Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1031724-20160507004919/@comment-25102147-20160523232623

I'm not sure why Nintendo didn't put in more than SEGA, maybe it's so they can remain on a constant level, or maybe because they're putting more effort in making other games, like the new Paper Mario. Also, how do you expect SEGA to make games that are more appealing if they can't afford it? They can either make a simple, but long-term with a good enough amount of content, and hope that it'll sell well as they have enough for the next game, or the can make an extravagant game with more than enough content and go bankrupt as people forget about it in about 2-3 months. Which sounds better?