Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-3416945-20160829051027/@comment-4608608-20160905233327

Myself 123 wrote:

Journalistic wrote:

PecolaFromScratch wrote: Journalistic wrote: Have anyone here looked at the current amount of regular users prior to the assumption that Option #1 would effectively "kill the wiki"? A thorough look at the Recent Changes could probably pinpoint. Yeah, the wiki has been pretty active in the last past weeks. I'm questioning the current amount of regular users. Anyways...

There is no denying that a usercount less than 10 is making up most of the wiki's activity for the past few years; attributed to editors like Ultra, Axel, Luma, and Speeder. Users like those are who are supporting this wiki. The wiki would've come to a screeching halt if those users were to disappear. It's also why we've fell off the Top 20 most active wikis - the point being: this community is ridiculously tiny and there's little activity because of that.

Therefore, why are we fighting to protect something that is almost futile? Kagi's fear-mongering assumption would've be correct implying if we have a decent sized community to scare off. There are no signs of a growing community as Myself pointed - and the hype from the 2017 Sonic games as Mystic pointed, one which we only saw a trailer of, doesn't support the claim. I don't recall saying there are no signs of a growing community. Wording error. Corrected.