Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-679780-20151116005246/@comment-4608608-20151201080629

Dr. Livsi wrote: Journalistic wrote: Dr. Livsi wrote: That's very irrelevant, so what you're saying should not apply. "I'm going to start three polls to decide the background of the MonoBook skin"

"You can't do polls, Mystic, thus the polls aren't valid will not be counted."

"I've acounted the votes, so this will be the background for tommorow throughout December for the MonoBook skin."

"I just stated using polls for site discussions is not valid."

Irrelevant? I just think the idea of polls not being valid for the looks to coincide is not valid itself. It's common sense to address if an improper way of gathering consensus is being brought upon. Let's stop on there, please.