Thread:BlueSpeeder/@comment-4220590-20171007115454/@comment-4220590-20171007123648

Aren't you being a little opinionated about something that is a trivial matter? While I do not exactly recall the circumstances, I did recall that one of those arguments for using that number was because the number of subheadings that came out of just one gallery section with less than sixteen images really filled up the main article's heading list. You do recall our fights on the Wisp gallery section, correct?

I may also be opinionated regarding my viewpoint, but I think sixteen images are not "lazy" as you call it. I mean, professional wikias like DC Wiki has an entire category that hold just one image (which are their galleries), so who are we to call editors that make galleries for 16 images lazy? Also, having such a number allows us to take action early on. Besides, there are so many galleries now with less than fifty images that undoing them is work that none of us are gonna fix at the current time (I am including both me and you too).

I believe this is not something that is to be considered lazy; just SNN's chosen way of doing things, which there is nothing wrong about.