Board Thread:User Rights Requests/@comment-477304-20170417190140/@comment-4220590-20170417203816

Myself 123 wrote: I never said I wasn't grateful for what Journalistic has done in the past, but it's a logical fallacy to think that makes infallible now. None of this justifies his current actions, nor does it excuse them.

The fact that he had to be talked to once is cause for concern enough and if two administrators felt they needed to talk about his action, then even more so.

I could do wothout the condescension, but fair enough, I present Journalistic's contributions: Special: Contributions/Journalistic. Here, you can see when Journalistic has closed down threads and unprofessionally responded to legitimate questions presented to him. Because of his current actions, sending him a message seemed pointless as I would expect him to respond as he usually does. I agree that Journal is not without his faults. However, neither does it help talking around him regarding this matter. Just because he does not always respond properly, it does not mean we should give up on him either. That only worsens the situation.