things, keep it up and it will be a perma-ban.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 23:44, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

What other things? It your referring to that issue I had with Admiral Leviathan that was over 9 months ago, that hardly counts as something against me in the here and know don't you think?

No. Time changes nothing. The admins set it up that way. I don't make the rules, I follow and enforce them.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 23:49, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Okay well could you maybe please give me some tips on what I'm doing that is so bad? Because I don't think creating an article is vadalising.

Yes it is. Read my above comment about Character in the crowd thing. That is what you are doing right now creating an article just like that.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 23:53, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Well I didn't know that that was bad so does that still count as vanalising since I thought that since they were his adoptive parents that they were a little signifigant. I wouldn't do something stupid like add a character in a croud unless it is an actual character who makes a cameo appearence.

Well that is what you are doing. It is called spamming.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 23:59, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Out of curiousity, how is it spamming if I only created the article once and didn 't know that it was wrong?

Because the page itself is a spam, making you a spammer, making that spamming.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 00:12, April 13, 2011 (UTC)

it doesn't matter whatpeople think of Chris, it is not true, there are many elements in the anime that directly contradict the game canon and cannot be the same continuity starting whith the whole sonic being from amother world plot element and having Chris, decoe, bocoe on the Ark in the SA2 adaptation

Ediskrad327 16:35, April 13, 2011 (UTC)

Sonic Team created the anime and many of it's characters thus any changes in the anime are the canon version.

Plus The Archie comics have conflicting stories with SatAM and yet it's lumped together as the same continuity. If that can be done when the comics are made by Archie while the tv show was made ny DIC Entertainment, then it's more likely that the games that are made by Sonic Team and Sonic X which was made by Sonic Team are the same continuity.

I've only just seen the comment you left earlier, just because I can't disprove it, doesn't mean it's true. What if someone where to say that Big has the secret ability of flight that he never uses? It can't be confirmed or denied, just like your claim, so should it be placed here? Along with all manner of made-up nonsense and speculation?  Myself <font color="Black">123  18:48, April 13, 2011 (UTC)

how does changing the anime make it canon in the games? i don't know what theory you have but leave it out of mainspace articles since you are lying and vandalizing, also being made by the same company doesn't prve anything, marve makes omics,movies,cartoons and they are different continuities. give me one link here sega or sonic team calim it is the same continuity and i will leave you lone. and please don't mss up my signature twisting my words

Ediskrad327 13:17, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

User:Pkstarstorm1up It's not vadlizing when it's true. and refer back to my previous comment because since Sonic News Network believes that The comics and SatAM (Which were made by two seperate companies) are the same continuity despite having conflicting stories in the two series, then it makes sense that the games and Sonic X (Which were both created by Sonic Team) are the same continuity as well despite having conflicting stories since they are both made by Sonic Team. But I don't blame you for thinking the way you do, most Sonic fans just aren't ready to accept the truth that Chris is a canon character in the games as well.

Please don't change the name of the Sonic X episodes to the names of the Japanese versions, we are the English Sonic Wiki, not the Japanese.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 19:33, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

User:Pkstarstorm1up Oh alright sorry about that, I thought the Japanese titles would be more appropriate but alright then.

Yes. But you have been warned for vandalism alot recently. You can't go by with your ideas without consulting someone first! You've been told the same things over and over again!

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 19:37, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

User:Pkstarstorm1up Wait what!? What do you mean!? That's not vadalism! The Japanese version is the real version of Sonic X afterall so how is that vadalism!? I'm sorry I mean no disrespect but I'm not sure you know what vadalism is. Vadalism is when you change something to something incorrect on purpose but technically the Japanese title isn't incorrect so therefore it's not vadalism.

what the heck are you talking about? what truth! there is no evidence of Chris being in the game continuity and the fact that sonic returned to his world at the end of season 2 makes no sence since in the games he is always in the same world EARTH also if they are the same continuity when do sonic heroes,shadow the hedgehog,sonic 2006,sonic unleahsed,sonic colors,sonic chronicles happen?

if this is your so called "truth" gime a LINK WHERE SEGA OR SONIC TEAM SAYS SO Ediskrad327 19:48, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Sonic Heroes takes place sometime after the Adventure 2 ark, Shadow the Hedgehog takes place sometime after Sonic Heroes but before the end of season 2, Sonic Chronicles is the first game to take place back on Sonic's world with Sonic 06 and the rest of the new games coming after it. Also Earth has never been stated to be the world Sonic lives on, I've checked and the Japanese manuels have only said the words Sonic's Planet, not Earth and not Mobius therefore Earth hasn't been confirmed to be the planet he lives on. Alright then ask yourself this when did Dic Entertainment and Archie ever state that SatAM and the comics were the same continuity? It's the same principles and a double stadard and you can't have it both ways.

ithe problem here is that if it is in Sonic's world WHY THE HECK AREW THERE HUMANS AND G.U.N. there when did i mention archie or DIC at all, cut the babbleing and give a proof!

Becuase there are humans and Mobians on Sonic's planet but only humans on Chris's planet, plus there are two G.U.N's one for each planet. and if you had read my previous comments about if SatAM and Archie are the same continuity despite having conflicting stories then the Games and Sonic X are the same continuity despite having conflicting stories. Plus Sonic X was made by Sonic Team therefore making it more credible.

Ediskrad327 20:04, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Dude, I told you would get blocked, try editing a page other than your talkpage.

 Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here! 20:20, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Okay one it's not false information, and two that was resolved two days ago! Why the heck am I being blocked for something that has already been resolved!?

for adding false information and claiming it real, you know how wikis work no evidence, not real!

Ediskrad327 20:34, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

That doesn't excuse the fact that the reason I'm being blocked is from something that has already been resolved. Plus you don't have any evidence that what I'm saying isn't true so your basically your adding things that don't have any evidence. Plus you can't block someone for claiming something is real on thier talk page, espcially when it is true.

the evidence is how OBVIOUSLY THE GAME AND THE ANIME CONTRADICT THEIRSELVES! you have on the ohterhand just this illusion so stop claiming this truth or give some evidence

Ediskrad327 20:41, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Then give me some evidence that SatAM and the comics are the same continuity because thier stories contridict as well! Because there is plently of information missing about Robotnik's role in the Doomsday project and SatAM on his page and only stuff on his Archie version! If this wikia can get away with the comics and SatAM being the same continuity then this Wikia should also be able to get away with the games and Sonic X being the same continuity!

I rest my case.

This disscusion is now permanatly closed.

You cannot close discussions.

I just did.

'' Hey! Bullet!  The Easter Bunny is Here!  21:03, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

stop evading I couldn't care less about SaAMm or Archie, if you wan't to make big changes discuss them in the Talk page before adding invented stuff so as you said this is closed.

Ediskrad327 21:05, April 14, 2011 (UTC)