User talk:Kaumi

RE:VS Battle
If you are the same user, then lets try to have a fresh start. Please, do not try to make the same mistakes again, and maybe we can forget this. I would not have to report you, but if you have not learned your lesson, I cant stand by and will´get you banned again. So, for your sake, lets try to civilized about this; you accept that there are thing you can't do, and I help talk with you about problems so we can come to an agreement.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 16:39, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Edit-warring is against our policy. You seem to be proud of your actions, and I must inform you that your revisions are not constructive. Continue to edit-war, and I will be force to block you. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 16:42, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

I'm so sorry sir, I was just having to say that I'm the same user, so I was doing exactly the same things. ---Kaumi (talk) 16:44, July 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, you could have just said you were without causing even more disruption. Anyway, I guess it's resolved now. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 16:57, July 31, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'll call the whole thing off, then. Ultrasonic9000, you win. I'm going to bring myself down. ---Kaumi (talk) 16:59, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Block
I've blocked you for 1 week. You were warned, both with this account and your previous account. Your behavior is unacceptable, and edit-warring is not tolerated. Feel free to contest your block by replying on your talk page (I left that open), but remember that your actions are unkind and intolerable. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 17:16, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

It says 1 week on my block log. How did you find out about this edit warring anyway? ---Kaumi (talk) 17:27, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

I have my ways. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 17:29, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

I saw the report but you knew before that. How? And what do you mean by "I have my ways"?

Please no emoticons. ---17:32, July 31, 2013 (UTC)Kaumi (talk)

I checked your contributions and recent wiki activity. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 17:34, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Why do you keep reverting my edits? That's not very nice, SU. Could you not do it? ---Kaumi (talk) 17:36, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but the wiki becomes redundant if we are too specific. Ultra and I told you why we reverted your edits, but you never told us why you reverted our edits. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 17:40, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

All right all right! The reason I was reverting your "edits" was because the way I wrote it was more fitting. It wasn't my fault. I'm purely innocent. Ultra started it by reverting it back. Could you ask him what his side of it is? ---Kaumi (talk) 17:51, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

In my defense, I told you on the history why I undid them. What I did had the support of several admins behind it. it is your own fault for not listening to them and accepting that this is the way things are here.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 17:55, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Is it that we kept undoing edits by each other that caused an edit war? It wasn't me who started it. Everything was fine until you jumped in with a revert. If you hadn't done that, this wouldn't have happened. Do you get my side of it now? ---Kaumi (talk) 18:00, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

So what you are saying is that a large number of professional editors who have worked here for a long time is wrong while you solely are right? I am sorry, but we have argumenets and professionals behind this edit and why it should not be applied. If you can't accept that others may have more valid reasons that you, then I fear you will have a hard time here.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 18:12, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

It's just that I am a very persistent person and sometimes I want things to be the way I want. ---Kaumi (talk) 18:15, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

The things you want may not the way things are meant to be here. This is not yours wiki, it is everyones, and your way may not be fit with what is best for everyone.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 18:22, July 31, 2013 (UTC)


 * groans* I guess so... ---Kaumi (talk) 18:24, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Why was I blocked anyway? What have I done? The answer is, I have done nothing. Nothing at all. Absolutely nothing, so why have you blocked me? ---Kaumi (talk) 12:20, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hello, I'm Bullet Francisco, one of the administrators on the Sonic News Network. Please do not add statements such as "DO NOT ERASE" to our articles. No one is going to erase the specified information, and adding "DO NOT ERASE" only encourages users to erase the content. "DO NO ERASE" has nothing to do with the article. This is what we refer to as "vandalism". Please refrain from doing this in the future, or I may be forced to temporarily remove your account's ability to edit articles. Thanks for understanding. -- 06:56, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

The reason I was writing things like that was because I think the way I had written it was better. So I wrote in brackets "do not revert!" and "No reverting" so people wouldn't. It's the same reason as why I wrote "DO NOT ERASE" on the quote. ---K.A.U.M.I. &#34;&#39;CAUSE THAT&#39;S VERY, VERY&#34;... (talk) 14:16, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

My ban expires today so I look forward to coming back vandalising again! I always like that here! ---Kaumi (talk) 06:37, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Block
You've blocked me now, have you? And you've blocked my email. ---K.A.U.M.I. (talk) 07:20, August 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes. -- 07:24, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you explain why you have blocked me? ---K.A.U.M.I. (talk) 07:25, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * You didn't stop after I had asked you to (read above message). -- 07:28, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * The reason I did it was because I wanted people my opinions and I don't want people to revert it. Speaking of reverting, could you ask Mystic Orb to come here and explain why he reverted my edits? ---K.A.U.M.I. (talk) 07:32, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, well you didn't need to vandalize our articles in the process. And sure, I'll request Mystic Orb to make a comment. -- 07:34, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah sorry for being late. I heard you wanted to speak with me. Mystic Orb: Who do you think I am?   What do you want?   What do I do?  07:40, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * That's right. I wanted to ask you why you reverted my edits on the the Sonic and Bla z e articles. (I do apologise, I do my z s like that.)
 * Let's get to it, shall we? Okay then:
 * Sonic the Hedgehog: In case you didn't remember back from your first block it's about the title quote. It has already been stated as unnecessary to put extra info about it and now you are continuing these 'useless wars' against Ultrasonic9000 in that edit summary. In addition, as Bullet Francisco stated, your second edit; adding "DO NOT ERASE" is considered vandalism as it has nothing to do with the article.
 * Blaze the Cat: You were edit-warring with Bullet. You made rude remarks towards him on the edit summary. And again, you vandalized it by adding "DO NOT ERASE" and putting unnecessary extra info on the title quote.
 * That is all I have to say. Mystic Orb: Who do you think I am?   What do you want?   What do I do?  08:00, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * OK. Bullet Fransisco, why have you changed my block reason from "Edit-warring" to "Vandalism"? ---K.A.U.M.I. (talk) 11:33, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * I chose the wrong option when I banned you. -- 11:53, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, you mean you were selecting a reason on the dropdown list and you chose the wrong one by mistake. But was I edit warring as well as vandalising? ---K.A.U.M.I. (talk) 11:56, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

Basically. -- 11:57, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

Unblock
Do blocked users ever get unblocked? ---Kaumi (霞 Kasumi) (talk) 15:39, August 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * That's situational. If the blocked user was editing in good faith or making good contributions, there's a chance he/she would be unblocked early. 16:03, August 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * gasp* I remember you! You're Sacorguy, aren't you? ---Kaumi (霞 Kasumi) (talk) 16:10, August 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * The 79nth clone of my race, yes. 16:14, August 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * I know you. You're the one that blocked my first account, and never unblocked it, but disabled its' contactability for "begging to be unblocked". ---Kaumi (霞 Kasumi) (talk) 16:18, August 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * Uh-huh. 16:22, August 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * This is interesting. -- Disco Divaundefined Surnik.png 16:21, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes. I am the same user's second account. ---Kaumi (霞 Kasumi) (talk) 16:24, August 16, 2013 (UTC)

Blanking pages
Please do not replace article content with blank pages. It is unhelpful to the wiki. Please reconsider your approach. Thank you.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:13, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

The reason I'm doing it is because I've found a new level 3 opponent, and I'm blanking pages and she has to catch up with me, restoring them. Sounds great, huh! ---Kaumi (talk) 07:16, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

It's me!
Hello, it's me, Himespetchi from Tamagotchi Wikia. I can see you are changing your ways on Tamagotchi Wikia and becoming an excellent contributor, but I cannot quite say the same for the Sonic Wiki. I may not be an Admin here but you should still be a good contributor on all the Wikis! If you get banned from one Wiki, you get banned from all the Wikis, so please try to listen to the Admins or else there will be nothing I can do to help you. Thanks!

Himespetchi (talk) 07:26, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

OK, I'll try and change on this wiki as well. I will try to listen to the admins on here as well. It's just like Tamagotchi Wikia but with many different users!

Wow, it's pretty cool, this wikia network, isn't it. We can go onto many wikis! ---Kaumi (talk) 07:33, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

I was shocked to see this too. But I couldn't believe what I saw my eyes. You just broken the trust that was given to you and now you want to blow it again? I just couldn't believe it.

I don't know what to say right now. But what I want to say is: "Do you want to keep contributing or not?" Just listen to us. If you want to do it for all of mankind, be good to others. ---TacticalMaster (talk) 07:35, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

I will. ---Kaumi (talk) 08:29, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Super Ring
Why do you keep undoing my edits on Super Ring? What is your reason for it?Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 09:14, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

I only undid it once!! And why did you threaten me about reporting me? ---Kaumi (talk) 09:16, August 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * I assumed that you were vandalizing. Sorry if that is not the case. Still, I would like to know why you keep undoing my edits on Super Rings. And you undid twiceUltrasonic9000 (talk) 09:18, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Your latest revision now. If you want vandalism, look at the Sonic and Bla z e article history. ---Kaumi (talk) 09:20, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * I understand. So will you tell me why you undid my edits on Super Rings? What was it that I wrote that made you decide that it was not good enough to be there?Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 09:23, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * No. I undid your edit for... a joke. ---Kaumi (talk) 09:25, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * A joke? You know, that is exactly vandalizing. Maybe not intentionally, but you still mess up info for your own sake and ruining it for others. Right now, I will forgive you, but I advice you that you cut that out or you will get blocked once more. I am telling you this for your own sake.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 09:29, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * For the shops, I have stated that we are taking descriptions directly from the game. Mystic Orb: Who do you think I am?   What do you want?   What do I do?  09:53, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Now, now Kaumi... you shouldn't have undid his edits just as a joke. But if you promise not to do it again, I am sure things will work out, ok?
 * Himespetchi (talk) 10:52, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, I promise not to do it again. ---Kaumi (talk) 10:54, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * We really do hope so. - MarioSonic (talk) 11:00, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * But right now, you really gotta stop with all the edit wars. You're lucky most of the contributors here have high tolerance, but for how long? Just remember what I taught you. Otherwise you may not have another chance. ---TacticalMaster (talk) 11:02, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes but when I try to talk to them, they don't reply. IT'S SO FRUSTRATING! I've been lodged into this edit-war with 4 other users. These people won't talk to me, they just revert ---Kaumi (talk) 11:06, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Huh. Well... That could be a problem. If they don't reply...well. Then that means they're acting on impulse then. Or, perhaps they are now holding a grudge against you. That would be even worse. However, I don't want to get involved; I contributed to this wiki a bit, and I'm not gonna besmirch my image here, this wiki's has the strongest community.
 * But here's my advice: If they don't reply, well, just give them another message each day. Just don't try to do the edit-war. But sometimes, actions speak louder than words. But if you just be reckless about it, then that'll make the situation a whole lot worse. ---TacticalMaster (talk) 11:11, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Kaumi, you claimed you try to talk to them, including me.  I did not reply to you, because you did not leave any messages on my talk page, and you made no attempt at communicating with me.  You can use our talk pages to leave us messages.
 * The Ultimate Doomer (talk) 11:17, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * No, I meant Baron and Trak Nar. ---Kaumi (talk) 11:20, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, ok.  ---The Ultimate Doomer (talk) 11:23, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay now Kaumi, I trust you to keep that promise! If the other members are annoying you it might be best not to edit this Wiki because you might get into more edit-revert-wars. If you do want to continue editing this Wiki, try not to undo other people's edits (unless they did something really bad) and talk to them about it first. If they are not replying maybe they have not come online yet, or as TacticalMaster said, they have a grudge against you and there isn't much to do about it except ask one of us for assistance.
 * Himespetchi (talk) 11:25, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Great idea, Himespetchi! When I'm having a problem, I'll message one of you and I'll go back to Tamagotchi Wikia if it persists. ---Kaumi (talk) 11:30, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * And when I say grudge, I mean, they hate you. Just incase you don't know about it. ---TacticalMaster (talk) 11:28, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * What would they hate me for? ---Kaumi (talk) 11:30, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * While some of us here may take grudge against you Kaumi, in my case, I don't. I'm just writing factual stuff here and nothing else. While when it comes to blanking pages and other times making pages less encyclopedic, I just have to do what it does. - MarioSonic (talk) 11:36, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, for starters, if you make them angry too much, then they will eventually keep that image of yours into their heads. Yeesh. Judging a book by its cover is stupid. ---TacticalMaster (talk) 11:32, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Unconstructive edits
Kaumi, I see that you have recently edited a large number of pages, sometimes blanking pages and other times making pages less encyclopedic by using slang terms or ambiguous grammar. Please stop. Such edits do not improve the quality of the wiki and are frustrating for other users, who must spend time reverting them. You have also engaged in edit-warring with other users, which is similarly unconstructive. You have been blocked multiple times in the past for unconstructive edits like these, and you have been warned repeatedly not to do it. This is now your last warning. If you engage in any more behaviour like this, you will be blocked indefinitely. I do not want to do that, so please try to restrict yourself to only constructive edits in the future. Do not remove information. Do not reword information in such a way to make it less encyclopedic or more ambiguous. And if somebody reverts one of your edits, do not revert it back again, but rather speak to them on a talk page or contact an admin. Good luck. -- Supermorff (talk) 11:24, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

I couldn't find one and those who I sent message to wouldn't reply!! It was my only option to editwar!! ---Kaumi (talk) 11:27, August 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * ...Um, you couldn't just click on their usernames to look into their talk pages? ---TacticalMaster (talk) 11:30, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * I've tried that and there's nothing new there... ---Kaumi (talk) 11:35, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

You have continued to unconstructively revert edits despite my warning above. You have now been blocked indefinitely. -- Supermorff (talk) 11:36, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

That's not nice! It wasn't my fault at all. I was lodged into that war! ---Kaumi (talk) 11:38, August 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * But you could of at least just went to their talk pages!! Why didn't you listened? ---TacticalMaster (talk) 11:40, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Conducting the edit war was your choice, and there is no excuse for it. -- Supermorff (talk) 11:47, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

I did NOT!! ---Kaumi (talk) 11:57, August 18, 2013 (UTC)

Kaumi, that's enough. It's already over. Damage is already done, for now. But for the record, you still could of tried to talk it on their talk pages. Yet, you don't even know how to? ---TacticalMaster (talk) 12:00, August 18, 2013 (UTC)