Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-1272757-20131112003859/@comment-2054358-20131121202836

I know Free isn't inactive, but the nominator's reason to demote him is "he didn't do much". That is a similar idea to inactivity demotion. And the worst case scenerio I can think of with this rule is unanswered questions, which is easily solved by another user answering for him. However, the worst case scenerio with this rule is even more disasterous. What if all the admins left and SNN becomes inactive? And then a user who was still contributing requested to adopt it, and Wikia granted him the authority. And then, he reads the inactivity rule and the power goes to his head. He demotes the remaining people who weren't demoted yet but were still inactive. And then, when the admins come back, he doesn't give them their rights because he is such a tyrant and "they didn't do much to earn their rights back." You may be able to report the tyrant, but it could take a while for Wikia Staff to respond. And the tyrant would be doing a lot of damage. And when the tyrant finally gets in trouble, we would still have to clean up his mess. Long story short: no inactivity rule = unanswered questions, with inactivity rule = Armagedden! With this inactivity rule, no one can risk leaving.