Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20160908202646/@comment-4608608-20160908233027

Kagimizu wrote:

Journalistic wrote: No. Personally, there was nothing wrong with limited bcrats with minor community consensus. However, how users took this ruling is appalling. If Myself leaves, let him leave. We're not paying him to be a sysop, this is all voluntary and he has every right to drop out. Secondly, if a few users are uproaring about it, let them do it - we had a forum thread and it passed under consensus. Nevertheless, this overblown problem is adding a serious burden on Speeder, who's doing his job as an administrator. It's not just the negative reaction to this conceptual new system; Bullet and Ultra, two thirds of the new leadership, no longer felt comfortable with the idea and being in such a position of power. Sacor doesn't quite seem to object so much, but raised no disagreement with the other two. As such, they opted to revert to the old system.

But not without changes to said system.

There is an agreement that SNN's community is currently too small to meet the current number requirements for the voting process to proceed efficiently. As such, the current proposal is to simply reduce the number of votes needed to reach a result, without aggressively booting qualified and experienced individuals from adminship or reducing the importance of community involvement. It's an alternative solution that people seem to find preferable. If that's the problem, let's do that then. We don't need a thread.