Board Thread:User Rights Requests/@comment-477304-20170417190140/@comment-1669199-20170418044646

Distant Shadow wrote: BlueSpeeder wrote: Now, let's immediately placate your fury, or perhaps inflame it, Genesjs—your inattentiveness has resulted in anger largely founded on misconceptions and lack of awareness, to a baffling degree. You eagerly sift through his contributions to find every last drop of evidence, bludgeoning his name and miscontruing his intent to fit your agenda, yet you outright ignore his most recent edits, which enacted the policies you sought to be put in place in the profanity thread:

Now, I know not everyone has the sharpest of eyes but come on, dude. A significant portion of your opening argument is predicated on misinformation, and you ought to apologize for and rectify that. That's sheer incompetence if you ask me, and I find that to be comparably harmful to what you're accusing Journalistic of. Practice due diligence, please. I agree with you Speeder. A good way of putting it. Just came across this comment. So you're basically in full agreement with BlueSpeeder about my position? I see. Then I won't engage with you any further, either. If you can't give me a good reason to change my stance on anything, or address my arguments and attempt to show me why you feel me to be in the wrong, then I will simply ignore anything else you have to say about me and what I've said and will continue to say. I want my criticisms addressed, and I won't be satisfied until they are.