Thread:DanikV/@comment-4220590-20170622130332

Hello DanikV. I am in a bit of a pickle which I was hoping you could help me sort out since you seem to know a lot about images. As you may known, I have been trying trying to sort out the images into certain entity-based categories lately. However, I have recently encountered something that is not easily categorized. Take for example these images:

At first glance, you could could categorize them as Category:Stock artwork. However, they are not artworks like these images which were released by the media and are thus textbook stock artworks:

The two aforementioned images are take directly out of the games they come from, making smaller parts of something bigger. As per definition, that makes them more akin to sprites from the Category:Sprites, as sprites are defined as follows: However, I am not sure it is in everyone's interest to make such a radical change, as these images are designed as artworks yet serve the texbox definition. What do you think? Should the two first kind of images be classified as sprites or stock artworks? 
 * Wikipedia: "A sprite is a two-dimensional bitmap that is integrated into a larger scene."
 * Oxford Dictionary: "A computer graphic which may be moved on-screen and otherwise manipulated as a single entity."