Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1031724-20160315220335/@comment-24658561-20160316183539

.

Rainbowser wrote: You too, Nintendo! Where the f*ck is Fawful? And again, another example of "Obscure character number 22 isn't in this game, therefore it is the worse game ever" which is both petty and irrelevant. Look, Fawful is cool, but he's still obscure.

At what point did I state it's the worst game ever and that I won't buy it because it doesn't have Fawful? I'm not all that interested in these games, but if Nintendo picked him to be in one of the sports titles, I'd definitely buy it. But that doesn't mean I won't buy any of the sports titles if he isn't in it. Actually, I was referencing the fact that Nintendo makes up characters for the sports games like "Waluigi"(I don't count him a real character because he hasn't been in any Mario game that's not a sports spin-off) or "Baby Daisy/Rosalina"(Baby Rosalina wrecks her entire backstory btw.) or uses transformations as characters like "Dry Bowser", "Metal Mario" or everyone's favorite non-existent transformation "Pink Gold Peach" or uses random NPCs that are even more obscure than the characters fans actually want them to use. Fawful was in three games and he played a major role in two of them, the Honey Queen was in two games and played a very minor part in one mission or two. SEGA seems to understand that Sticks in Mario&Sonic will be publicity for Boom, but Nintendo doesn't get that they could use characters from their more obscure spin-offs to make them more popular. But I guess they think they don't need to.