Thread:BlueSpeeder/@comment-4220590-20171007115454/@comment-4533965-20171008230351

I took a day away from the matter to recollect my thoughts about this matter and not be fueled by the fire. To respond, I think I was being narrow-minded with the idea of sixteen images being the number. I still think it is too much, in my opinion, since I would much rather have the standard be 25. Sixteen seems too little, but perhaps I am not thinking the way you are about this type of trivial matter,

Also, we are not like the DC Wiki. I believe a gallery subpage should only be created when we have a certain number of images that is flooding an article. Like I said, sixteen to me seems too little but 25 seems the perfect amount.

And I do believe it is a lazy way of editing: literally copying and pasting the images to another article whenever it reaches barely its limit is lazy to me. It's just a way to possess edits easier. Maybe I am not seeing how you think it isn't lazy, but regardless, that is just how I feel.