Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-1272757-20131112003859/@comment-115265-20131118021303

Allow me to state my opinion...

I have looked at the arguments on both sides, and both sides have what I believe to be good points. That said, however, I don't believe I was present when it was agreed to demote inactive administrators in the first place, so I am unaware of the reasoning behind that, at the time it was put into place. I'm going to play devil's advocate, here...

Bullet, do you know where the old site discussion went concerning this? I'd like to get up to speed. I also have a question, though the answer may or may not be in the aforementioned discussion: What harm is there in cutting out the middleman?

And a question for Kagi: Do we really need to argue about this process? Is it really necessary that we change it (again)?