Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-29621263-20160917164707/@comment-29621263-20161213071700

Myself 123 wrote:

King Mudbeard wrote:

Myself 123 wrote:

King Mudbeard wrote:

Myself 123 wrote: I hope they don't, children generally make terrible actors, that's why animated children are usually played by adults. Why? In the movies animated children can also be played by children. For example, I don't want Colleen O'Shaughnessy as Tails. Because acting is an art, it's rarely something someone naturally possesses and even then, it needs to be refined through study and understanding. Children generally don't have the time or skill necessary to act. Thus, child actors are usually terrible actors. Erik, lago! This user has proved his imagination and wants to turn the film into R rating!

Plus, if current voice actors will reprise their roles, we all won't have time to pick celebrity actors to the movie! Who agrees with me? "Proved his imagination" - what does that mean? Also, please point out when I said I want the film to have an R rating? It sounds as if you're just making stuff up to discredit me because you can't counter the points I brought up.

You do realise we have no say in who appears in this movie, right? You can have your opinions on who should be in the movie and so can I, but that's all they are. Just because you want certain celebrity voice actors to appear in the movie, doesn't mean they will.

And as for your "Kirk Thornton is 60 and therefore too old" argument, I would like to point out age is irrelevant to voice acting; fictional character Bart Simpson (age 10) is voiced by a 59 year old woman. I have seen that many 3D animated films chrildren are voiced by children. So please stay away from his "age is irrelevant to voice acting" argument and try to pick celebrity actors to the movie! What do you think, lago?