Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-24014422-20160917140241/@comment-24014422-20160918165529

Slug-Drones wrote:

Luma.dash wrote: Previously in this thread, the three chosen Bureaucrats decided to revert back to community consensus after feeling a lot of pressure put on them after the triumvirate idea gained community approval. So in the end, they revoked the project. This sounds like people are reluctant to bring changes, in fear that they will make a mistake. We need more mistakes because that is how we can improve. If anyone is being harsh over someone else's mistake, or a change that was reverted then they are not being civil. We should welcome people trying new things, even if they were reverted. Personally, most of the changes I made were not under community consensus, including some of the major ones. I changed the look completely multiple times without consensus (even made the buttons orange and the tab pink!), changed templates completely, changed people's edits almost entirely. Users should know that they can do these things too, without worrying about it too much. I just wanted to continue from the previous point. I know that I started like I'm promoting the next episode of a TV show, but this my neutral point of the view. I pay respect for them for being honest and not want to be on charge. But I just figured that I can use Ultra's feeling to describe what lead to this point (and that's fine), which is the point of Bluespeeder's too.