Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20161121224449/@comment-29964947-20161123043016

Myself 123 wrote: ReflectivePhoenix wrote: From my understanding, your the big cheese running the User Of The Month. I dont feel it necessary to rat out your "second in command" (so to speak) mickey isnt a scapegoat, and your to blame for not updating the User Of The Month. Not to bash you, or dismiss your claim; but if you say your going to handle something, you cant expect someone to take care of it without formally giving them that position. To clarify, MetalMickey, or simply Metal, was the user to be interviewed, not a user whom Kagi was pawning his job onto without due notice. He never said that he expected someone else to do the interview in his stead, he was saying that he was unable to contact the would be interviewee. At the risk of repeating myself, Metal is not a "second in command" Kagi is shifting blame onto, he is the interviewee he could not get a hold of as Metal is largely inactive.

I felt the need to point this out as I seem to be the only person who noticed this difference in comment and reply, despite the attention it received. Clear communication is important in such discussions, afterall.

As for the subject at hand, I think it speaks volumes when the featured user is someone who isn't proactive within the community anymore, and Hedge brings up a good point that the general inaction of the community shows just how little interest there is for the feature. I say we remove it for the time being.

He literally wrote an article trying to revert the blame onti mickey...

"I messaged him several days ago on his message wall after actively checking his activity- during which time he didn't even bother trying to contact me- and after waiting over a week I get Journalistic telling me that Mickey is somehow waiting on me."