User talk:Sonamyfan666

Post Below Here
Put a vertical line and then the number of archives you have in the archive template. E.g. .  Myself  123  18:47, October 12, 2013 (UTC)

No problem.  Myself  123  20:29, October 12, 2013 (UTC)

Evidence
Finally i did some screenshots that proves Big's Story can be passed without the upgrade. -- 16:16, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

Here you got:

"got across" what? The "pool"? That is very easy: you jump to the water then you jump again out of the water and you're on the "ground". What kind of evidence do you want? How i can do for you to understand? -- 16:37, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

What version of the game do you have? what plataform do you have? I have the DX version for PC, i try to jump while Big was in the water and it works. -- 16:53, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

In all the games that you go underwater, you can jump very high while you are in the water. That must be a glitch of the game in Big's story that you can't jump very high. -- 17:02, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

In the PC version you can jump very high, in the Gamecube and Dreamcast you can't, so that means that in some versions and cases you can and it isn't nessesary the upgrade, the best thing we can do is put that on the trivia section of the page. -- 17:13, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

Say Sonamyfan666,who made your Amy running signature?06:50 October 14,2013

B.A.G-GOMEZ
Well, since you seem honest. Alright, I forgive you. And I apologise for accusing you. To show my good will, check this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY0g2vHOKpE  Gomez6 (talk) 18:40, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

Alright, speaking of Shantae, did you see the upcoming HD game?Gomez6 (talk) 18:44, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

Well, 3DS isn't HD. Besides, they sell themselves to Nintendo as a 2nd party, y'know? But don't worry. That's the 4th game. The third is coming exclusively to 3DS. Shantae and Risky team up to stop Risky's crew (who became crazy from absorbing Shantae's powers), and now Shantae must learn to be a pirate from the pirate queen to get her magic back.Gomez6 (talk) 18:49, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

Actually, they moved it to winter now...Gomez6 (talk) 18:52, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

Alright, thought you still meant fall. Anyway, I'm trying to make this movie, and I want opinion on this. I figure the more people support me, the more Disney will be forced to make it. Here's the link. Gomez6 (talk) 18:55, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

So you like it?Gomez6 (talk) 19:00, October 15, 2013 (UTC)

Boss fights are part of the act, so yes. As long as you got 50 rings, you can use him in boss fights. I uploaded a video on wiki about. Check it out.Gomez6 (talk) 22:34, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

I posted the Wii U version. Don't know about the 3DS version. Probably not since the bosses have their own acts. But you never know. He can draw in rings like a magnet now.Gomez6 (talk) 22:37, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

Alright, I'll find out.Gomez6 (talk) 22:40, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, they didn't show, so I'm guessing the 3DS Super Sonic will be like Sonic 4: EP I.

I have no idea. The video didn't even attempt to use the Color Power.Gomez6 (talk) 23:00, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

I thoughtthey did pretty good. Granted, parkour was slippery, but I thought it was pretty good. Gomez6 (talk) 23:06, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, never mind, you can't use Super and Color at the same time. Why are the Wisps still there, anyway?Gomez6 (talk) 23:08, October 19, 2013 (UTC)

Amy does too like shadow stop editing that page.SaalihW1234 (talk) 15:41, October 21, 2013 (UTC)

Which reviews said that? Could you link me three of them? I only remember one review that said that. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 15:20, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

What I see is criticism for a different sort of gameplay, not necessarily different concepts. I somewhat understand how you got to that conclusion, but that's more or less because that's what you were thinking when you read the review. I'm coming from a completely different angle when I read the reviews, because I think Sonic is going back to the silly blue platforming-and-maybe-speedy-if-you-actually-have-skill hedgehog that he was over 20 years ago. We can't really just imply things from the reviews, we need to state the criticism as exactly and verbatim as possible in order to avoid sounding biased. We need to explain this to the readers as close to the original criticism as possible. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 15:46, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

Okay; I think I might find a quote from a review that sums up the criticism of the gameplay. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 15:52, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

Have fun. ;) -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 15:55, October 24, 2013 (UTC)

I can respect you being a Sonicamy fan, but in the games there's no proof that Sonic likes Amy the way she likes him. Infact he clearly doesn't like her that way, so why edit his page like that? Unless your reffering to Sonic in Sonic X or something.

Do you think you could show me?

Okay, thanks. But there's one thing I still don't quite get, Sonic doesn't 'love' Amy does he?

So, he's teasing her?SuperSubSpeed (talk) 23:33, November 5, 2013 (UTC)

If that's the case, I hope Amy gets a serious attitude adjustment. Her attitude to Sonic in games like Sonic Heroes, Sonic Rush, Sonic Riders Zero Gravity, Sonic & The Black Knight and Sonic Free Riders is terrible. But that's just me, I mean the way she acted in Sonic Lost World was good. What I mean is if Amy calmed down, and give Sonic some space then maybe he might return her feelings. Thanks for your help!

You know now that I think about it, maybe what you showed me could have been a typo error like in the Sonic Heroes manual it said Knuckles was 18 when he's actually 16. That and I don't think Sonic was flirting with Amy besides he's not the shy type. SuperSubSpeed (talk) 00:41, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Even so, I personally hope Sonic doesn't end up with Amy. No offence, but I think if he did end with someone it's going to be someone who can relate to him in almost every aspect better than anyone else so I think it could be Blaze the Cat or Tiara Boobowski (a cancelled character from the cancelled 1996 Sega Saturn game Sonic X-treme) who maybe finally be debuted at some point. But hey we're all entitled to our opinions! SuperSubSpeed (talk) 23:15, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Editing
Hello Sonamyfan666, my name is BessDreamer. I have joined the Sonic News Network Wiki to contribute honestly to the information about all Sonic related. I hope it is alright to ask why the edited information is reverted back to its original?

Hello, thank you for your response. My intention was not to cause harm to the Wiki page nor to put any false information. The only reason I have tried to edit it along with the notes is there's inconsistent information and repeats of what has already been said of Sonic's personality. It is also to help the current writers including Mr.Ken Pontac who depended on Wikipedia and Youtube for information about Sonic according to an interview.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/sonic-adventure-3/youmacon-interview-with-ken-pontac-sonic-games-writer/572759309440113

He also said according to a friend who has messaged him on his Facebook account is he appreciated passion and support of the Sonic fans willing to help him with being knowledgable about Sonic and making sure there's accurate material for him to use since it is believed for whatever reason Sega/Sonic Team did not provide it to him.

"I appreciate the passion of the fans, and the energy they've put into this issue. I’m very busy on other projects right now, but if and when I work on another Sonic project this resource will be useful."



This is a direct message from him that a friend of mine personally messaged him on his Facebook. He also said he will personally use the information as a resource for when he's called to write for another Sonic game.

Alright. Thank you very much for your time and patience.

BessDreamer (talk) 08:40, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Relationships
I wouldn't say 'close' friend. But she is certainly his friend. As for love-interest, it is not a generalized term used for Amy. 'Self-proclaimed girlfriend' is though.--SlugDrones • (Contact) 10:40, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

I think it is better to exclude Blaze and Amy as "good/close friends" we cannot exactly measure how close they are. Especially Amy, as even Shahra seemed much more close to Sonic than Amy is.
 * She was probably credited as his love-interest but that is really only one game. The term has never been used again. It cannot be used to generalize her relationship with Sonic.
 * Sally and Elise can be more easily said as love-interests.

I am also unsure what the exactly meaning of love-interest is. If it involves mutual feelings for the two, then that is incorrect as generally we can say it's one-sided.--SlugDrones • (Contact) 10:48, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Sally is still Sonic's love-interest, no matter how you put it. I was merely giving an example of what a love-interest is.

We cannot confirm that they share mutual feelings unless it is official. Love-interest has more than one meaning, the Sonic & the Secret Rings biography didn't make it specific, also it is really the only biography that uses this term for Amy. There's one thing nearly every official sources confirm, it's that she's his 'self-proclaimed girlfriend'. Mention of close friend and mutual feelings is not clearly shown.

Basically, 'love-interest' doesn't sound specific. A love-interest could be one-sided or mutual.--SlugDrones • (Contact) 11:00, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

It isn't specific. Like I said, a love-interest could be a one-sided thing or a mutual thing. Writing down "love-interest" could confuse readers. 'Love-interest' isn't a specific, general term used for Amy. It is self-proclaimed girlfriend. It is a much more common term used and it is quite clear.--SlugDrones • (Contact) 11:06, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

That's why using the term alone isn't specific.--SlugDrones • (Contact) 11:09, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

If there is anything that sounds vague to you, you can, or ask someone else to make it more clear. Simple as that. Vague information must be clarified.--SlugDrones • (Contact) 11:13, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

So you mean


 * On Sonic's article, Amy being his love-interest means it is either that she likes him or the feelings are mutual
 * But on Amy's article, Sonic being her love-interest means that she likes him

As you can see, you are treating the same word to have different meanings. Not everyone knows this. It could misguide the readers.--SlugDrones • (Contact) 11:20, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

That doesn't sound like a 'middle-ground' to me. How about we keep the term for Amy's page but not for Sonic's? Because on Amy' it makes it kinda clear that she's attracted to him, but on Sonic's page it's pretty much in-between 'friend' or 'more than friend. Thus 'self-proclaimed' girlfriend contradicts with 'love-interest'.

Writing 'love-interest' on both says there's a mutual attraction. Which isn't apparent.--SlugDrones • (Contact) 11:26, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Deal. I like SonAmy too, don't get me wrong.--SlugDrones • (Contact) 11:29, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, by the way. We can list down 'love-interest' on both pages when we can confirm that they have mutual feelings for each other. Is that okay?--SlugDrones • (Contact) 11:32, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Blaze is a close friend of Sonic, read her bio from Sonic Generations. SuperSubSpeed (talk) 23:38, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

I was about to give him a warning when he sent you that ridiculous message, after that, a warning didn't seem enough.  Myself  123  22:54, November 23, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Trivia
Very well then. Still it's quite hard to comprehend and feels irrelevant if your trivia info is about something like that. Mystic Orb (TP.CO.EC) 07:14, December 3, 2013 (UTC)

Wikia introduced fluid layout today. It's a wikia-wide thing; every wiki is now forced to be like this. Personally, I don't like it, but we'll have to make do for now. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 16:17, December 4, 2013 (UTC) er No prob. ;)

Yo, one way of "fixing" the fluid layout is by doing "crtl minus" once on your keyboard. This makes the text and general resolution look more like the former Wikia layout. 17:17, December 4, 2013 (UTC)

No worries. 18:20, December 4, 2013 (UTC)

Oh yeah, that's because there's a redirect page called "Cyclone" that had to be deleted. Anyway, everything's fixed now, and hopefully it's the way you want it to be now. ;) -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 15:35, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Do you mean Super Sonic? Super Sonic is listed as a sub-point under Sonic because Super Sonic shares a space with Sonic on the character select screen.  Myself  123  16:00, December 16, 2013 (UTC)

Wasn't really a point, just pointing out a plus to using that method, the actual point still stands.  Myself  123  16:05, December 16, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks.
I know nothing about which hands he uses.

So if he used his right in Skyward, is he ambidextrous? The True Ultimate Silver Fan ( My talking page! Someone tell it to stop. ) 03:12, December 18, 2013 (UTC)

Oh I see. Makes sense. The True Ultimate Silver Fan ( My talking page! Someone tell it to stop. ) 03:57, December 18, 2013 (UTC)

Here, like this: if you use a custom signature. ~ if you want the default signature. 04:08, January 2, 2014 (UTC)


 * You got it spot on! Good job! ;) 04:13, January 2, 2014 (UTC)


 * No problem! Glad I can be helpful! :D 04:16, January 2, 2014 (UTC)

Look, we know little to nothing about the characters. The Eggman article or example has only a few sentences. Why do we need an article for that just for when we know hardly ANYTHING about the characters? I suggest you quit edit warring as well. 23:37, January 11, 2014 (UTC)


 * Why make the article in advance if the character will not even appear in the cartoon for another YEAR? The article itself is sloppy and full of assumptions. I rather wait until a trailer of Sonic Boom is shown. In the meantime, the sticks should be deleted and kept on the main characters pages. 23:44, January 11, 2014 (UTC)


 * That just further proves my case; we know nothing of the characters, a SINGLE IMAGE is the only thing we know about the show. Having an article on a character we don't even know looks like (in a decent image way) is redundant. 23:49, January 11, 2014 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what you even said. I'm just going to leave my opinion as is. If we get an more info (concept artwork, trailer, etc.) then the articles are fine. Until now, they are essentially useless. 23:57, January 11, 2014 (UTC)

Then we are at a stalemate. Wait and see what others think in the meantime. I wouldn't suggest reverting my edits, as you'll get block for edit warring. 00:01, January 12, 2014 (UTC)

That edit I made
Sorry about editing that thing on Cream the Rabbit's article, I thought it wasn't accurate but then you said it was. Again sorry about doing that. (Neon Girl Star (talk) 19:08, January 12, 2014 (UTC))

I took another look at the page, you undid the edit about the picture showing a guy that seems to be Jet's dad, I'll explain. I once read that the picture of the guy in the portrait is Jet's father, but I wasn't sure if that was the person who wrote that was guessing that it was Jet's dad or knew he was Jet's dad. Then I read that someone else edited the trivia on Jet's article or the article on Jet's father (if he has one on this site), saying that it might not be Jet's father. So that's why I edited on Cream's trivia. (Neon Girl Star (talk) 19:23, January 12, 2014 (UTC))

I see. (Neon Girl Star (talk) 19:32, January 12, 2014 (UTC))

Do I have to repeat myself? THERE IS LITTLE TO NOTHING ABOUT ANY OF THESE CHARACTERS KNOWN OTHER THAN A SINGLE TEADER IMAGE! Last time I checked it was a stalemate. Revert my edits again I will contact am admin and block you via edit warring. 03:34, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Re:
Calm down. BlueSpeeder is entitled to his opinion. Let him make his case. If it is true that he is "the only one" who wants it that way, then the deletion template will be removed in due time and you will have your way. -- 03:46, January 13, 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay at this point you're tempting me to ask an admin to block you for edit warring. Regardless I suggest you stop edit warring because your message on my talk page made absolutely no sense (I suggest checking your grammar), and I stated this WAYYYYY too many times: we literally only have that single image to prove the characters will appear in a show that doesn't come out until late 2014. With this, I believe we should at least WAIT when an official trailer comes out to have some decent images of the characters. At this point, we know nothing about the characters. THE WHOLE ARTICLE IS BASICALLY SPECULATION! Sorry if I was rude, but being blunt was the best way to finally tell you my true message.

My second point; other than you, who was the other person(s) that supported the article staying? Considering the article is poor with information, not to mention is almost to the point of non official (case in point: Doctor Eggman (Sonic Boom)), the wiki is made to have articles that contain official material. For all we know, the show could potentially be canceled. Why have five, FIVE articles consisting of characters that we have only a teaser image to prove of their existence! At this point, you are agitating me to exhaustion. Failing to stop will have consequences. Give me any proof of another user supporting the articles staying an I'll stop. Remember, there is no sense on keeping articles like this on the wiki, especially if we are going to have official information. We don't have pages for the Early Sonic Cartoon prior to SatAM, correct? Why should we do different with this cartoon, if it could get scrapped? 03:52, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

You still failed to tell me the other user or users that supported the article staying. If there is no other user that supports the article staying, I will leave the deletion templates on there and it will soon be deleted. 03:59, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

I hate to be rude, but just because they edited the article prior to me adding the deletion button didn't mean they think the article should stay on here. There could have been a grammar error, picture size error, etc. Just because other people edited the page doesn't mean that they supported the article existing. Therefore, I fail to see your point on why keeping the articles. I'll contact an admin to delete the articles. 04:11, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

I recently read some messages you and Bullet shared via talk pages. A template for future show might just work. In that case, the Eggman page is my only concern at this moment. When I'm on an official computer, I'll remove the delete templates and add news ones. In any case I'm sorry I was too stubborn. Please forgive me on this edit war. See you later. 04:17, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Re: That Edit I made
Hi, I know it's been a few days since we last spoke with each other, but I just want to talk to you. I'm good at editing, I have always been good at editing before I joined this wiki. I had done edits on Wikipedia and Wikiquote (although I did it as a wiki contributor) before I joined this wiki, and I'm still enjoying my time here. That's all. (Neon Girl Star (talk) 18:34, January 14, 2014 (UTC))

Oh okay, I understand but yes, discuss it on a talkpage (either on the article or the user(s) that are in disagreement with you) is a preferred method rather than in edit summaries. By the way, to cite a reference to information, see this page to learn how to, though by default, you'd use the following coding:

Mystic Orb (TP.CO.EC) 23:09, January 26, 2014 (UTC)

Hey, just so I understand this...
Assuming for a moment that all titles are canon, then what exactly is it about Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood that makes it not fit in the main series? As far as I know, there are two ways to fit it in the series - either right before Sonic Unleashed (which happened to be released afterwards), or at the end of the series. If you place it right before Sonic Unleashed, then it's simple enough to write it off as leading to the event at the beginning of the game where Super Sonic goes after Eggman but gets tricked. The only problem with this is that Shade the Echidna disappears. On the other hand, if you put it at the end of the series, then there should be no problem besides leaving the series on a giant cliffhanger. I know there is supposed to be a two-year gap in the game, but as far as I know the developers never directly stated it takes place at the end of the series, so that's why I prefer the former...

And as for ArchangelUK - while he only worked for Sega, his words are really good insight for what the company as a whole considers the "core" games and which ones they actually keep in mind going forward. However, for example, he stated that he doesn't consider Sonic and the Secret Rings canon, but those events are mentioned later on in Sonic Generations, so it had to have happened. Basically, he has said that it's his view on the canon given his interaction with higher-ups, but these titles can be brought from the back of their minds at any time. So that's why I thought it was a good away to do away with the "non-canon" section and just leave the "high-canon" declarations to the asterisk, because what's considered canon can really change at any moment depending on whomever's in charge, and at that point the section was dwindling down to games that all had one thing in common - their lack of story.

So, with that out of the way, which contradictions in Sonic Chronicles were you referring to that renders it incompatible with the series? LinkTheLefty (talk) 04:02, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

Right, I agree that Shade does vanish if you put the game right before Sonic Unleashed, but I don't think the other two are issues, and I'll explain why. It's never said how much time Sonic and friends spent in the Twilight Cage, and it's never said what exactly Eggman has been doing with his free time. It doesn't necessarily look like Eggman managed to conquer the world at the end - given the limited view we have, I think it looks more like he went to work rebuilding Metropolis, which was in ruins for most of the game. If you also take the Japanese storyline of the original 16-bit Sonic the Hedgehog into account, Sonic apparently met Eggman and knew him for a while, so he could have encountered SwatBots there since they're mentioned to be very old (possibly pre-animal container) robots. But yes, the game doesn't explain those things very well, though that's just how I interpreted these things - if the sequel ever happened/happens, it could turn out the writers had another idea. LinkTheLefty (talk) 04:34, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

No need for rudeness. I'm aware of that. Also, I'M SUPER EXCITED! 22:02, February 6, 2014 (UTC)