Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-477304-20160930135859/@comment-477304-20161001145346

Luma.dash wrote: Myself 123 wrote:

DeCool99 wrote: Pretty solid idea. I would particularly like to see all the active users vote as it just makes things so much easier. So to say if there is an average of 6-7 of us actively editing, it should take all of us to support a nomination. It seems a lot easier to depend on those you can actually depend on. I think it would be asking too much if a nomination needed unanimous support from all members.

And is there any better option? Actually, we must'nt depend on begging users from discord or any other place to help us on voting. It is like you're asking someone outside of the wiki for making a decision.

Practically, I see every editor's approval for that user to gain the right better than giving a right a specified number to success, because how can you tell the exact number of users. It is better to ask working users than counting on a non-existent users number.

Besides, for our current state, there is not an excess of users, so you should not count on users that rarely involve in the wiki to vote. What? I didn't say anything about asking users who are no longer on the wiki...