Thread:Ultrasonic9000/@comment-26409147-20150902190146/@comment-4220590-20150923215638

Dr. Livsi wrote: Ultrasonic9000 wrote: As long as something is well-written and sticks to the subject, then anything can be put up on SNN. Any subject has a right to be given its own article no matter how small if it is done well. What I am trying to say is that here on SNN, size or importance does not matter. If it is a subject, then it has all the right in the world to be an article, so such deletion under the pretenses of importance is not enough.

For example, the mirror dimension articles. They may not seem much to you, but another thinks it is necessary for them to have their own articles, and here on SNN that is something they have all the rights to do.

Again, on SNN, size or importance doesn't matter. Where are such rules written or said? An article is a different thing, it doesn't entirely need a community decided on it. If an article doesn't meet up to online encyclopaedia standards and remains a redundant stub, it should be deleted whether another user wants that information there or not. In order to remove stubs, their info is often comprised in their mother pages. A few sentences and an image is enough to discuss an aspect of one episode under one page. That being said, deletion will be important, the pages are simply of low quality. My point is that any Sonic subject here on SNN can be given its own article if it is well-written. That is a right any user have always had here on SNN. Also, quality is some relative between wikis, so what you perceive as redundant might not be considered as such in another place.