Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-31883379-20160314140821/@comment-30679113-20170409212847

DerpyShadowFan1234 wrote: Distant Shadow wrote:

DerpyShadowFan1234 wrote: Sorry if that got too deep for you. Ok, I just have to get this out to everyone out there. I do believe that living objects can be possessed (just read the Bible) but I do not believe in ghosts (and that's in the Bible as well). It seems a lot of people live in fear because of all that "ghost" and spiritual "creepy" stuff, but it's nothing to be afraid of. Now...Back to the topic. Tails doll, in my opinion, isn't creepy but it's not really cute either. It's okay. I meant if it had a personality or was at least self-aware like some other of Eggman's robots. Of course I don't believe it's possessed; the whole point of my comment was to support the case that it isn't. I don't believe in ghosts, monsters and especially not creepypastas. I think that stuff is just stupid. I am a very scientific minded person, and besides matters involving God (I'm Christian), I REFUSE to believe in anything like the curse of the Tails Doll without actual, presentable proof.

And if this post offends any of you, you may shove up your ____ I agree with you about the curse of the Tails doll. (And I'm Christian too so I know where you're coming from with this)