Thread:Myself 123/@comment-26253917-20150508002907/@comment-26253917-20150606040616

No! How WoG works is that if something is stated, there has to be evidence to support that (Or at least have nothing contradict such claims)! If WoG states that a character likes Kung-fu but none of it is ever shown, then that statement is false and its primarily because no evidence is shown to support it. Sonic was NEVER SHOWN to ever use or possess a ring or even use them to turn into Super Sonic.

Sonic X is still published from Sega so in other words it would still contradict WoG because it states that Sonic needs rings and Sonic didn't need rings there to turn into Super Sonic...he only needed the 7 chaos emeralds. Whats worse is WoG states that he has a time limit and NONE WAS EVER SHOWN IN THE SERIES SEGA PUBLISHED!!! So with that, whats to stop me from saying otherwise in the games that Sega created?

Actually as long as nothing contradicts that the character likes Kung-fu then the statement is still valid. If the character likes pie, ex, but later on hates it but WoG still says he/she likes it then that is a contradiction. If its shown more that he/she hates it then WoG is wrong.G﻿ enerally, feats>wog>character statements>power scaling>fancalcs

WoG says that the character likes pie but the character is shown that they don't. If WoG is right about Sonic, its that he can't swim. That statement has been consistent throughout all medias of Sonic.