Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27033632-20150930231034/@comment-27056607-20151025055005

MobianTheAngel wrote: Mystic Monkey wrote:

MobianTheAngel wrote:

Demon heart 5 wrote: So what are you saying? That I don't see nudity or the exposure of genitalia wrong, bad, taboo, disgusting, sinful etc. Uh... you mean as long as they're not anatomically accurate, like Sally was Pre-SGW.

'cus I doubt kids cartoons and games can get away with nudity in general. Means I do not belive that nudity and genetalia should be considered a "lewd" thing and hidden away from, not just children, but society in general. And yes I mean the actual exposure of genitals/anatomically correct.

Yes I know the laws of most societies having things like that publicised is not "legal" but I honestly and strongly do not beleve in those laws or the popular belief of the censoring of such things. I do not see a reason to show them in kid shows. they serve a very basic function that, yes kids do need to know about, but not necessarily during their entertainment. We should leave that to the parents and sex ed. Basically my point is is that every other body part serves a purpose to the characters, like their hands, torso, head, ect but genitalia and other private parts have only two purposes (three on the woman's part) and neither need to be adressed in children's games/T.V. shows or any other public media. I see it only fit for education services.

I agree that those parts are not wrong in any way, but kids have a certain way of growing up and some things shouldn't be brought to their attention by their saturday morning cartoon, rather than from an one on one talk with their parents.