User talk:Kaumi

RE:VS Battle
If you are the same user, then lets try to have a fresh start. Please, do not try to make the same mistakes again, and maybe we can forget this. I would not have to report you, but if you have not learned your lesson, I cant stand by and will´get you banned again. So, for your sake, lets try to civilized about this; you accept that there are thing you can't do, and I help talk with you about problems so we can come to an agreement.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 16:39, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Edit-warring is against our policy. You seem to be proud of your actions, and I must inform you that your revisions are not constructive. Continue to edit-war, and I will be force to block you. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 16:42, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

I'm so sorry sir, I was just having to say that I'm the same user, so I was doing exactly the same things. ---Kaumi (talk) 16:44, July 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, you could have just said you were without causing even more disruption. Anyway, I guess it's resolved now. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 16:57, July 31, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'll call the whole thing off, then. Ultrasonic9000, you win. I'm going to bring myself down. ---Kaumi (talk) 16:59, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Block
I've blocked you for 1 week. You were warned, both with this account and your previous account. Your behavior is unacceptable, and edit-warring is not tolerated. Feel free to contest your block by replying on your talk page (I left that open), but remember that your actions are unkind and intolerable. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 17:16, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

It says 1 week on my block log. How did you find out about this edit warring anyway? ---Kaumi (talk) 17:27, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

I have my ways. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 17:29, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

I saw the report but you knew before that. How? And what do you mean by "I have my ways"?

Please no emoticons. ---17:32, July 31, 2013 (UTC)Kaumi (talk)

I checked your contributions and recent wiki activity. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 17:34, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Why do you keep reverting my edits? That's not very nice, SU. Could you not do it? ---Kaumi (talk) 17:36, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but the wiki becomes redundant if we are too specific. Ultra and I told you why we reverted your edits, but you never told us why you reverted our edits. -- Shadowunleashed13 (talk) 17:40, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

All right all right! The reason I was reverting your "edits" was because the way I wrote it was more fitting. It wasn't my fault. I'm purely innocent. Ultra started it by reverting it back. Could you ask him what his side of it is? ---Kaumi (talk) 17:51, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

In my defense, I told you on the history why I undid them. What I did had the support of several admins behind it. it is your own fault for not listening to them and accepting that this is the way things are here.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 17:55, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Is it that we kept undoing edits by each other that caused an edit war? It wasn't me who started it. Everything was fine until you jumped in with a revert. If you hadn't done that, this wouldn't have happened. Do you get my side of it now? ---Kaumi (talk) 18:00, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

So what you are saying is that a large number of professional editors who have worked here for a long time is wrong while you solely are right? I am sorry, but we have argumenets and professionals behind this edit and why it should not be applied. If you can't accept that others may have more valid reasons that you, then I fear you will have a hard time here.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 18:12, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

It's just that I am a very persistent person and sometimes I want things to be the way I want. ---Kaumi (talk) 18:15, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

The things you want may not the way things are meant to be here. This is not yours wiki, it is everyones, and your way may not be fit with what is best for everyone.Ultrasonic9000 (talk) 18:22, July 31, 2013 (UTC)


 * groans* I guess so... ---Kaumi (talk) 18:24, July 31, 2013 (UTC)

Why was I blocked anyway? What have I done? The answer is, I have done nothing. Nothing at all. Absolutely nothing, so why have you blocked me? ---Kaumi (talk) 12:20, August 1, 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hello, I'm Bullet Francisco, one of the administrators on the Sonic News Network. Please do not add statements such as "DO NOT ERASE" to our articles. No one is going to erase the specified information, and adding "DO NOT ERASE" only encourages users to erase the content. "DO NO ERASE" has nothing to do with the article. This is what we refer to as "vandalism". Please refrain from doing this in the future, or I may be forced to temporarily remove your account's ability to edit articles. Thanks for understanding. -- 06:56, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

The reason I was writing things like that was because I think the way I had written it was better. So I wrote in brackets "do not revert!" and "No reverting" so people wouldn't. It's the same reason as why I wrote "DO NOT ERASE" on the quote. ---K.A.U.M.I. &#34;&#39;CAUSE THAT&#39;S VERY, VERY&#34;... (talk) 14:16, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

Block
You've blocked me now, have you? And you've blocked my email. ---K.A.U.M.I. (talk) 07:20, August 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes. -- 07:24, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you explain why you have blocked me? ---K.A.U.M.I. (talk) 07:25, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * You didn't stop after I had asked you to (read above message). -- 07:28, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * The reason I did it was because I wanted people my opinions and I don't want people to revert it. Speaking of reverting, could you ask Mystic Orb to come here and explain why he reverted my edits? ---K.A.U.M.I. (talk) 07:32, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, well you didn't need to vandalize our articles in the process. And sure, I'll request Mystic Orb to make a comment. -- 07:34, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah sorry for being late. I heard you wanted to speak with me. Mystic Orb: Who do you think I am?   What do you want?   What do I do?  07:40, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * That's right. I wanted to ask you why you reverted my edits on the the Sonic and Bla z e articles. (I do apologise, I do my z s like that.)
 * Let's get to it, shall we? Okay then:
 * Sonic the Hedgehog: In case you didn't remember back from your first block it's about the title quote. It has already been stated as unnecessary to put extra info about it and now you are continuing these 'useless wars' against Ultrasonic9000 in that edit summary. In addition, as Bullet Francisco stated, your second edit; adding "DO NOT ERASE" is considered vandalism as it has nothing to do with the article.
 * Blaze the Cat: You were edit-warring with Bullet. You made rude remarks towards him on the edit summary. And again, you vandalized it by adding "DO NOT ERASE" and putting unnecessary extra info on the title quote.
 * That is all I have to say. Mystic Orb: Who do you think I am?   What do you want?   What do I do?  08:00, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * OK. Bullet Fransisco, why have you changed my block reason from "Edit-warring" to "Vandalism"? ---K.A.U.M.I. (talk) 11:33, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * I chose the wrong option when I banned you. -- 11:53, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, you mean you were selecting a reason on the dropdown list and you chose the wrong one by mistake. But was I edit warring as well as vandalising? ---K.A.U.M.I. (talk) 11:56, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

Basically. -- 11:57, August 11, 2013 (UTC)

Unblock
Do blocked users ever get unblocked? ---Kaumi (霞 Kasumi) (talk) 15:39, August 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * That's situational. If the blocked user was editing in good faith or making good contributions, there's a chance he/she would be unblocked early. 16:03, August 16, 2013 (UTC)