Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-4533965-20150927011839/@comment-4533965-20151001221326

Dr. Livsi wrote: Words like 'sexy' and 'damn' don't need a warning so thought out. The contents of this wiki are not extreme enough for a warning, and even if this template was made, it would be for about 4 or 2 pages. To add, the we are not babysiters argument is still valid. Slug-Drones wrote: I think the template is misleading if the article will just have only one or two uses of words like 'damn'. It looks like its generalizing that the overall content of the page is inappropriate. I don't think it's necessary. Let me make it clear (since apparently nothing is ever clear enough) that the template is not just articles with only swearing. It's also for articles with inappropriate contents (Sonic OVA, for example). Therefore, that 2-4 page count would be increased to maybe a good ten pages.

Dr. Livsi wrote: To add, the we are not babysiters argument is still valid. Let's also add on to the fact that not every child has a parent to supervise what they're looking at online and that this wiki, while being extremely mild compared to things such as Call of Duty, has some inappropriate content sealed inside. I feel it's our job to help warn users that's there's inappropriate content on the wiki. If you highly, highly doubt there's enough articles to warrant such template, then I'll find all of the articles that has inappropriate content and list them down all to you just to prove my point.