Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-477304-20160930135859/@comment-24014422-20160930144325

We're sticking to Wikipedia's rules much without thinking of the major differences between us and them. Wikipedia has different subjects, while we are just specific to the Sonic series, so it is somewhat a natural thing that there is a time the activity will decline because only what we have is a singular subject.

Wikis that have far more users than us also do not use such policies as well, because they have a logic that the one who will be given the right, is the one that the majority support for them and have prominent edits in his time on the wiki (like 1000 edits for example), not because of the number of participants. And like what I said many times, if you've an objection toward the user who wants the right, just comment. We don't need to modify our rules for every single case.

Simply, the proposed user has to just give his/her qualifications and what they want to do with the rights, and that's enough. We (of course) will not give rights to user who no one has commented if he is eligible for the rights, but as well not make unprecise changes. Because who you'll be sure that the numbers you choose for every nomination will be standard for everytime? This cannot be done professionally, as the number of users can rise and fall back.