Board Thread:Speculation, Theories, and Rumors/@comment-24989822-20150515102436/@comment-679780-20150524074845

Sonic also has Lots of references in other series, better games if critics stop being bribed to treat them as third installments and the Mega Drive competed with the SNES so well that Nintendo were pressured by there business tactics.

First you believed Mario is better than Sonic as characters, we gave you plenty of evidence to support that with abilities they have, Nintendos butterball would end up ravioli when duked with Sonic's incredible speed.

Now you believe Sonic and Mario are equal but still trying to better Nintendo for Mario sake.

It is accepted that Nintendo won the console war between Sega and Nintendo. But it's important to know that while Nitnendo had the upper-hand with graphics and processors, Sega effectively rivaled them because they made use of what they got spectacularly and presented themselves well for it to work.

The dreamcast was a really good console, it could of rivaled the GameCube if given the chance however I know exactly what was the biggest flaw of why the Dreamcast failed.

Dreamcast was released too soon! It arrived at the scene and had the spotlight to itself before GameCube, PS2 and Xbox burst in on the scene and took all the attention for itself. If Sega decided to put in some last minute touches for the Dreamcast and waited a few years, the console would of perhaps been better than GameCube. But Sega had only made do with what they got and worked with pressed time.

Another thing I'd like to point out is that at leats Sonic fans like to talk about both classic and modern Sonic games. Whe Mario fans like to talk about their favourate Mario games, they usually pick the old ones before moving onto the new ones. People say a lot of things about the Sonic fandom but for certain we are not driven purely by nostalgia not the majority of us favours a specific era. We like Sonic regardless of how good or bad his games are, Sega is flawed just like the rest of us.