Thread:Luma.dash/@comment-4220590-20160518191140/@comment-24014422-20160730202612

Sacorguy79 wrote: If I may -

There's clearly a conflict of interest laid out between you two: Luma wishes to have no restraints on how our format looks by permitting users to create their own appearances per page. Ultra, on the other hand, wishes to maintain a more strict order by selecting one type of format and sticking with it. Both of these extremes have their positives and negatives. Luma's idea would attract a more active editing community, but could potentially cause our articles to become disorganized and inconsistent in format. Ultra's idea would benefit our desire to keep a professional image, but ultimately discourages an active community of editors.

The way I see things, there's room for a third option: You two need to find a common ground to agree upon, so why not put your heads together and try pooling ideas on how a format should look? In fact, this is a good method of gathering the entire community's attention and proposing a new layout that everyone could agree on. No! I didn't mean each article has to have its own style. Just to find a basic ground for using Tabbers on infoboxes, not scrapping them. I don't want to end up unorganized.