Board Thread:Site Discussions/@comment-1392727-20151105170311/@comment-4608608-20151109053437

Dr. Livsi wrote:

It doesn't matter who did it when, but if they're are complaints regarding an admin retouching the wiki too much, I'd still advise to make a sandbox.

Here is my sandbox. I refer back to my previous point on this..

Dr. Livsi wrote:

You made the design guidline yourself, so any change, if better, doesn't have to follow it

The tookkit wad made to help people regarding the look?

Dr. Livsi wrote:

when it coincides the news channel and twitter, whilst, the channel and twitter should coincide the wiki, not the other way around.

The brand is singular. The timing on which the designs were started was different for obvious reasons (disruptive to rebrand out of nowhere, twitter/yt was clear choice to start). The point of this brand is to unite the wiki, yt and twitter as one property with a unique look without the typical Sonic design cliches while having an informal news look per the wikis name, unlike the previous when it was difficult to execute a design to call out this wiki.

Dr. Livsi wrote:

If the wiki look has to be downgraded to look like the news channel, the guideline shouldn't apply

The look is fully intended for this wiki at first.