Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-477304-20160930135859/@comment-24014422-20160930170908

Myself 123 wrote:

BlueSpeeder wrote: Thank God someone made this. This was honestly my biggest problem with the community input in the first place: when I nominated myself for bureaucracy rights a month ago I knew I would have to beg people to vote, regardless of it was supporting, opposing, or if they were on the fence. Suffice to say, I only got about ten or so people to actually vote out of the thirty people I asked. I suggest limiting down the amount of users for a bureaucratic nomination to twelve, administrators to nine, and content moderators, rollbacks, and chat moderators to six. Any other recommendations on how many votes are required for a nomination to be passed is fine by me, just as long as we finally do this. It may be worthwhile for us to get an average of how many users are active in the community right now and use that to determine the numbers. Eight-seven are keeping an eye on the wiki (including me and you) and edit. I didn't count some bureaucrats and admins, rollbacks because they have the least involvement in the wiki for weeks (even months) and may hesitate to vote, except User:Mystic Monkey. Nor those who just comment on the forums.