Thread:Journalistic/@comment-1392727-20150810163831/@comment-4608608-20150810192910

Dr. Livsi wrote: Journalistic wrote: That's now, but it doesn't justify the fact the community ignored the 127 days to comment on it. They had since April, Livsi. April.

Again, the fact I learned the consensus more than 100 days after doesn't change anything but the fact the community waited on the last minute. Does it really matter when? For some users, the given reason was it got stale over time.

Yes it does. If there's a problem it should be resolved in a matter of days, not 1/3rd of the entire year - especially on a small thing like chat messages. This is contrary on how a community works.